Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

OT: Fishing for a Spotify invite

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Ian McCall

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 6:25:42 AM11/21/09
to
I quite fancy giving this a try - does anyone have an invite going please?


Cheers,
Ian

ray

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 7:26:39 AM11/21/09
to
Ian McCall <i...@eruvia.org> wrote:

> I quite fancy giving this a try - does anyone have an invite going please?
>

You should have email.


--
http://www.dream-weaver.com/email.php
Web development promotion and seo
http://www.spaldingcomputers.co.uk
http://www.overseasmovingsolutions.com/

SM

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 7:42:19 AM11/21/09
to
Ian McCall <i...@eruvia.org> wrote:

> I quite fancy giving this a try - does anyone have an invite going please?

Unfortunately not. I didn't realise there were invitations since I must
have requested one from Spotify early on but looking at my account it
seems invites are only available to premium subscribers.

Stuart
--
cut that out to reply

SteveH

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 8:11:21 AM11/21/09
to
Ian McCall <i...@eruvia.org> wrote:

> I quite fancy giving this a try - does anyone have an invite going please?

If anyone else wants one, reply to me by email, as I have 5 going spare
at the moment - I'm a premium subscriber.

--
SteveH

Adrian C

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 10:04:04 AM11/21/09
to
SteveH wrote:
> Ian McCall <i...@eruvia.org> wrote:
>
>> I quite fancy giving this a try - does anyone have an invite going please?
>


Ah, Spotify :-)

Sorry, I have to share this link,

The Uninspiration Chillout Gods - The Worst Chill-Out Music Ever ...
http://open.spotify.com/album/3nAewOBndmbl13CYU1pVB7

--
Adrian C

SteveH

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 10:05:54 AM11/21/09
to
SteveH <itali...@gmail.com> wrote:

Tim and Flavio - you should have email invites winging their way to you
now.
--
SteveH

Ian McCall

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 10:30:50 AM11/21/09
to
On 2009-11-21 12:26:39 +0000, data...@hotmail.com (ray) said:

> Ian McCall <i...@eruvia.org> wrote:
>
>> I quite fancy giving this a try - does anyone have an invite going please?
>>
> You should have email.

Thanks - signed up.


Cheers,
Ian


SM

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 10:42:53 AM11/21/09
to
Adrian C <em...@here.invalid> wrote:

I like that each of the 77 tracks is labelled (Chill-Out Version) but
why why why?

Flavio Matani

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 11:09:53 AM11/21/09
to
SteveH <itali...@gmail.com> wrote:

Thank you!:)

--
flavio matani
guitar tuition
http://www.flaviomatani.co.uk
http://fflavio.com

Flavio Matani

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 2:45:24 PM11/21/09
to
SteveH <itali...@gmail.com> wrote:


:) thank you:)

Tim Dunne

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 4:20:33 PM11/21/09
to
SteveH wrote:

> Tim and Flavio - you should have email invites winging their way to you
> now.

Cheers, Steve, playing with it now. Thanks for the invite.

Tim

--
My hearts numbered beat | Greetings from Birmingham, UK
Still echoes in this empty room |All about me: www.nervouscyclist.org
Fear wells in me, but nothing seems| Is your ISP pimping your data?
Enough to defend Dave Matthews| www.badphorm.co.uk

SteveH

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 4:23:20 PM11/21/09
to
Tim Dunne <Bit_B...@Blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

> SteveH wrote:
>
> > Tim and Flavio - you should have email invites winging their way to you
> > now.
>
> Cheers, Steve, playing with it now. Thanks for the invite.

It's addictive - especially if you have an iPhone / iTouch and spend a
lot of time in the car.


--
SteveH

Pd

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 5:09:35 PM11/21/09
to
Adrian C <em...@here.invalid> wrote:

> The Uninspiration Chillout Gods - The Worst Chill-Out Music Ever ...
> http://open.spotify.com/album/3nAewOBndmbl13CYU1pVB7

Sweet Home Alabama - sheer class.
Another Brick in the Wall - coool.

My ears are bleeding, softly.

And while I'm here, why does one need an invite? I just downloaded
Spotify and signed up, no invitation required.

