Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Painting a Rayburn

1,760 views
Skip to first unread message

MC Emily

unread,
Feb 22, 2002, 8:48:20 AM2/22/02
to
Hi

Well, since I've been searching for all things 'Rayburn', I came across a
site where someone has painted their Rayburn with Hammerite. You can see
the pictures at
http://our.farmhouse.users.btopenworld.com/raypaint.html

I wrote to these people and asked them about it - things like has it cracked
with the heat, is the paint patchy, what does it look like? They wrote back
and said that the Rayburn was originally cream. The people before them
painted it with red Hammerite and they've now painted it with green. They
said it's not patchy and they think it looks great. They haven't switched
it on since they painted it but the people before used it and it hadn't
cracked the red paint.

So, what do people here think? Is it a good idea or not? Just in case I
came across a Rayburn which was a foul colour or badly chipped, I enquired
as to the cost of having one re-enamelled and was quoted £650 + VAT. A tin
of Hammerite would be a site cheaper!!! What's your views?

Jaqy


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.325 / Virus Database: 182 - Release Date: 19/02/2002


swroot

unread,
Feb 22, 2002, 9:17:29 AM2/22/02
to
MC Emily <poo...@mrsstiggins.net> wrote:

> Hi
>
> Well, since I've been searching for all things 'Rayburn', I came across a
> site where someone has painted their Rayburn with Hammerite. You can see
> the pictures at
> http://our.farmhouse.users.btopenworld.com/raypaint.html
>
> I wrote to these people and asked them about it - things like has it cracked
> with the heat, is the paint patchy, what does it look like? They wrote back
> and said that the Rayburn was originally cream. The people before them
> painted it with red Hammerite and they've now painted it with green. They
> said it's not patchy and they think it looks great. They haven't switched
> it on since they painted it but the people before used it and it hadn't
> cracked the red paint.
>
> So, what do people here think? Is it a good idea or not? Just in case I
> came across a Rayburn which was a foul colour or badly chipped, I enquired
> as to the cost of having one re-enamelled and was quoted £650 + VAT. A tin
> of Hammerite would be a site cheaper!!! What's your views?

I know someone who painted an ancient AGA in almost constant use with
"radiator paint" -- some sort of high temp engine paint, I presume. Baby
Blue. It looked presentable if not perfect, although the hotplate covers
eventually discoloured from the heat.

regards
sarah

--
"Time is a river, the resistless flow of all created things. One
thing no sooner comes in sight than it is hurried past and
another is borne along, only to be swept away in its turn."

MC Emily

unread,
Feb 22, 2002, 9:38:26 AM2/22/02
to
"swroot" <swr...@farm-direct.co.uk> wrote

> I know someone who painted an ancient AGA in almost constant use with
> "radiator paint" -- some sort of high temp engine paint, I presume. Baby
> Blue. It looked presentable if not perfect, although the hotplate covers
> eventually discoloured from the heat.

That's really interesting. So, really, there's no need to stick to the
factory colours? I guess by using paint pigments you could have virtually
any colour you wanted. Cool!!! Now, how would Penelope Pitstop Pink look
against those stone walls..........??? ;o)

swroot

unread,
Feb 22, 2002, 1:20:30 PM2/22/02
to
MC Emily <poo...@mrsstiggins.net> wrote:

> "swroot" <swr...@farm-direct.co.uk> wrote
>
> > I know someone who painted an ancient AGA in almost constant use with
> > "radiator paint" -- some sort of high temp engine paint, I presume. Baby
> > Blue. It looked presentable if not perfect, although the hotplate covers
> > eventually discoloured from the heat.
>
> That's really interesting. So, really, there's no need to stick to the
> factory colours? I guess by using paint pigments you could have virtually
> any colour you wanted. Cool!!! Now, how would Penelope Pitstop Pink look
> against those stone walls..........??? ;o)

Bear in mind the brush marks show in the right/wrong light, and that
blue did discolour in time.

I clearly need something to cheer me up.
Shooglenifty!

Sirius

unread,
Feb 22, 2002, 2:38:03 PM2/22/02
to
Halfords manifold spray paint is good at standing up to high temps, but
colour range is limited and its probably not designed for surfaces that may
have food on them.

Tim Lamb

unread,
Feb 22, 2002, 2:42:57 PM2/22/02
to
In article <1f80flw.16fn6ma1cdugwN%swr...@farm-direct.co.uk>, swroot
<swr...@farm-direct.co.uk> writes

>I know someone who painted an ancient AGA in almost constant use with
>"radiator paint" -- some sort of high temp engine paint, I presume. Baby
>Blue. It looked presentable if not perfect, although the hotplate covers
>eventually discoloured from the heat.

