Sold me a Duff switch & promised some SCSI drives in it's place, hasn't
responded to my emails recently.
Keith - if you're reading this please contact me ASAP otherwise i'll be
resorting to dropping by at some point in the next few weeks when i'm in
Cyberprog New Media
tel - 0870 446 0789
fax - 0870 446 1789
I hope that is just an attempt to get him to respond.
You cant help yourself can you - are you going to infect every fucking
thread in this newsgroup with your irrelevant shite?
Nick Just fucking .... go and die or something similarly useful you fucking
You obviously don't care about your reputation either. Anyway I don't
really care if you want to troll - troll away. I believe everyone has a
right to post whatever they want to a newsgroup. I hope you are
satisfied with my response and if you want to troll me again feel free.
I end up in all kinds of places week by week so who knows :)
Hey, Nick - Alex himself is a nutter.
He's 6 foot 8 1/2 inches tall, built like a brick [outbuilding, to be
polite] and carries a baseball bat and a crowbar with him wherever he
goes. In his trouser pocket.
He's not someone you want to "bump into" on a dark night in a deserted
I gave the hardware you sold me the letsblowitup treatment,
and now it doesn't work. I want my money back!"
People like Jules, GB, Bill Jillians, Humphreys, Odie, Geoff Winkless,
JC & nog are not the problem. There is definetely something antagonist
about Tomlinson and Barker. Except Tomlinson never posted anything
offensive. I have learned from my mistakes.
I`m sure its just humour however.
Once again I`m not responding to this message becuase it offends me or
antagonises me - remember I`m a protagonist (often the hero).
Whats really fucked up about you is you pretend to have the geniune
concerns of the newsgroup at heart when really your nothing more then a
That's why I don't believe in ng police argument no-one with any sense
would really give a shit if someone posts off-topic. Neither do you -
you just use it as an excuse to start trouble.
I actually thought maybe I was wrong about you but all you've done is
prove me right. I`m sorry you are the way you are becuase you won't win
friends or get much respect something which I always will (even if I am
guilty of baiting the likes of you).
I suppose by not taking offensive or being antagonised I am baiting
you. By the way setting the follow-up to reply to alt.idiots is not
clever and it doesn't antagonise me or offend me.
Its about the only thing left you can do to try to protect yourself
from my reply which is inevitable (protagonist can't resist
antagonists) and it further damages your reputation. Although you
obviously don't give a shit about it and neither do give a shit about
I hope you are satisfied with my reply on alt.idiots a group you are no
doubt a regular contributor.
>From the Concise Oxford;
protagonist n. Chief person in drama or plot of story; leading person
contest, principal performer; advocate or champion of course, method,
Sound familiar ? The tragedy is you are probably an intelligent guy
probably more intelligent then me. Maybe that's why you do it.
Nick , this thread has nothing to do with you yet 14 of the 23 posts are you
having a conversation with yourself.
Your medication clearly isn't working. I'd suggest a trip back to the
Hehehehe , funniest thing I've read in ages.
> You think I`m that stupid
I actually think you are more stupid
> to believe I ain't getting through to you.
I'm off to the cinema and a meal with my girlfriend tonight.
Rest assured i won't give you a moment's thought.
> Why did you reply ?
I was a bit bored at work and had a couple of minutes to kill.
Remind me what job you have again Nick?
Hermes: "We can't afford that! Especially not Zoidberg!"
Zoidberg: "They took away my credit cards!"
Hope you haven't booked to see Bareback Mounting...
(It's really, really, really boring.)
I`m not quite sure of the point your making. Are you implying that
Zoidberg is practicing gay love on this thread and that you find his
posts boring. Or that this thread is more interesting then the
controversy of Bareback Mounting. Or is it just a general hope you
haven't booked to see Bareback Mountain becuause its boring. In which
case why Bareback Mounting? What is the point of your post?
Of course there was a defenite attempt to affirm his sexuality in the
post which would suggest that he may have homosexual urges toward me
which he is trying to subdue.
He may also be saying that I am a wanker with no job. Which was
probably intended to antagonise me in to posting something offensive
towards him. I certainly ain't going down to his "level".
If they reply to this with the same crap about how I should take my
medication or how no one is reading this or how they were just trolling
it just proves otherwise and they are stupid enough to think it
doesn't. They have a right to defend themselves I suppose but abusing
me or pretending they or no-one cares is not the right way to go about
it. They are in denial.
Hmmmmmm , seven replies to yourself in a row.
I think thats a record even for you.
<fx:dangles more stinky bait>
Your so predictable thats what makes you uninteresting and easy to
humiliate. You continue to oppose me with your deluded shite. You think
I actually care ? Or that anyone cares ? I am perfectly entitled to
write as many posts as I like. Your deluded opinions really don't
matter to me and I wish you wouldn't try to oppose me with them.
I think your problem is you don't think usenet is for personalities so
you oppose anyone that has one. That would explain why none of your
posts contain any substance or humour. Perhaps the reason for this is
becuase you really have no personality and are attracted to people that
That would explain why you would want to engage in a conversation with
me after having been humiliated. You must enjoy being humiliated. Thats
what it boils down to.
Trouble is you have more than just the one.
>Your so predictable thats what makes you uninteresting and easy to
>humiliate. You continue to oppose me with your deluded shite. You think
>I actually care ? Or that anyone cares ? I am perfectly entitled to
>write as many posts as I like. Your deluded opinions really don't
>matter to me and I wish you wouldn't try to oppose me with them.
>I think your problem is you don't think usenet is for personalities so
>you oppose anyone that has one. That would explain why none of your
>posts contain any substance or humour. Perhaps the reason for this is
>becuase you really have no personality and are attracted to people that
>That would explain why you would want to engage in a conversation with
>me after having been humiliated. You must enjoy being humiliated. Thats
>what it boils down to.
While it may possibly be a debate, if a short one, as to whether or
not you have a personality, it is certainly true that you are a
clueless fuckwit who can't use a newsreader properly.
In your white heat of misplaced indignation you are posting messages
all over usenet to groups who have no care whether or not you exist.
The computer adverts group may choose to indulge your puerile
teddy-throwing, but I very much doubt the membership of the other
groups you've been polluting give a shit one way of the other.
Either grow up, or get a clue, or for the sake of the future of
humanity get a vasectomy. But please don't post again until a
semblance of a clue is attained.
. Bill Maher: "Tulips aren't flowers, they're gay onions"
. A .sig is all well and good, but it's no substitute for a personality
. Is there a moron carrot above? Have you replied to it? Are you sure?
. EMail: Unless invited to, don't; it's likely to be automatically deleted.
>It was crossposted here by the idiot in question.
The "idiot" in question would be the one that wrote the message then
sent it to the newsgroup in question without bothering to check where
he was sending it.
Clue: That was you. You were the first person to pollute this
newsgroup with your rubbish thread. *You* are the idiot in question.