--
Pd

Bella Jones

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 4:23:55 AM11/22/09
to
Ian McCall <i...@eruvia.org> wrote:

> I quite fancy giving this a try - does anyone have an invite going please?

Did i miss something? what is the invite for? I've had spotify for
months.

--
bellajonez at yahoo dot co dot uk

Peter Ceresole

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 4:32:18 AM11/22/09
to
Bella Jones <m...@privacy.net> wrote:

> Did i miss something? what is the invite for? I've had spotify for
> months.

If you go to <www.spotify.com>, it redirects you to the english web
site, and offers Spotify Premium for �9.99 a month, or Spotify Free,
which requires an invite.
--
Peter

Ian McCall

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 4:33:23 AM11/22/09
to
On 2009-11-22 09:23:55 +0000, m...@privacy.net (Bella Jones) said:

> Ian McCall <i...@eruvia.org> wrote:
>
>> I quite fancy giving this a try - does anyone have an invite going please?
>
> Did i miss something? what is the invite for? I've had spotify for
> months.

Free accounts. I want to try it out before I subscribe to anything, and
the free accounts require invites.


Cheers,
Ian

Flavio Matani

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 6:42:26 AM11/22/09
to
Ian McCall <i...@eruvia.org> wrote:

In my case, I can put up with the ads (I thnk, we'll see) and I cannot
really justify paying ten quid a month for this at this point
(skinflint, moi?)

SteveH

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 6:44:17 AM11/22/09
to
Flavio Matani <flavio_matani...@mac.com> wrote:

> Ian McCall <i...@eruvia.org> wrote:
>
> > On 2009-11-22 09:23:55 +0000, m...@privacy.net (Bella Jones) said:
> >
> > > Ian McCall <i...@eruvia.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I quite fancy giving this a try - does anyone have an invite going
> > >please?
> > >
> > > Did i miss something? what is the invite for? I've had spotify for
> > > months.
> >
> > Free accounts. I want to try it out before I subscribe to anything, and
> > the free accounts require invites.
> >
>
> In my case, I can put up with the ads (I thnk, we'll see) and I cannot
> really justify paying ten quid a month for this at this point
> (skinflint, moi?)

Well, the big advantage of the subscription is that you can cache stuff
for offline listening. But the value this offers really depends on how
long you spend away from 3G or WiFi connections during a typical week.
--
SteveH

SM

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 6:59:18 AM11/22/09
to
Bella Jones <m...@privacy.net> wrote:

> Ian McCall <i...@eruvia.org> wrote:
>
> > I quite fancy giving this a try - does anyone have an invite going please?
>
> Did i miss something? what is the invite for? I've had spotify for
> months.

I wondered too - I'm a bit a hazy about how I got an account earlier
this year but fairly certain an invitation wasn't needed back then.

Bella Jones

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 7:02:19 AM11/22/09
to
SM <in...@that.sundog.co.uk> wrote:

same here

Adrian C

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 7:02:42 AM11/22/09
to
Pd wrote:

> And while I'm here, why does one need an invite? I just downloaded
> Spotify and signed up, no invitation required.
>

Good Spot.

They have opened the gates for the UK. It was closed to 'invite only' in
September after the iPhone/iPod Touch application launched to prevent
their infrastructure diving under the stress of that accouncement.

--
Adrian C

Adrian C

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 7:06:57 AM11/22/09
to
Adrian C wrote:
accouncement.
>

Ahem. Announcement...

Funny, google has Results about 59,600 for accouncement.

--
Adrian C

Peter Ceresole

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 7:17:13 AM11/22/09
to
Adrian C <em...@here.invalid> wrote:

> They have opened the gates for the UK.

Where?

Go to the spotify site and you pay 9.99 for an account, or get a free
account by invitation only.
--
Peter

Pd

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 7:36:32 AM11/22/09
to
Peter Ceresole <pe...@cara.demon.co.uk> wrote:

I guess I got my account before September then.

--
Pd

Flavio Matani

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 7:50:08 AM11/22/09
to
SteveH <itali...@gmail.com> wrote:

From the site it seems you can only use the Premium version (ten quid a
month) on mobile, including iPhone.