Back in the days when I used to drive a sports car, it was fashionable
to spray paint the exhaust system. High temperature paint was available
from the auto accessory dealers and probably still is. Really exciting
colours:-)

regards

--
Tim Lamb

David P

unread,
Feb 22, 2002, 3:02:15 PM2/22/02
to
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 19:42:57 +0000, Tim Lamb <t...@marford.demon.co.uk>
wrote:

>In article <1f80flw.16fn6ma1cdugwN%swr...@farm-direct.co.uk>, swroot
><swr...@farm-direct.co.uk> writes
>>I know someone who painted an ancient AGA in almost constant use with
>>"radiator paint" -- some sort of high temp engine paint, I presume. Baby
>>Blue. It looked presentable if not perfect, although the hotplate covers
>>eventually discoloured from the heat.
>
>Back in the days when I used to drive a sports car, it was fashionable
>to spray paint the exhaust system.
>

Was that 'cos it spent so much time on its roof?

gd&r
--
David
Visit http://www.farm-direct.co.uk for your local farmgate food supplies.
FAQ's, Glossary, Farming Year and more!

David G. Bell

unread,
Feb 22, 2002, 3:40:48 PM2/22/02
to
On Friday, in article
<1f80mge.9naqur9z2vvzN%swr...@farm-direct.co.uk>
swr...@farm-direct.co.uk "swroot" wrote:

> MC Emily <poo...@mrsstiggins.net> wrote:
>
> > "swroot" <swr...@farm-direct.co.uk> wrote
> >
> > > I know someone who painted an ancient AGA in almost constant use with
> > > "radiator paint" -- some sort of high temp engine paint, I presume. Baby
> > > Blue. It looked presentable if not perfect, although the hotplate covers
> > > eventually discoloured from the heat.
> >
> > That's really interesting. So, really, there's no need to stick to the
> > factory colours? I guess by using paint pigments you could have virtually
> > any colour you wanted. Cool!!! Now, how would Penelope Pitstop Pink look
> > against those stone walls..........??? ;o)
>
> Bear in mind the brush marks show in the right/wrong light, and that
> blue did discolour in time.

I'm not sure that the Hammerite types of paint would be wise. They take
a _long_ time to fully dry, and you don't want the paint to be emitting
flammable solvents for several months.

Radiator paint is definitely a better choice.

Brush painting is something which improves with practice. My father is
82 and is still trying.


--
David G. Bell -- Farmer, SF Fan, Filker, and Punslinger.

Mr. Punch's Advice to a Young Man About to Become a Farmer:
"Marry, instead."

MC Emily

unread,
Feb 22, 2002, 5:24:33 PM2/22/02
to
""David G. Bell"" <db...@zhochaka.demon.co.uk> wrote

> I'm not sure that the Hammerite types of paint would be wise. They take
> a _long_ time to fully dry, and you don't want the paint to be emitting
> flammable solvents for several months.
> Radiator paint is definitely a better choice.

Thanks for that advice. I never thought about that.

> Brush painting is something which improves with practice. My father is
> 82 and is still trying.

Oh dear!!

Tim Lamb

unread,
Feb 23, 2002, 4:13:11 AM2/23/02
to
In article <3c76a38b...@News.CIS.DFN.DE>, David P
<davi...@yahoo.co.uk> writes

>>Back in the days when I used to drive a sports car, it was fashionable
>>to spray paint the exhaust system.
>>
>
>Was that 'cos it spent so much time on its roof?

Nah! Roof off from February to November. What do you think the flat hat
was for.

It remains to be seen if there will be any arthritic consequences.

Eventually I fitted a stainless steel system which removed any perceived
benefit from longer life.

Regards
--
Tim Lamb

swroot

unread,
Feb 23, 2002, 4:24:43 AM2/23/02
to
David P <davi...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

> On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 19:42:57 +0000, Tim Lamb <t...@marford.demon.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <1f80flw.16fn6ma1cdugwN%swr...@farm-direct.co.uk>, swroot
> ><swr...@farm-direct.co.uk> writes
> >>I know someone who painted an ancient AGA in almost constant use with
> >>"radiator paint" -- some sort of high temp engine paint, I presume. Baby
> >>Blue. It looked presentable if not perfect, although the hotplate covers
> >>eventually discoloured from the heat.
> >
> >Back in the days when I used to drive a sports car, it was fashionable
> >to spray paint the exhaust system.
> >
>
> Was that 'cos it spent so much time on its roof?

Ha!

Marvellous. Glad this week is over!
On second thought I could do with another day to accomplish more.

