– Justin Thomas: PCS Union shaping up to fight Jacob
Rees-Mogg MP’s 90,000 Civil Servants Job Cuts
– Ex Labour MP Chris Williamson, from Resist UK, on what he would do if
he was Chancellor ‘People’s Great Reset’
– Five Year Decline In Public Trust Of London News Media
– Regional Media Boycott Bristol Mayor Marvin Rees’ Press Briefings After
Local Democracy Reporters banned
– Russia’s Bombing of 'Mothballed Mall' in Kremanchuk, False Atrocity
Story to Justify Ongoing Military Intervention in Ukraine?
– Online Safety Bill hands unprecedented censorship powers to Secretary
of State and Ofcom, warns new research
– Nadine Dorries’ ‘Online Safety Bill’ All Set To Criminalise Free Speech
Online
– RIP Dr Vladimir ‘Zev’ Zelenko, Trump’s Doctor Of ‘Poison Death Jab’
Fame
– Piers Corbyn and the ‘Freedom Five’ Covid Protests Fines Reduced by
£39,000 New World Tyranny
– NOT The BCfm Politics Show presented by Tony
Gosling
https://politicsthisweek.wordpress.com/2022/06/30/not-the-bcfm-politics-show-presented-by-tony-gosling-95/
Posted on
30th Jun 2022 by
Tony
Gosling
Leave a comment
Justin Thomas, PCS Union official, joins Tony and Martin. RMT
strikes and why they’re striking. Other Unions and problems workers
are facing. Covid and working from home. Cuts to Civil
Services. RMT strike and General Secretary Mick Lynch. Cost of
living crisis – what’s causing it? Outsourcing. PMQs Dominic
Raab vs Angela Rayner – RMT strike. Years of austerity since 2008.
Civil service union warns of strike over Boris Johnson’s plan to cut
91,000 jobs PCS leader says members have reached ‘tipping point’ after
PM’s combative move
The biggest civil service union has warned of strike action over Boris
Johnson’s “P&O-style” approach to cutting 91,000 Whitehall jobs, with
ministers also seeking to reduce staff redundancy terms by up to a third.
The plan to cut one in five civil service jobs caused alarm and dismay
across government departments, after Johnson told his cabinet to spend
the next month finding ways to cut the civil service back to pre-Brexit
levels within three years. He claimed it was necessary to shrink the size
of central government to tackle the cost of living crisis. The combative
move by Johnson, briefed to the Daily Mail, comes on top of existing
civil service anger over pay increases less than half of the current 7%
rate of inflation, the Cabinet Office drive to get them back into the
office and overwork from Covid backlogs. At the same time, ministers have
told trade unions they are also trying to return to previously defeated
plans
to cut redundancy packages in the civil service by up to 33%. In a
further shake-up, Steve Barclay, the Cabinet Office minister and No 10
chief of staff, said all senior civil service jobs would in future have
to be advertised externally as well as internally. While taking on the
civil service, Johnson made a fresh call to get employees in the public
and private sector back to the office after the pandemic. The government
had previously said it was up to businesses to figure out where their
workforces should be based. But in an interview with the Daily Mail, he
said: “We need to get back into the habit of getting into the office. I
believe people are more productive, more energetic, more full of ideas,
when they are surrounded by other people. “My experience of working from
home is you spend an awful lot of time making another cup of coffee, and
then you know, getting up, walking very slowly to the fridge, hacking off
a small piece of cheese, then walking very slowly back to your laptop and
then forgetting what it was you’re doing.” Mark Serwotka, the general
secretary of the Public and Commercial Services (PCS) union, representing
about 180,000 public sector workers, warned that the civil service had
reached the “tipping point” of national strike action being realistic.