SteveH

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 7:51:12 AM11/22/09
to
Flavio Matani <flavio_matani...@mac.com> wrote:

> SteveH <itali...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Tim Dunne <Bit_B...@Blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > SteveH wrote:
> > >
> > > > Tim and Flavio - you should have email invites winging their way to you
> > > > now.
> > >
> > > Cheers, Steve, playing with it now. Thanks for the invite.
> >
> > It's addictive - especially if you have an iPhone / iTouch and spend a
> > lot of time in the car.
>
> From the site it seems you can only use the Premium version (ten quid a
> month) on mobile, including iPhone.

Yes, sadly.

However, for less than the cost of buying 1 album a month, I get an
almost unlimited choice of music to listen to.
--
SteveH

Flavio Matani

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 7:53:28 AM11/22/09
to
SteveH <itali...@gmail.com> wrote:

Oh, indeed, of course.

In my case, I suspect the free version is quite ok for my needs.

Adrian C

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 7:53:39 AM11/22/09
to

Whoops. I clicked the home page links while signed in.

Yes, it's still invite only. Sorry for the mis-information. Normal
service will be resumed shortly after I take myself outside for a kicking.

--
Adrian C

Bella Jones

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 8:01:21 AM11/22/09
to
Peter Ceresole <pe...@cara.demon.co.uk> wrote:

all this said, i am now having a problem with my connection!

Bruce Horrocks

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 8:04:31 PM11/22/09
to
SteveH wrote:
>
> However, for less than the cost of buying 1 album a month, I get an
> almost unlimited choice of music to listen to.

With all the discussion I decided to have a look and the one thing that
I couldn't find anywhere on their site was a list of the
albums/artists available.

I suppose they are at that stage of word of mouth marketing from kid to
kid where "yeah, they've got everything" (and where the kid's knowledge
of "everything" extends back to just the last year or two of the pop
charts) is all they can cope with. Is it too much to hope that they
might have classical music and at sensible bit rates?

Regards,
--
Bruce Horrocks
Surrey
England
(bruce at scorecrow dot com)

SM

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 5:30:02 AM11/23/09
to
Bruce Horrocks <07....@scorecrow.com> wrote:

> I suppose they are at that stage of word of mouth marketing from kid to
> kid where "yeah, they've got everything" (and where the kid's knowledge
> of "everything" extends back to just the last year or two of the pop
> charts) is all they can cope with. Is it too much to hope that they
> might have classical music and at sensible bit rates?

You have to be a bit more specific than "classical" but a search for
Beethoven produces a very long list which as you scroll towards the
bottom just gets longer, sample here:

<http://embr.it/5u>

Jaimie Vandenbergh

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 5:50:57 AM11/23/09
to
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:04:31 +0000, Bruce Horrocks
<07....@scorecrow.com> wrote:

>SteveH wrote:
>>
>> However, for less than the cost of buying 1 album a month, I get an
>> almost unlimited choice of music to listen to.
>
>With all the discussion I decided to have a look and the one thing that
> I couldn't find anywhere on their site was a list of the
>albums/artists available.

This is why you should try the free version if you can get an invite
(or wait until they go open again).

> Is it too much to hope that they
>might have classical music and at sensible bit rates?

They have lots of classical at sensible bit rates. I checked out the
complete 14 concert playlist for the Bradford International Orchestra
Concert Season plus Chamber Music Season on Spotify, with only one or
two missing items.

Who are you interested in?

Cheers - Jaimie
--
There's no place like 127.0.0.1

Dorian Gray

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 6:22:17 AM11/23/09
to
In article <1j9l1oe.ymsnb41hh2o04N%peter...@gmail.invalid>,
peter...@gmail.invalid (Pd) wrote:

Wow, I just made it apparently - signed up for free account without
invitation on 28 August.

Dorian Gray

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 6:23:57 AM11/23/09
to
In article <7mu5cvF...@mid.individual.net>,
Bruce Horrocks <07....@scorecrow.com> wrote:

> I couldn't find anywhere on their site was a list of the
> albums/artists available.

I find they have more than iTunes does.

> Is it too much to hope that they
> might have classical music and at sensible bit rates?

Seems so. Premium version gives you higher bit rates.