Jane Gillett

unread,
Feb 23, 2002, 5:19:05 AM2/23/02
to
In article <1f80mge.9naqur9z2vvzN%swr...@farm-direct.co.uk>,

swroot <swr...@farm-direct.co.uk> wrote:
> MC Emily <poo...@mrsstiggins.net> wrote:

> > "swroot" <swr...@farm-direct.co.uk> wrote
> >
> > > I know someone who painted an ancient AGA in almost constant use with
> > > "radiator paint" -- some sort of high temp engine paint, I presume. Baby
> > > Blue. It looked presentable if not perfect, although the hotplate covers
> > > eventually discoloured from the heat.
> >
> > That's really interesting. So, really, there's no need to stick to the
> > factory colours? I guess by using paint pigments you could have virtually
> > any colour you wanted. Cool!!! Now, how would Penelope Pitstop Pink look
> > against those stone walls..........??? ;o)

> Bear in mind the brush marks show in the right/wrong light, and that
> blue did discolour in time.

> I clearly need something to cheer me up.
> Shooglenifty!

Why stick to a single colour? Two tone? Or what about a muriel?
Jane

> regards
> sarah

--

Jane G : j.gi...@stertfarm.co.uk : S Devon

MC Emily

unread,
Feb 23, 2002, 8:21:46 AM2/23/02
to
"Jane Gillett" <j.gi...@stertfarm.co.uk> wrote

> Why stick to a single colour? Two tone? Or what about a muriel?
> Jane

Good grief, if you really think about it, the possibilities are endless!
Stripes, hearts, marbling, dragging, stencils.....I'm not sure what some of
these would look like though!!

Jim Webster

unread,
Feb 23, 2002, 8:30:03 AM2/23/02
to

Jane Gillett <j.gi...@stertfarm.co.uk> wrote in message
news:4b0d3fd5c...@ukgateway.net... >

> > I clearly need something to cheer me up.
> > Shooglenifty!
>
> Why stick to a single colour? Two tone? Or what about a muriel?
> Jane

no thanks, I don't think Brenda would approve of me keeping painted women
about the house.


--
Jim Webster

"The pasture of stupidity is unwholesome to mankind"

'Abd-ar-Rahman b. Muhammad b. Khaldun al-Hadrami'

swroot

unread,
Feb 23, 2002, 4:08:59 PM2/23/02
to
Jim Webster <j...@everyone.knows.where.by.now> wrote:

> Jane Gillett <j.gi...@stertfarm.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:4b0d3fd5c...@ukgateway.net... >
> > > I clearly need something to cheer me up.
> > > Shooglenifty!
> >
> > Why stick to a single colour? Two tone? Or what about a muriel?
> > Jane
>
> no thanks, I don't think Brenda would approve of me keeping painted women
> about the house.

Twit!

That's tea in the keyboard again...

John Daragon

unread,
Feb 24, 2002, 6:32:51 AM2/24/02
to
swroot <swr...@farm-direct.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1f82hgy.1ig3odvgivl4mN%swr...@farm-direct.co.uk...

> Jim Webster <j...@everyone.knows.where.by.now> wrote:
>
> > Jane Gillett <j.gi...@stertfarm.co.uk> wrote in message
> > news:4b0d3fd5c...@ukgateway.net... >
> > > > I clearly need something to cheer me up.
> > > > Shooglenifty!
> > >
> > > Why stick to a single colour? Two tone? Or what about a muriel?
> > > Jane
> >
> > no thanks, I don't think Brenda would approve of me keeping painted
women
> > about the house.
>
> Twit!
>
> That's tea in the keyboard again...

I'm a really sad git. (Looks around office) I have 8 keyboards in here.
After an experience with a glass of red a few years back, they're all both
cheap and waterproof.

jd

-- ------------------------------------------------
John Daragon johnAT<remove_this>argvDOTcoDOTuk
argv[0] limited, The Willows, Compton Chamberlayne, SP3 5DF, UK
(v) +44 1722 714475 (f) +44 1722 714576 (m) +44 7836 576 127
PGP Public key available on request or from ldap://certserver.pgp.com

swroot

unread,
Feb 24, 2002, 11:55:59 AM2/24/02
to
John Daragon <jo...@anti-spam-trap-argv.co.uk> wrote:

> swroot <swr...@farm-direct.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:1f82hgy.1ig3odvgivl4mN%swr...@farm-direct.co.uk...
> > Jim Webster <j...@everyone.knows.where.by.now> wrote:
> >
> > > Jane Gillett <j.gi...@stertfarm.co.uk> wrote in message
> > > news:4b0d3fd5c...@ukgateway.net... >
> > > > > I clearly need something to cheer me up.
> > > > > Shooglenifty!
> > > >
> > > > Why stick to a single colour? Two tone? Or what about a muriel?
> > > > Jane
> > >
> > > no thanks, I don't think Brenda would approve of me keeping painted
> women
> > > about the house.
> >
> > Twit!
> >
> > That's tea in the keyboard again...
>
> I'm a really sad git. (Looks around office) I have 8 keyboards in here.
> After an experience with a glass of red a few years back, they're all both
> cheap and waterproof.