“We have our conference in 10 days’ time where I’m as certain as I can be
that we will move to a national strike ballot, probably in September,” he
said. He said the civil service was already struggling with backlogs of
passports, driving licences, court cases, and pension payments due to
“chronic understaffing and a recruitment crisis”. “Six weeks ago we were
all outraged about P&O and now half a million civil servants have
woken up to the media saying one in five jobs must go,” he added,
referring to P&O Ferries’ recent sacking of nearly 800 crew. Dave
Penman, the general secretary of the FDA union, which represents 19,000
senior civil servants, said it had been like a “kind of P&O: civil
servants finding out about one in five jobs having to go via the Daily
Mail” and that the 91,000 number had been “plucked out of thin air”.
Kevin Brandstatter, a national officer at the GMB union, which represents
a large number of Ministry of Justice staff, said: “This is a complete
bombshell for the civil service and it’s not clear yet where the axe will
fall. But if the cuts hit GMB members in the Ministry of Justice it will
have a massive impact on legal aid and everyone’s right to proper
representation.” Permanent secretaries wrote to their departments on
Friday, with some expressing regret at the way the news of cuts had been
conveyed. Jim Harra, the permanent secretary at HM Revenue and Customs,
sent a message to staff saying: “I am sorry that you have learned this
from the media rather than from me or civil service
leaders.”…
Ex Labour MP Chris Williamson, from Resist UK, on what he would do if he
was Chancellor Rishi Sunak. ‘People’s Great Reset’. Simple structural
changes for industrial planning and UK wealth redistribution. Training
and development in jobs. Flattening the pyramid. PMQs Dominic Raab
vs Angela Rayner – Tories are militant. Getting rid of right to
protest. Education. Rebuilding socialism outside of Labour In
this third article of a three-part series – former Corbyn staffer Phil
Bevin looks at the prospects for real change – and how to achieve it
outside a Labour party whose regime no longer represents even the vaguest
idea of genuine socialism
Real, lasting change doesn’t come from negotiating for crumbs from the
establishment’s table but working with communities to help them claim
power for themselves. This means talking to people, finding out their
concerns, and campaigning to ensure that the holders of power are held to
account, and the system they serve contested at elections. In large parts
of the country, this kind of activism is impossible to achieve through
the Labour Party because its representatives are the local establishment.
Many of us who are trying to contribute to progressive change end up
fighting against the Labour Party. ‘Labour and its associated culture of
managerialism should be allowed to die’ For instance, I live in
Birmingham, where Labour controls the City Council. Despite having £500
million in reserve, at least £50 million of which is unallocated, the
housing conditions are appalling, even slum-like. Flats suffer from damp,
cockroach infestations, urine in lifts, and overcrowding. It should be a
scandal, but Momentum and the Labour left have done nothing to address
it, perhaps because highlighting the problems would mean damaging the
image of the party they represent. Even worse, at election time, Momentum
and the Labour left will most likely be out knocking on doors urging
people to vote for the very Councillors that presided over this misery.
For socialism to thrive in my area and elsewhere, Labour and its
associated culture of establishment approved managerialism should be
allowed to die….
Talking of fake socialists… Boycott of Mayor Marvin’s Press briefings
– since Local Democracy Reporters banned When the Post’s other LDR Adam
Postans asked to attend the next briefing he was told LDRs were now not
allowed to attend, in a move that has been branded as “anti-democratic”
by the National Union of Journalists.