Dorian Gray

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 6:50:57 AM11/23/09
to
In article <D.Gray-210D8D....@nntp-serv.cam.ac.uk>,
Dorian Gray <D.G...@picture.invalid> wrote:

That might have come out wrong. What I meant to say was the free
version bit rate seems fine to me (160 kbps), and premium version users
have the option of that or 320 kbps.

Pd

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 8:00:43 AM11/23/09
to
Bruce Horrocks <07....@scorecrow.com> wrote:

> Is it too much to hope that they
> might have classical music and at sensible bit rates?

They've had almost every obscure bit of music I've searched for, from
Root Boy Slim and the Sex Change Band, through several variations of
Elgar's Serenade in E minor, to Shostakovich's Symphony No.5 (rather
oddly by the Mexico City Philharmonic).

--
Pd

Graham J

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 9:13:02 AM11/23/09
to

"Pd" <peter...@gmail.invalid> wrote in message
news:1j9mx7w.q08txy1dwlaypN%peter...@gmail.invalid...

Shostakovich 5 is hardly obscure !!! I would have said it is mainstream
repertoire!

The Barber string quartet might be considered obscure, but even then his
rearrangement of the second movement for orchestral strings is well known.

--
Graham J


Jaimie Vandenbergh

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 9:31:10 AM11/23/09
to

I don't know the piece, but asking for "barber string quartet" gives
all of Op11, plus lots of parts. Recorded artists are the Endellion
SQ, Chester SQ, and Leonard Bernstein + the NY Phil.

Cheers - Jaimie
--
"We have to go forth and crush every world view that doesn't
believe in tolerance and free speech." - David Brin

Adrian C

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 10:28:20 AM11/23/09
to
Jaimie Vandenbergh wrote:

> I don't know the piece, but asking for "barber string quartet" gives
> all of Op11, plus lots of parts. Recorded artists are the Endellion
> SQ, Chester SQ, and Leonard Bernstein + the NY Phil.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adagio_for_Strings

Like ...
http://open.spotify.com/track/5cXlEtaF2Sky1xF6xf3BR7
http://open.spotify.com/track/2spjKg3AD8cPc6UrRDePyB
http://open.spotify.com/track/3LQdHWhwabhEQgjzHn05sL

(sorry I know it's horrid, being naughty)

--
Adrian C

Graham J

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 11:10:09 AM11/23/09
to

"Jaimie Vandenbergh" <jai...@sometimes.sessile.org> wrote in message
news:ot6lg5tdf2k8lp6v6...@4ax.com...

> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:13:02 -0000, "Graham J"
> <gra...@nospam.zen.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Pd" <peter...@gmail.invalid> wrote in message
>>news:1j9mx7w.q08txy1dwlaypN%peter...@gmail.invalid...
>>> Bruce Horrocks <07....@scorecrow.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is it too much to hope that they
>>>> might have classical music and at sensible bit rates?
>>>
>>> They've had almost every obscure bit of music I've searched for, from
>>> Root Boy Slim and the Sex Change Band, through several variations of
>>> Elgar's Serenade in E minor, to Shostakovich's Symphony No.5 (rather
>>> oddly by the Mexico City Philharmonic).
>>
>>Shostakovich 5 is hardly obscure !!! I would have said it is mainstream
>>repertoire!
>>
>>The Barber string quartet might be considered obscure, but even then his
>>rearrangement of the second movement for orchestral strings is well known.
>
> I don't know the piece, but asking for "barber string quartet" gives
> all of Op11, plus lots of parts. Recorded artists are the Endellion
> SQ, Chester SQ, and Leonard Bernstein + the NY Phil.

What about the Bingham quartet recording ...?

My point being you have to struggle to choose a truly obscure piece of music
to illustrate the original assertion.

--
Graham J


Pd

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 11:55:03 AM11/23/09
to
Graham J <gra...@nospam.zen.co.uk> wrote:

> "Pd" <peter...@gmail.invalid> wrote in message
> news:1j9mx7w.q08txy1dwlaypN%peter...@gmail.invalid...
> > Bruce Horrocks <07....@scorecrow.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Is it too much to hope that they
> >> might have classical music and at sensible bit rates?
> >
> > They've had almost every obscure bit of music I've searched for, from
> > Root Boy Slim and the Sex Change Band, through several variations of
> > Elgar's Serenade in E minor, to Shostakovich's Symphony No.5 (rather
> > oddly by the Mexico City Philharmonic).
>
> Shostakovich 5 is hardly obscure !!! I would have said it is mainstream
> repertoire!

