Why do you think Snit is trying to cover for David? Even he sees some
reality. He will not comment on ANY of the stuff I quote because he sees
it is real. Given how repeatedly it is clear that David's signature is
some twist of an observation Snit shared which had been a blow on David
for something he did which was foolish/dishonest/etc... its really a
daily reminder of David's continuing butthurt for having been so routinely
defeated. Well... like I said, Snit would never deny the flooder is David,
who is a demonstrable bash scripter but I don't know if it could be used
to automate this.
Asking David to apologize, a thing I didn't do, is distinct from showing
his dishonesty. My point was that good people stay here to take on bullies.
It isn't like most do not quickly figure out what this group is, Snit
especially. Gee, imagine David trying to pin his hot air on others, no
one has ever seen that before <sarcasm>.
I'm well aware the evidence I link to from Snit is merely dabbler level.
That said, it is good enough. On topic discussions will not be seen once
those of us here before the eternal September are outnumbered. That and
there will repeatedly be a mentally unstable element or two in an open
usenet group (e.g. David). The current crap aside, we have all seen who
uncontrollably blames others when he does not get his way.
I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened
Automate Google Groups https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYQ4Tg0r0g0&feature=youtu.be
Dustin Cook the Fraud