The council has since denied the claim, saying LDRs have not been banned
from the briefings but that it was part of a “long-standing agreement”
for them not to attend. However, that did not stop the BBC, Bristol World
and Bristol 24/7 as well as Bristol Live saying they would boycott future
meetings until the LDRs are allowed to attend. The local democracy
reporting service sees the BBC fund 165 local democracy reporters across
the UK to report on local authorities in partner newsrooms, like Bristol
Live. A BBC spokesperson said: “We are deeply disappointed by the
decision taken by the mayor’s office to not allow the Bristol LDR into
his fortnightly press conference. “It is an essential ingredient of local
democracy that journalists should be able to ask robust, challenging
questions to people in power. “We have today informed the mayor that the
BBC won’t be attending the fortnightly mayoral briefings until this
important issue is resolved. We will continue to report on the city
council and mayor as normal by attending all other meetings.” Bristol
Live senior editor Pete Gavan told Press Gazette it was “great to get
this support” in boycotting the mayoral briefings and challenged the
council’s claim that they had agreed not to send LDRs. Instead, according
to Gavan, they had said they would send other reporters “when possible”
but reserve the right to send LDRs. “We do not accept that any reporters
should be banned from attending meetings at the behest of the council,
nor from asking relevant questions on behalf of our readers and council
taxpayers at any time,” he added. The National Union of Journalists’
Reach national coordinator Chris Morley argued that the actions of the
council were “arrogant, high-handed, and essentially anti-democratic” and
said “the slur it implies on the professionalism of our LDR members is
thoroughly rejected”. Bristol24/7 editor Martin Booth said it was a
“slippery slope” if journalists let the council choose who “they want to
attend briefings and who they want to exclude”. He added: “Marvin Rees
has previously said that his motto is ‘ask me anything’. I hope that he
will live up to that motto and lift this ban on LDRs. Until that happens,
Bristol24/7 will neither be attending nor covering any mayoral press
conferences.”
5 year
decline in trust of media – Press Gazette
Five-year
decline in UK news media trust sees BBC, Times and Telegraph have biggest
drops
– The
Times, The Telegraph and the BBC have suffered the biggest drops in trust
among UK news media over the past five years, according to one annual
survey.
The
Times was named the most trusted UK newspaper brand in 2018 but has
since seen trust fall by 20 percentage points to 43%, according Press
Gazette analysis of annual data from the
Reuters
Institute for the Study of Journalism.
The BBC also saw a
20 percentage point drop in trust since 2018, although its fall from 75%
to 55% still leaves it as the most trusted news brand in the UK, jointly
with ITV News and just ahead of Channel 4 News on 54%.
A BBC
spokesperson said: Although we are never complacent, our own independent
research shows that we saw a boost to perceptions of BBC News
trustworthiness and impartiality during the pandemic, and BBC News is the
source adults in the UK are most likely to turn to for impartial news on
the biggest news stories of the day. Meanwhile,
The
Telegraph saw a 19 percentage point drop, from 55% of consumers
saying they trusted its output in 2018 to 36% in 2022, as it maintained
its position as the least trusted broadsheet in the UK.
Nicola Sturgeon and another Scottish referendum. PMQs deportation
charter flights of immigrants. ‘Completely illegal!’ Nicola Sturgeon
facing ‘political suicide’ over second referendum NICOLA STURGEON is
facing “political suicide” over her planned second independence
referendum, a commentator has claimed, saying the vote may be “completely
illegal”.
Former Scottish Conservative councillor Tony Miklinski said Ms Sturgeon
“knows perfectly well” a second referendum is not going to be granted by
a Conservative Government, bringing its legality into “severe doubt”. He
said Ms Sturgeon is “boxing herself into an almost impossible situation”,
as she has “always said” she won’t hold an illegal referendum. Mr
Miklinski warned the Scottish First Minister it would be “political
suicide” to lose the vote. Earlier this week, Ms Sturgeon said she plans
to hold a referendum on October 19 2023, despite the UK Government so far
refusing to grant Scotland permission to do so. In January 2020, Boris
Johnson refused Scotland permission to hold another referendum,
describing the 2014 vote as a “once in a generation” event. But Ms
Sturgeon has said plans are underway to ensure the Scottish parliament
could proceed with a vote lawfully. On Tuesday, she announced Scotland’s
top law officer, Lord Advocate Dorothy Bain, had asked the Supreme Court
for a decision on whether an advisory second referendum could be within
Holyrood’s powers.