Granted, they weren't good examples to illustrate obscurity.

--
Pd

Jaimie Vandenbergh

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 1:47:36 PM11/23/09
to
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:10:09 -0000, "Graham J"

<gra...@nospam.zen.co.uk> wrote:
>
>"Jaimie Vandenbergh" <jai...@sometimes.sessile.org> wrote in message
>news:ot6lg5tdf2k8lp6v6...@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:13:02 -0000, "Graham J"
>> <gra...@nospam.zen.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>>Shostakovich 5 is hardly obscure !!! I would have said it is mainstream
>>>repertoire!
>>>
>>>The Barber string quartet might be considered obscure, but even then his
>>>rearrangement of the second movement for orchestral strings is well known.
>>
>> I don't know the piece, but asking for "barber string quartet" gives
>> all of Op11, plus lots of parts. Recorded artists are the Endellion
>> SQ, Chester SQ, and Leonard Bernstein + the NY Phil.
>
>What about the Bingham quartet recording ...?
>
>My point being you have to struggle to choose a truly obscure piece of music
>to illustrate the original assertion.

Well, I wasn't making that assertion - I was showing what the results
are on a piece that you deemed possibly obscure, in case that was
helpful. Is it not?

Cheers - Jaimie
--
I like my coffee how I like my women... frothing.

Flavio Matani

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 2:35:42 PM11/23/09
to
Pd <peter...@gmail.invalid> wrote:

They have just one of Stockhausen's Klavierst�ke (the one with the
interminable repeated chord in the beginning). Looking for various
industrial/alternative bands brought _some_ results, but not the ones I
was after. Oh, ok; it doesn't know, say, This Morn' Omina but it does
have quite a bit of Diamanda Galas and the Tiger Lillies (but these are
kind of better known). Looking up classical guitarists is, again, a
mixed bag, mostly brings up the kind of 'top of the pops' of the genre.

Bruce Horrocks

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 9:45:10 PM11/23/09
to

Thank-you Stuart - I was worried that a trial investment of �10 would
result in nothing at all.

Bruce Horrocks

unread,
Nov 23, 2009, 9:48:12 PM11/23/09
to
Jaimie Vandenbergh wrote:
> They have lots of classical at sensible bit rates. I checked out the
> complete 14 concert playlist for the Bradford International Orchestra
> Concert Season plus Chamber Music Season on Spotify, with only one or
> two missing items.

Thanks also, this is useful to know.

> Who are you interested in?

Well, all of them. Or rather, those that might be a choice buy, but on
the other hand might not. Being able to listen to two or three versions
of so-and-so's piano concerto and decide on the best would be value for
money for me.

On the other hand, I could just keep listening to Radio 3's "Building a
Collection" and buy whatever they recommend.:-)

Graham J

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 4:02:16 AM11/24/09
to

"Flavio Matani" <flavio_matani...@mac.com> wrote in message
news:1j9ndze.aximgjtfsgs6N%flavio_matani...@mac.com...

> Pd <peter...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Bruce Horrocks <07....@scorecrow.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Is it too much to hope that they
>> > might have classical music and at sensible bit rates?
>>
>> They've had almost every obscure bit of music I've searched for, from
>> Root Boy Slim and the Sex Change Band, through several variations of
>> Elgar's Serenade in E minor, to Shostakovich's Symphony No.5 (rather
>> oddly by the Mexico City Philharmonic).
>
> They have just one of Stockhausen's Klavierst�ke (the one with the
> interminable repeated chord in the beginning). Looking for various
> industrial/alternative bands

Putting the words "Stockhausen" and "band" together reminds me that I think
he wrote a piece for rubber bands. Is that obscure ?!?

--
Graham J


SM

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 5:05:07 AM11/24/09
to
Bruce Horrocks <07....@scorecrow.com> wrote:

It's a pity there's the hassle of the invitations to the free version.