Is the sad git rating directly related to number of keyboards? I didn't
know that :-)

If eight gets you into 'Really Sad Git' where do I er, sit with three?
(Two on machines, one spare.)

John Daragon

unread,
Feb 24, 2002, 1:38:25 PM2/24/02
to
swroot <swr...@farm-direct.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1f83zfk.5ndqk2x4ef3kN%swr...@farm-direct.co.uk...

> John Daragon <jo...@anti-spam-trap-argv.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > swroot <swr...@farm-direct.co.uk> wrote in message
> > news:1f82hgy.1ig3odvgivl4mN%swr...@farm-direct.co.uk...
> > > Jim Webster <j...@everyone.knows.where.by.now> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Jane Gillett <j.gi...@stertfarm.co.uk> wrote in message
> > > > news:4b0d3fd5c...@ukgateway.net... >
> > > > > > I clearly need something to cheer me up.
> > > > > > Shooglenifty!
> > > > >
> > > > > Why stick to a single colour? Two tone? Or what about a muriel?
> > > > > Jane
> > > >
> > > > no thanks, I don't think Brenda would approve of me keeping painted
> > women
> > > > about the house.
> > >
> > > Twit!
> > >
> > > That's tea in the keyboard again...
> >
> > I'm a really sad git. (Looks around office) I have 8 keyboards in here.
> > After an experience with a glass of red a few years back, they're all
both
> > cheap and waterproof.
>
> Is the sad git rating directly related to number of keyboards? I didn't
> know that :-)
>
> If eight gets you into 'Really Sad Git' where do I er, sit with three?
> (Two on machines, one spare.)

OK - confession time. What's *really* sad is that I've got 5 CPUs with no
keyboard attached. And another one coming on Tuesday. I'm looking for a
house with a barn 'cause the sound of the fans is driving me crazy.

jd.

swroot

unread,
Feb 24, 2002, 2:59:34 PM2/24/02
to
John Daragon <jo...@anti-spam-trap-argv.co.uk> wrote:

> swroot <swr...@farm-direct.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:1f83zfk.5ndqk2x4ef3kN%swr...@farm-direct.co.uk...
> > John Daragon <jo...@anti-spam-trap-argv.co.uk> wrote:

[-]

> > > I'm a really sad git. (Looks around office) I have 8 keyboards in here.
> > > After an experience with a glass of red a few years back, they're all
> both
> > > cheap and waterproof.
> >
> > Is the sad git rating directly related to number of keyboards? I didn't
> > know that :-)
> >
> > If eight gets you into 'Really Sad Git' where do I er, sit with three?
> > (Two on machines, one spare.)
>
> OK - confession time. What's *really* sad is that I've got 5 CPUs with no
> keyboard attached. And another one coming on Tuesday. I'm looking for a
> house with a barn 'cause the sound of the fans is driving me crazy.

Does that make 13 CPUs in total? How many moni... no, I don't want to
know. You're right. That is Really Sad. Alternatively you're into
Serious Computing, which may amount to the same thing.

:-)

regards
sarah

ps. I hate to think how large your Box of Stuff That Might Be Useful One
Day is.

John Daragon

unread,
Feb 24, 2002, 3:37:04 PM2/24/02
to
swroot <swr...@farm-direct.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1f84kd7.m5l2jx1c689o2N%swr...@farm-direct.co.uk...

I eye those 20 foot steel containers covetously.

jd

Tim Lamb

unread,
Feb 24, 2002, 4:55:28 PM2/24/02
to
In article <1f84kd7.m5l2jx1c689o2N%swr...@farm-direct.co.uk>, swroot
<swr...@farm-direct.co.uk> writes

>regards
>sarah
>
>ps. I hate to think how large your Box of Stuff That Might Be Useful One
>Day is.

Locally known as *possibles*:-)

regards

--
Tim Lamb

swroot

unread,
Feb 25, 2002, 7:08:35 AM2/25/02
to
John Daragon <jo...@anti-spam-trap-argv.co.uk> wrote:

> swroot <swr...@farm-direct.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:1f84kd7.m5l2jx1c689o2N%swr...@farm-direct.co.uk...
> > John Daragon <jo...@anti-spam-trap-argv.co.uk> wrote:

[-]

> > > OK - confession time. What's *really* sad is that I've got 5 CPUs with
> no > > keyboard attached. And another one coming on Tuesday. I'm looking
> for a > > house with a barn 'cause the sound of the fans is driving me
> crazy.
> >
> > Does that make 13 CPUs in total? How many moni... no, I don't want to
> > know. You're right. That is Really Sad. Alternatively you're into
> > Serious Computing, which may amount to the same thing.
> >
> > :-)
> >
> > regards
> > sarah
> >
> > ps. I hate to think how large your Box of Stuff That Might Be Useful One
> > Day is.
>
> I eye those 20 foot steel containers covetously.

