Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Belkin N1 router replacement

5 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted

ChrisK

unread,
Oct 22, 2014, 12:54:58 PM10/22/14
to
dave wrote:
> I'd like to replace a Belkin N1 router (NAT home network that connects
> to virgin via their Super something ), with something that has at
> least 6 ports (rather than the 4 we currently have.
>
> Tried daisy chaining router-router and that works but I find it clumsy
> as have to check two router for settings.
> (PC's here are mainly W7 and a couple of Mints.)
>
> I like the N1 as it's easy to use and set up - and see what's going on
> with those illuminated symbols on the front. Having said that what
> would be nice(r) is to have some kind of control over bandwidth used
> on each port! Certain family users download files so large they
> trigger the Virgin throttlebank :-)
>
> Is there a suitable 6 port device someone can recommend as a
> replacement?
> tia
>

Add a switch?

eg
http://www.ebuyer.com/259797-tp-link-tl-sf1005d-5-port-10-100-switch-tl-sf1005d

Chris K

Simon Finnigan

unread,
Oct 22, 2014, 1:26:58 PM10/22/14
to
dave <da...@127.0.0.1> wrote:
> I'd like to replace a Belkin N1 router (NAT home network that connects
> to virgin via their Super something ), with something that has at
> least 6 ports (rather than the 4 we currently have.
>
> Tried daisy chaining router-router and that works but I find it clumsy
> as have to check two router for settings.
> (PC's here are mainly W7 and a couple of Mints.)
>
> I like the N1 as it's easy to use and set up - and see what's going on
> with those illuminated symbols on the front. Having said that what
> would be nice(r) is to have some kind of control over bandwidth used
> on each port! Certain family users download files so large they
> trigger the Virgin throttlebank :-)
>
> Is there a suitable 6 port device someone can recommend as a
> replacement?
> tia

I don't remember ever seeing a 6 port router. Best bet would be to add a
switch to your network - extra ports, no extra messing about. Just connect
it to one of the ports on your router and plug it in, then plug devices
into the switch. Dead easy.

Lee

unread,
Oct 22, 2014, 5:13:45 PM10/22/14
to
On 22/10/2014 17:39, dave wrote:
> I'd like to replace a Belkin N1 router (NAT home network that connects
> to virgin via their Super something ), with something that has at
> least 6 ports (rather than the 4 we currently have.
>
> Tried daisy chaining router-router and that works but I find it clumsy
> as have to check two router for settings.
> (PC's here are mainly W7 and a couple of Mints.)
>
> I like the N1 as it's easy to use and set up - and see what's going on
> with those illuminated symbols on the front. Having said that what
> would be nice(r) is to have some kind of control over bandwidth used
> on each port! Certain family users download files so large they
> trigger the Virgin throttlebank :-)
>
> Is there a suitable 6 port device someone can recommend as a
> replacement?
> tia
>

First hit on Google is a Dlink dir-632 8 port router, which can also run
DD-WRT.
Whether it meets your requirements of per-port throttling I have no
idea, though I suspect you would have to pay rather more money for a
product that is designed to do that....

As the others have said, just buy a 4 or 8 port switch :)

Daniel James

unread,
Oct 23, 2014, 9:54:24 AM10/23/14
to
In article
<648028612435691508.518319...@news.individual.net
>, Simon Finnigan wrote:
> I don't remember ever seeing a 6 port router.

Oh, they exist.

http://www.draytek.co.uk/products/business/vigor-2860

f'rinstance.

Nice piece of kit, too.

However, I agree that the OP would probably be better off investing in
a low-cost ethernet switch.

--
Cheers,
Daniel.


Simon Finnigan

unread,
Oct 23, 2014, 12:48:39 PM10/23/14
to
I stand corrected. Still don't think going this way will give the OP what
we really wants best.

Johny B Good

unread,
Oct 23, 2014, 8:42:41 PM10/23/14
to
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 22:13:40 +0100, Lee <cyber...@ukonline.net>
wrote:
The only practical way to impose your own traffic management, if the
facility exists in the router firmware or DD-WRT, would be to apply it
against the MAC address of the relevent PC's ethernet port.

Of course, this presumes the PC user doesn't get wise and use the
cmos config to allocate another MAC address but, I suppose, you could
probably restrict internet access by whitelisting individual PC's MAC
addresses. It all rather depends on the sophistication of the router's
firmware.
--
J B Good

Bob H

unread,
Oct 24, 2014, 3:23:20 PM10/24/14
to
That's what I did sometime last year or so. I just added an 8 port
switch, then later I added another 8 port switch, of which 4 ports are
POE, which is why I wanted it.
0 new messages