SM

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 5:05:07 AM11/24/09
to
Bruce Horrocks <07....@scorecrow.com> wrote:

> Well, all of them. Or rather, those that might be a choice buy, but on
> the other hand might not. Being able to listen to two or three versions
> of so-and-so's piano concerto and decide on the best would be value for
> money for me.

I seem to be using Spotify to preview music I then buy - maybe force of
habit.

zoara

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 6:01:02 AM11/24/09
to

Just out of interest, before I start fishing or an invite, do they have
any of the following artists of varying levels of obscurity? I always
struggle to find my kind of music on online sites (and often in record
shops; thank the gods for Spillers Records) and I wonder whether Spotify
will be any different.

Ø (hope that comes through properly)
Autechre
Bola
Jega
Lackluster
Mira Calix
Mouse on Mars
Oval
Panasonic (aka Pan Sonic)
Pogo (the artist that did Wonderland, not the other Pogo)
Pole
Scanner
Squarepusher
To Rococo Rot

Oh, and this artist just because their name made me laugh as I scrolled
through my music collection just now; Hairy Butter

Cheers,

-zoara-


--
email: nettid1 at fastmail dot fm

Pd

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 7:02:58 AM11/24/09
to
zoara <me...@privacy.net> wrote:

> �
12 (hard to search for being a single letter, but found an album called
Oleva with Mika Vainio)

> Autechre
38 tracks

> Bola
Agustin Carbonell "Bola" 32 tracks
Bola Abimbola 11
Bola De Nieve 113
Bola Sete 64
Bola Suriana 89
Jesus Bola 49
but no plain old Bola

> Jega
20 tracks

> Lackluster
maybe 30 (there's a Lackluster album that's not by Lackluster)

> Mira Calix
20

> Mouse on Mars
156

> Oval
maybe 3 or 4 - to separate out would take more time

> Panasonic (aka Pan Sonic)
2

> Pogo (the artist that did Wonderland, not the other Pogo)

maybe 8 collaborations, but mostly psy trance so not sure if that's your
Pogo

> Pole
maybe 30

> Scanner
30-50 including collaborations

> Squarepusher
34

> To Rococo Rot
77
>
> Hairy Butter
23

Might have found more, but fell asleep after listening to a few of those
tracks. Not saying they're boring, just sayin'.

--
Pd

Dorian Gray

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 7:32:12 AM11/24/09
to
In article
<1590677798280752656.7...@news.individual.net>,
zoara <me...@privacy.net> wrote:

> Just out of interest, before I start fishing or an invite, do they have
> any of the following artists of varying levels of obscurity?

<snip>


>
> Ø (hope that comes through properly)

Assuming that is a slashed capital O, I couldn't find it.

> Autechre
~38 tracks

> Bola
There are lots for "Bola De Nieve" and "Bola Sete"

> Jega
20 tracks

> Lackluster
~30 tracks

> Mira Calix
20 tracks

> Mouse on Mars
155 tracks

> Oval
3 tracks

> Panasonic (aka Pan Sonic)
2 tracks

> Pogo (the artist that did Wonderland, not the other Pogo)

Hard to tell - the only 2 by Pogo are "Onwards and Upwards" and
"Imagination"

> Pole
30 tracks

> Scanner
30-40 tracks, depending if you want to count "joint artist" listings
with Robin Rimbaud or David Cunningham

> Squarepusher
30 tracks

> To Rococo Rot
71 tracks

> Hairy Butter
23 tracks

Dorian Gray

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 7:41:19 AM11/24/09
to
In article <1j9oomp.1r44twn70icmkN%peter...@gmail.invalid>,
peter...@gmail.invalid (Pd) wrote:

<spotify artist track counts>

Ah, you beat me to it, posting yours while I was reading and responding
to posts and searching spotify...

Where there were discrepancies in our figures, it's normally because
ordered by Artist and then subtracted from the total the few at the top
and bottom that weren't the artist in question. Or counted them
manually. :P

Jaimie Vandenbergh

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 7:50:22 AM11/24/09
to

I do that a lot...

