How serious is this issue really? I'm guessing it was simply hijacking other
people's unsecured http sessions by cloning their cookies from a shared
network subnet.
Or is it really as sinister as they made out?
--
The email address is a spam trap. I rarely use it.
>Did anyone see the wi-fi hacking piece on Watchdog last night? The 'hacker'
>(identity protected) was quite happily sporting a MBP.
Was that the 'hacker' or was it a customer in the cafe (they were in
the window, hacker was sitting outside)?
Cheers, T i m
The 'hacker'. The 'victims' had what looked like a netbook and a generic PC
laptop. They only showed two. I do wonder how many they tried before
finding the two which 'worked'.
From memory, aren't Macs uniquely -unsuited- to the task of hacking
because you can't put the Airport cards into promiscuous mode? Or am I
out of date?
Cheers,
Ian
They said you needed a device you could buy on the internet (obviously
meaning a usb wifi device that can work in passive (?) mode).
I bought a D-Link DWL-G122 wifi dongle a while ago to try and play around
with on my Mac (along with KisMAC). Never got around to it though.
Cheers ... Mark