Be careful. That volume could allow the Stuff to reach critical mass :-)


regards
sarah

swroot

unread,
Feb 25, 2002, 7:08:34 AM2/25/02
to
Tim Lamb <t...@marford.demon.co.uk> wrote:

Locally known as a [Your Expletive Here] Nuisance.

I'm sure the SCSI connectors are breeding in there, possibly hybridising
with the hairballs in some ancient cat-sick. No wonder I continually
have to kick the cables back under the desk.

They move, you know. At night, when the door is shut and the lights are
off, they move.


regards
sarah

David G. Bell

unread,
Feb 25, 2002, 8:18:24 AM2/25/02
to
On Monday, in article
<1f85pqx.1ou8fszpqwjsmN%swr...@farm-direct.co.uk>
swr...@farm-direct.co.uk "swroot" wrote:

> Tim Lamb <t...@marford.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > In article <1f84kd7.m5l2jx1c689o2N%swr...@farm-direct.co.uk>, swroot
> > <swr...@farm-direct.co.uk> writes
> > >regards
> > >sarah
> > >
> > >ps. I hate to think how large your Box of Stuff That Might Be Useful One
> > >Day is.
> >
> > Locally known as *possibles*:-)
>
> Locally known as a [Your Expletive Here] Nuisance.
>
> I'm sure the SCSI connectors are breeding in there, possibly hybridising
> with the hairballs in some ancient cat-sick. No wonder I continually
> have to kick the cables back under the desk.
>
> They move, you know. At night, when the door is shut and the lights are
> off, they move.

Sounds like you have one of those weird rooms where the corners meet at
_exactly_ ninety degrees, and only one parallel straight line passes
through a given point.

Unnatural, it is. There's nothing as soothing as playing with a fractal
Rubik's Tesseract.

swroot

unread,
Feb 26, 2002, 6:54:05 AM2/26/02
to
"David G. Bell" <db...@zhochaka.demon.co.uk> wrote:

> On Monday, in article
> <1f85pqx.1ou8fszpqwjsmN%swr...@farm-direct.co.uk>
> swr...@farm-direct.co.uk "swroot" wrote:
>
> > Tim Lamb <t...@marford.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > In article <1f84kd7.m5l2jx1c689o2N%swr...@farm-direct.co.uk>, swroot
> > > <swr...@farm-direct.co.uk> writes
> > > >regards
> > > >sarah
> > > >
> > > >ps. I hate to think how large your Box of Stuff That Might Be Useful One
> > > >Day is.
> > >
> > > Locally known as *possibles*:-)
> >
> > Locally known as a [Your Expletive Here] Nuisance.
> >
> > I'm sure the SCSI connectors are breeding in there, possibly hybridising
> > with the hairballs in some ancient cat-sick. No wonder I continually
> > have to kick the cables back under the desk.
> >
> > They move, you know. At night, when the door is shut and the lights are
> > off, they move.
>
> Sounds like you have one of those weird rooms where the corners meet at
> _exactly_ ninety degrees, and only one parallel straight line passes
> through a given point.
>
> Unnatural, it is. There's nothing as soothing as playing with a fractal
> Rubik's Tesseract.

Indeed so. To counter entropy and maintain the room in this state
requires a significant amount of energy emitted by a complex array of
equipment and cabling. Trialling the rituals to establish the right
frame of mind as well as time is stressful, to say the least.

And then there are the odd socks.

Jim Webster

unread,
Feb 26, 2002, 8:02:35 AM2/26/02
to

swroot <swr...@farm-direct.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1f863vy.1xl25f0mkkydoN%swr...@farm-direct.co.uk...> > Unnatural, it is.

There's nothing as soothing as playing with a fractal
> > Rubik's Tesseract.
>
> Indeed so. To counter entropy and maintain the room in this state
> requires a significant amount of energy emitted by a complex array of
> equipment and cabling. Trialling the rituals to establish the right
> frame of mind as well as time is stressful, to say the least.
>
> And then there are the odd socks.

I knew a chap who claimed to have sorted the entire ritual and sock
business. Apparently it is a multidimensional accountancy fiddle, you square
the virgin problem and relabel it as matrimony, then the sock problem also
transforms itself, although the outcome of this transformation is wildly
unpredictable


--
Jim Webster

"The pasture of stupidity is unwholesome to mankind"

'Abd-ar-Rahman b. Muhammad b. Khaldun al-Hadrami'


>

Rhyl Oil (anag.)

unread,
Feb 26, 2002, 3:23:16 PM2/26/02
to
"swroot" <swr...@farm-direct.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1f863vy.1xl25f0mkkydoN%swr...@farm-direct.co.uk...

> And then there are the odd socks.