Cheers - Jaimie
--
"The answer to the second question," said Merry, "is that we could get off
in an hour. I have prepared practically everything. There are six ponies
in the stable across the fields." -- J R R Tolkien

Dorian Gray

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 8:09:53 AM11/24/09
to
In article <D.Gray-24DF30....@nntp-serv.cam.ac.uk>,
Dorian Gray <D.G...@picture.invalid> wrote:

> Where there were discrepancies in our figures, it's normally because

[I]
> ordered by Artist and then subtracted from the total...

zoara

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 7:20:25 PM11/25/09
to
Dorian Gray <D.G...@picture.invalid> wrote:
> In article
> <1590677798280752656.7...@news.individual.net>,
> zoara <me...@privacy.net> wrote:
>
> > Just out of interest, before I start fishing or an invite, do they
> > have
> > any of the following artists of varying levels of obscurity?
> <snip>
> >
> > Ø (hope that comes through properly)
> Assuming that is a slashed capital O, I couldn't find it.

It was a slashed capital O.

Thanks for checking all these for me; tallies up reasonably well with
what Pd found, and gives me a good idea of what's on there. It seems
like it is worth giving a go - but now I need to find someone who still
has spare invites. Anyone?

zoara

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 7:20:26 PM11/25/09
to
Pd <peter...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> zoara <me...@privacy.net> wrote:
>
> > Ø
> 12 (hard to search for being a single letter, but found an album
> called
> Oleva with Mika Vainio)

Sounds right.

> > Autechre
> 38 tracks

*raised eyebrow* given the figures for the others, I'm surprised this is
that low.



> > Bola
> Agustin Carbonell "Bola" 32 tracks
> Bola Abimbola 11
> Bola De Nieve 113
> Bola Sete 64
> Bola Suriana 89
> Jesus Bola 49
> but no plain old Bola

That is also surprising.


> > Jega
> 20 tracks
>
> > Lackluster
> maybe 30 (there's a Lackluster album that's not by Lackluster)
>
> > Mira Calix
> 20

Righto.


> > Mouse on Mars
> 156

Damn, I had no idea he was anywhere near that prolific...



> > Oval
> maybe 3 or 4 - to separate out would take more time

Sounds about right.


> > Panasonic (aka Pan Sonic)
> 2

Hmmm.



> > Pogo (the artist that did Wonderland, not the other Pogo)
> maybe 8 collaborations, but mostly psy trance so not sure if that's
> your
> Pogo

Nope, don't think so.


> > Pole
> maybe 30
>
> > Scanner
> 30-50 including collaborations
>
> > Squarepusher
> 34
>
> > To Rococo Rot
> 77

Not bad for this lot.

> > Hairy Butter
> 23

I thought these were one of those bands which only ever appeared on
compilation albums and label samplers, so this surprised me.


> Might have found more, but fell asleep after listening to a few of
> those
> tracks. Not saying they're boring, just sayin'.

Yeah, that's what I like about them.

Thanks for doing that for me. I think I might give it a go - anyone got
any invites left after all the exchanges this thread has provoked?

Dorian Gray

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 7:44:49 PM11/25/09
to
In article
<1356802670280887320.5...@news.individual.net>,
zoara <me...@privacy.net> wrote:

> It seems
> like it is worth giving a go - but now I need to find someone who still
> has spare invites. Anyone?

Sorry can't help there - I got my free account on 28 August, a few days
before they required invites (from 1 September), and I would need to pay
for a Premium account to obtain the ability to send invites to others.

Woody

unread,
Nov 26, 2009, 3:08:24 AM11/26/09
to
zoara <me...@privacy.net> wrote:

> Dorian Gray <D.G...@picture.invalid> wrote:
> > In article
> > <1590677798280752656.7...@news.individual.net>,
> > zoara <me...@privacy.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Just out of interest, before I start fishing or an invite, do they
> > > have
> > > any of the following artists of varying levels of obscurity?
> > <snip>
> > >

> > > � (hope that comes through properly)


> > Assuming that is a slashed capital O, I couldn't find it.
>
> It was a slashed capital O.
>
> Thanks for checking all these for me; tallies up reasonably well with
> what Pd found, and gives me a good idea of what's on there. It seems
> like it is worth giving a go - but now I need to find someone who still
> has spare invites. Anyone?

I have a full set of invites if you want one


--
Woody

www.alienrat.com

0 new messages