Bitchute
video of complete show
Part Two – Ukraine/Covid/Climate Round-Up With End Times Prophecy
Reports
War in Ukraine. Rocket in shopping centre – not Russian? Western
reporting of war written in Kiev.
Erdogan says Sweden and Finland joining NATO could be blocked if
memorandum isn’t followed. NATO want to widen the
conflict. Isolation of West. NATO false flag tactics. Is
Russias Bombing of the Mall in Kremanchuk Another False Atrocity Story
Being Used to Justify Ongoing Military Intervention in
Ukraine?
Empty mall parking lot and existence of a munitions plant nearby raise
questions about official narrative advanced in mainstream U.S. media On
Tuesday June 28, mainstream media outlets reported that at least 18
people were killed and dozens injured in a Russian missile strike on a
crowded shopping mall in the central Ukrainian city of Kremenchuk on
Monday. Thirty-six other people were said to be missing and a survivor
was on record saying that she had been shopping with her husband when the
blast threw her into the air. The Associated Press, Reuters, The New York
Times, NPR and other news outlets reporting on the story used Ukrainian
government officials as their primary source, notably Mayor Vitaliy
Maletskiywho wrote on Facebook that the attack hit a very crowded area,
which is 100% certain not to have any links to the armed forces. But they
made no independent investigation as to the truth of the self-serving
statement. Also without verification they quoted Ukrainian President
Volodymyr Zelenskywho said in a Telegram post that the number of victims
was
unimaginable, and cited reports that
more than 1,000 civilians were inside at the time of the
attack. However,
other reports contradict Zelensky and suggest that
the Russian missile attack in Kremenchuk is just one more false story
about alleged Russian atrocities known to have been fabricated by
Ukraines very active propaganda mill….
Naomi Wolf and
Naomi Klein twitter spat. Naomi Wolf on the Mark Steyn show on GB
News – companies benefiting from Covid vaccines and lockdowns.
Online Safety Bill.
Lord Frost – bill should be scrapped – Mail. Institute of Economic
Affairs – report on Online Safety Bill concluding freedom of speech
is threatened –
The scope of the Bill is “breathtaking”, and raises significant issues
for free speech, privacy and innovation. The establishment of safety
duties, under the threat of multi-billion pound fines and criminal
sanctions, risks digital platforms using automated tools in a cautious
and censorious manner. This will embolden bad faith actors to seek
content removals. The Secretary of State and Ofcom will have
unprecedented powers to define and limit speech, with limited
parliamentary or judicial oversight. The definition of harmful speech can
be easily expanded through a statutory instrument, depending on the
priorities of the incumbent Secretary of State. For example, the Shadow
DCMS Secretary Lucy Powell clearly envisages an extension of the notion
of ‘harmful’ to cover matters of public policy debate, having raised
concerns that the Bill would allow ‘climate deniers’ to ‘slip through the
net’. Privacy risks are raised by encouraging or requiring identity and
age verification and proactive monitoring of user content by platforms.
The Bill even applies this to private messaging, like WhatsApp. The
Bill’s byzantine requirements will impose large regulatory costs,
particularly on start-ups and smaller companies, and make it riskier to
host content and develop innovative services. This risks discouraging
investment, and cementing the market position of ‘Big Tech’ companies who
can afford to comply. The impact assessment estimates that the Bill will
cost businesses £2.5 billion over the first ten years, but this
underestimates the direct costs (it claims legal fees are just £39.23 per
hour) and does not even attempt to assess the potential costs to
innovation, competition or international trade. There is a lack of
evidence to justify the legislation, with respect to both the alleged
prevalence of what the Bill treats as ‘harm’ and the link between the
proposed measures and the desired objectives.
https://iea.org.uk/media/online-safety-bill-hands-unprecedented-censorship-powers-to-secretary-of-state-and-ofcom-warns-new-research/
Online safety bill could impose ‘unprecedented’ censorship powers A
new briefing paper by free market think tank the Institute of Economic
Affairs (IEA) says the government’s flagship online safety bill will have
a significant impact on free speech, privacy and innovation.