According to my daughter, odd socks are now an essential fashion
statement. Which suits me fine. Now I don't have to pair hers up after
they've found their way through the laundry system. However, being a
bit of a traditionalist, I still prefer mine to match.

<scratching head>
What has this to do with painting a Rayburn?


swroot

unread,
Feb 26, 2002, 4:21:15 PM2/26/02
to
Jim Webster <j...@everyone.knows.where.by.now> wrote:

> swroot <swr...@farm-direct.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:1f863vy.1xl25f0mkkydoN%swr...@farm-direct.co.uk...> > Unnatural, it is.
> There's nothing as soothing as playing with a fractal
> > > Rubik's Tesseract.
> >
> > Indeed so. To counter entropy and maintain the room in this state
> > requires a significant amount of energy emitted by a complex array of
> > equipment and cabling. Trialling the rituals to establish the right
> > frame of mind as well as time is stressful, to say the least.
> >
> > And then there are the odd socks.
>
> I knew a chap who claimed to have sorted the entire ritual and sock
> business. Apparently it is a multidimensional accountancy fiddle, you square
> the virgin problem and relabel it as matrimony, then the sock problem also
> transforms itself, although the outcome of this transformation is wildly
> unpredictable

You knew Fenders? There are no derogations of his method available here:
we have to stick with the old ways -- and the local virgin quota was
exceeded months ago in the crop circle prevention campaign. I use RAM
instead (I've got a 64Mb SODIMM for the purpose) combined with cat hair:
the felted mass extracted from the back of the floppy drive is
particularly efficacious. You do have to be certain your teeth are
correctly polarised, but mac users are accustomed to that :-)

swroot

unread,
Feb 26, 2002, 4:21:17 PM2/26/02
to

You don't really want a recap, do you?

:-)

regards
sarah


ps. I had some pairs of very odd socks until I wore them out.

Jill

unread,
Feb 26, 2002, 5:24:25 PM2/26/02
to

"Rhyl Oil (anag.)" <Roy_J...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:a5grq9$7497h$1...@ID-100578.news.dfncis.de...

its UBA - thread drift is our speciality - !!!:~)))))))))))
dont try to understand ---- just join in
Jill
--
http://www.poultryscotland.co.uk http://www.henhouses.co.uk
http://www.domesticducks.co.uk http://www.poultry-books.co.uk
http://homepages.tesco.net/~welshcottage
>
>


Jim Webster

unread,
Feb 26, 2002, 5:13:42 PM2/26/02
to

swroot <swr...@farm-direct.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1f8879u.ippumcgq6djwN%swr...@farm-direct.co.uk...

I'm afraid that none of these are options for PC users. While Linux might
allow a shallow emulation, with Windows the whole system freezes, throwing
up an error message, "reality malfunction, reboot from start"


--
Jim Webster

"The pasture of stupidity is unwholesome to mankind"

'Abd-ar-Rahman b. Muhammad b. Khaldun al-Hadrami'

swroot

unread,
Feb 27, 2002, 8:40:39 AM2/27/02
to
Jim Webster <j...@everyone.knows.where.by.now> wrote:

Just as well we're talking room-size realities here. We _are_ talking
room-size, aren't we?

Jim Webster

unread,
Feb 27, 2002, 10:32:41 AM2/27/02
to

swroot <swr...@farm-direct.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1f896c8.xksoyeo7gqoN%swr...@farm-direct.co.uk...

> Jim Webster <j...@everyone.knows.where.by.now> wrote:
> > > You knew Fenders? There are no derogations of his method available
here:
> > > we have to stick with the old ways -- and the local virgin quota was
> > > exceeded months ago in the crop circle prevention campaign. I use RAM
> > > instead (I've got a 64Mb SODIMM for the purpose) combined with cat
hair:
> > > the felted mass extracted from the back of the floppy drive is
> > > particularly efficacious. You do have to be certain your teeth are
> > > correctly polarised, but mac users are accustomed to that :-)
> > >
> >
> > I'm afraid that none of these are options for PC users. While Linux
might
> > allow a shallow emulation, with Windows the whole system freezes,
throwing
> > up an error message, "reality malfunction, reboot from start"
>
> Just as well we're talking room-size realities here. We _are_ talking
> room-size, aren't we?
>

difficult to tell.

last time I rebooted I found I had a reality where the president of the US
collapsed eating snack food

not only that but I'm sure that Neasden didn't used to be real


--
Jim Webster

"The pasture of stupidity is unwholesome to mankind"

'Abd-ar-Rahman b. Muhammad b. Khaldun al-Hadrami'

swroot

unread,
Feb 27, 2002, 2:22:08 PM2/27/02
to
Jim Webster <j...@everyone.knows.where.by.now> wrote:

