Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Windows 2003 Upgrade Recommendations

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Ian Kirker

unread,
Jul 17, 2005, 3:49:07 PM7/17/05
to
Well, my news server doesn't have a Windows Server 2003 group that I've
found, so I figured I'd ask here.

Does anyone recommend -not- upgrading to Windows Server 2003 from Windows
2000?

For reference on computer type, I'm using a Toshiba Satellite 3000-400
(Laptop, 900Mhz Pentium III, 192MB RAM), and, while the server line of OS
may be somewhat unsuitable, I rather prefer Windows 2000 to XP.

--
Ian Kirker

Message has been deleted

Ian Kirker

unread,
Jul 18, 2005, 5:19:35 PM7/18/05
to
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 20:18:01 +0100, Simon Patten <sp2...@bigfoot.com>
wrote:

> Why would you want a Server OS on a laptop? Aside from that hardware
> being a bit underpowered for running W2K3, the OS is full of
> server/security/general bloat and surely you'd end up stripping it
> back to a W2K type system to actually use it?

I prefer the design of Win2k, since it's specifically meant to (and does
seem to) give you more ready control over what's happening than what I've
seen of XP. I may follow your advice, and stick with it for now.


> FWIW I'm thinking of going back to W2K Server from W2K3 Server, mainly
> because of the lack of drivers. They say that W2K3 can often use XP
> drivers but in reality it hasn't proven to be the case for me. I've
> also had a few silly problems with it running out of resources (with
> 768MB memory, and that's not really enough) so personally I'd suggest
> sticking with vanilla W2K if that's what you like.


Thanks for the info and advice. I think I will.
--
Ian Kirker

Trevor Best

unread,
Jul 18, 2005, 8:34:59 PM7/18/05
to
Ian Kirker wrote:
> Well, my news server doesn't have a Windows Server 2003 group that I've
> found, so I figured I'd ask here.

There is now a uk.comp.os.ms-windows, that superceeds this group and the
98 one and encompasses all releases, since the individual groups aren't
very busy anyway :-)

> Does anyone recommend -not- upgrading to Windows Server 2003 from
> Windows 2000?
>
> For reference on computer type, I'm using a Toshiba Satellite 3000-400
> (Laptop, 900Mhz Pentium III, 192MB RAM), and, while the server line of
> OS may be somewhat unsuitable, I rather prefer Windows 2000 to XP.

I once set up a Win2K3 test server on my laptop, a HP NX9005 XP2500+,
512MB RAM, 60GB HDD.

Bear in mind a new install of XPee runs like greased weasel sh1t off a
highly polished shovel on that one, Win2K3 ran like a 1 legged dog.
Something about laptops, a desktop machine of lesser spec runs it OK but
the laptop was slooooooooooooow.

--
[OO=00=OO]

Message has been deleted
0 new messages