> swroot <swr...@farm-direct.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:1f896c8.xksoyeo7gqoN%swr...@farm-direct.co.uk...
> > Jim Webster <j...@everyone.knows.where.by.now> wrote:
> > > > You knew Fenders? There are no derogations of his method available
> here:
> > > > we have to stick with the old ways -- and the local virgin quota was
> > > > exceeded months ago in the crop circle prevention campaign. I use RAM
> > > > instead (I've got a 64Mb SODIMM for the purpose) combined with cat
> hair:
> > > > the felted mass extracted from the back of the floppy drive is
> > > > particularly efficacious. You do have to be certain your teeth are
> > > > correctly polarised, but mac users are accustomed to that :-)
> > > >
> > >
> > > I'm afraid that none of these are options for PC users. While Linux
> might > > allow a shallow emulation, with Windows the whole system
> freezes, throwing > > up an error message, "reality malfunction, reboot
> from start"
> >
> > Just as well we're talking room-size realities here. We _are_ talking
> > room-size, aren't we?
> >
>
> difficult to tell.
>
> last time I rebooted I found I had a reality where the president of the US
> collapsed eating snack food
>
> not only that but I'm sure that Neasden didn't used to be real

Given that what we think is real is in reality a function of our
perceptions and our ability to interpret our perceptions, what do you
think really exists where you perceive Neasden?

Tim Lamb

unread,
Feb 27, 2002, 3:17:20 PM2/27/02
to
In article <1f8a2gk.1k731zc13ur94wN%swr...@farm-direct.co.uk>, swroot
<swr...@farm-direct.co.uk> writes

>> not only that but I'm sure that Neasden didn't used to be real
>
>Given that what we think is real is in reality a function of our
>perceptions and our ability to interpret our perceptions, what do you
>think really exists where you perceive Neasden?

It is actually a function of there being slightly more quarks than anti-
quarks in this particular universe.

regards

--
Tim Lamb

Oz

unread,
Feb 27, 2002, 4:56:28 PM2/27/02
to
Tim Lamb writes

>It is actually a function of there being slightly more quarks than anti-
>quarks in this particular universe.

There are certainly a lot of quarks in this newsgroup.
There is, after all, nowt so queer as quarks.

--
Oz
This post is worth precisely what you paid for it.

swroot

unread,
Feb 27, 2002, 5:05:16 PM2/27/02
to
Tim Lamb <t...@marford.demon.co.uk> wrote:

Great Scott! Those of us using Quark are contributing to the effect?
I'll invest in InDesign 2 immediately...


:-)

Jim Webster

unread,
Feb 27, 2002, 3:34:18 PM2/27/02
to

swroot <swr...@farm-direct.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1f8a2gk.1k731zc13ur94wN%swr...@farm-direct.co.uk...

I believe Neasden may now be real, but once it was a place of magic, an
ethereal fantasy, as fantastical as Fanghorn or Azenomei. Now it appears to
merely be a place, what it took the place of I cannot remember.

perhaps at the next reboot it might again drift back into the realms of the
imagination, allowing its place in our current reality to be taken by
somewhere equally fabulous, such as Wogga Wogga or Timbuktu.

Rhyl Oil (anag.)

unread,
Feb 28, 2002, 2:02:25 AM2/28/02
to
"Oz" <O...@upthorpe.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:ZfzLetAM...@upthorpe.demon.co.uk...

> Tim Lamb writes
> >It is actually a function of there being slightly more quarks than
anti-
> >quarks in this particular universe.
>
> There are certainly a lot of quarks in this newsgroup.
> There is, after all, nowt so queer as quarks.

Certainly a lot of strangeness and charm.


Linda Sutherland

unread,
Feb 28, 2002, 8:31:00 AM2/28/02
to
The message <1f8aalv.1lvs89ji3mkgxN%swr...@farm-direct.co.uk>
from swr...@farm-direct.co.uk (swroot) contains these words:

> I'll invest in InDesign 2 immediately...

That paints Rayburns, too?

:-)

--
Linda Sutherland
linda.su...@zetnet.co.uk

swroot

unread,
Feb 28, 2002, 2:01:01 PM2/28/02
to
Jim Webster <j...@everyone.knows.where.by.now> wrote:

> swroot <swr...@farm-direct.co.uk> wrote in message

> news:1f8a2gk.1k731zc13ur94wN%swr...@farm-direct.co.uk...

[-]

> >
> > Given that what we think is real is in reality a function of our
> > perceptions and our ability to interpret our perceptions, what do you
> > think really exists where you perceive Neasden?
>
> I believe Neasden may now be real, but once it was a place of magic, an
> ethereal fantasy, as fantastical as Fanghorn or Azenomei. Now it appears to
> merely be a place, what it took the place of I cannot remember.
>
> perhaps at the next reboot it might again drift back into the realms of the
> imagination, allowing its place in our current reality to be taken by
> somewhere equally fabulous, such as Wogga Wogga or Timbuktu.

It does, you know. Really. It's just the reboot takes a *long* time.

regards
sarah

--
May the wind take your troubles away
Both feet on the floor
Two hands on the wheel
May the wind take your troubles away

swroot

unread,
Feb 28, 2002, 2:06:29 PM2/28/02
to
Linda Sutherland <linda.su...@zetnet.co.uk> wrote:

> The message <1f8aalv.1lvs89ji3mkgxN%swr...@farm-direct.co.uk>
> from swr...@farm-direct.co.uk (swroot) contains these words:
>
> > I'll invest in InDesign 2 immediately...
>
> That paints Rayburns, too?
>
> :-)

Not all by itself[1], but you could use it to produce instructions on
how to paint a Rayburn, or write a book on the painting of Rayburns.


[1] At least not that I know of in this reality ...

Oz

unread,
Feb 28, 2002, 3:16:06 PM2/28/02
to
swroot writes

>
>Not all by itself[1], but you could use it to produce instructions on
>how to paint a Rayburn, or write a book on the painting of Rayburns.
>

No need to write a book. Just cut & paste from this thread and you'll
have all you ever needed to know but had more sense than to ask.

swroot

unread,
Feb 28, 2002, 4:06:45 PM2/28/02
to
Oz <O...@upthorpe.demon.co.uk> wrote:

> swroot writes
> >
> >Not all by itself[1], but you could use it to produce instructions on
> >how to paint a Rayburn, or write a book on the painting of Rayburns.
> >
>
> No need to write a book. Just cut & paste from this thread and you'll
> have all you ever needed to know but had more sense than to ask.

But most of it has little to do with _actually _ painting a Rayburn.
Perhaps 'painting a Rayburn' should become an official euphemism for
discussing any topic other than that one is supposed to be discussing?

As in "We're just wasting a few minutes painting a Rayburn."

regards
sarah

Who would have changed the subject, honest, but my newreader clips the
new subject to create a new thread. Tidy, but I've had complaints.

Jim Webster

unread,
Feb 28, 2002, 4:08:41 PM2/28/02
to

swroot <swr...@farm-direct.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1f8bx05.5kxutz13rx6suN%swr...@farm-direct.co.uk...

> Linda Sutherland <linda.su...@zetnet.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > The message <1f8aalv.1lvs89ji3mkgxN%swr...@farm-direct.co.uk>
> > from swr...@farm-direct.co.uk (swroot) contains these words:
> >
> > > I'll invest in InDesign 2 immediately...
> >
> > That paints Rayburns, too?
> >
> > :-)
>
> Not all by itself[1], but you could use it to produce instructions on
> how to paint a Rayburn, or write a book on the painting of Rayburns.
>
>
> [1] At least not that I know of in this reality ...

check the defaults


--
Jim Webster

"The pasture of stupidity is unwholesome to mankind"

'Abd-ar-Rahman b. Muhammad b. Khaldun al-Hadrami'


>
>

Oz

unread,
Feb 28, 2002, 4:59:56 PM2/28/02
to
swroot writes

>
>> swroot writes
>> >
>> >Not all by itself[1], but you could use it to produce instructions on
>> >how to paint a Rayburn, or write a book on the painting of Rayburns.
>> >
>>
>> No need to write a book. Just cut & paste from this thread and you'll
>> have all you ever needed to know but had more sense than to ask.
>
>But most of it has little to do with _actually _ painting a Rayburn.
>Perhaps 'painting a Rayburn' should become an official euphemism for
>discussing any topic other than that one is supposed to be discussing?
>
>As in "We're just wasting a few minutes painting a Rayburn."

Hmmm

Yes


I see your point .....

Groovy, as they used to say.

Andrew

unread,
Mar 1, 2002, 3:44:56 AM3/1/02
to
In article <1f8bx05.5kxutz13rx6suN%swr...@farm-direct.co.uk>,
swr...@farm-direct.co.uk (swroot) wrote:

> Linda Sutherland <linda.su...@zetnet.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > The message <1f8aalv.1lvs89ji3mkgxN%swr...@farm-direct.co.uk>
> > from swr...@farm-direct.co.uk (swroot) contains these words:
> >
> > > I'll invest in InDesign 2 immediately...
> >
> > That paints Rayburns, too?
> >
> > :-)
>
> Not all by itself[1], but you could use it to produce instructions on
> how to paint a Rayburn, or write a book on the painting of Rayburns.
>
>
> [1] At least not that I know of in this reality ...

You've never come across the BestToastInTheWorld plug-in, I take it?

swroot

unread,
Mar 1, 2002, 1:06:26 PM3/1/02
to
Andrew <a.hi...@uea.ac.uk> wrote:

I'm actively avoiding it: word is it destroys the CD burner in no time
at all!

0 new messages