The paper highlights the broad scope, complexity and reach of the bill,
at over 255 pages, an increase of 110 pages since the May 2021 draft. The
bill’s proposed establishment of safety duties, under the threat of
multi-billion pound fines and criminal sanctions, risks digital platforms
using automated tools in a cautious and censorious manner. This will
embolden bad faith actors to seek content removals. The IEA also say the
bill’s “byzantine” requirements will impose large regulatory costs,
particularly on start-ups and smaller companies, and make it riskier to
host content and develop innovative services. This could discourage
investment, and cement the market position of “Big Tech” companies who
can afford to comply. The impact assessment estimates that the bill will
cost businesses £2.5 billion over the first ten years. However this
underestimates the direct costs by claiming legal fees are just £39.23
per hour, and does not attempt to assess the potential costs to
innovation, competition or international trade. There is a lack of
evidence to justify the legislation, with respect to both the alleged
prevalence of what the bill treats as “harm” and the link between the
proposed measures and the desired objectives. The paper claims that the
bill’s new duties will impose unprecedented censorship on lawful speech,
through removal of suspected illegal content to ensure compliance and
duties in relation to content that is allegedly harmful but not illegal.
Platforms like Facebook, YouTube and Twitter will be expected to take
action against speech if they “reasonably consider” it could be illegal,
a significantly lower standard then “beyond reasonable doubt”. If they
fail to do so, the companies can be fined up to 10 per cent of global
revenue. The new harms-based communication offence in the bill outlaws
intentionally causing psychological distress. The IEA say this risks
empowering the easily offended and bad faith actors to solicit removals
of legal speech from platforms. The Secretary of State will be able to
direct Ofcom to change codes of practice “for reasons of public policy”
and will set Ofcom’s priorities. Ofcom, through codes of conduct, will be
able to decide what content could be “harmful” and thus set, and
therefore potentially limit, the bounds of online free speech. The report
argues that the bill’s free speech protections are very weak – the bill
only establishes a duty on platforms to “have regard” to the importance
of protecting users’ freedom of expression. Shadow DCMS Secretary Lucy
Powell has even envisaged an extension of the notion of “harmful” to
cover matters of public policy debate, having raised concerns that the
bill would allow “climate deniers” to “slip through the
net”.
Lilani Dowding
on the Mark Steyn show, GB News – ‘The online harms bill is just so
dangerous to free
speech’ |
Leilani Dowding reacts to bill – vaccine injury and fact
checkers. Study into myocarditis and pericarditis after MRNa Covid
vaccines
Healthy young people are dying suddenly and unexpectedly from a
mysterious syndrome –
as doctors seek answers through a new national register People aged under
the age of 40 being urged to go and get their hearts checked May
potentially be at risk of having Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS) SADS
is an ‘umbrella term to describe unexpected deaths in young people’ A
31-year-old woman who died in her sleep last year may have had
SADs
Vladimir
Zelenko, Trump’s Doctor, dies – contribution Covid made to the collapse
of US Super Power – spiritual dimension to his work and the miracle of
life.
Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, who touted unconventional COVID treatment, dies
at
49
US physician, who served as Kiryas Joel community doctor for decades
before parting ways, rose to fame in 2020 when his virus treatment was
endorsed by then-president Trump American family physician Dr. Vladimir
“Zev” Zelenko, who rose to fame during the early stages of the COVID-19
pandemic by promoting an unconventional treatment for the virus, died on
Thursday after battling cancer for several years. He was 49. elenko, an
Orthodox Jew born in Kyiv, moved to the United States with his family at
the age of three, settling in Brooklyn, New York City. He received his
medical degree from the State University of New York at Buffalo in 2000.
He had served as the community doctor of Kiryas Joel, a town north of New
York City, for nearly two decades, and was regarded by many as a beloved
member of the community. In May 2020, however, he said he was leaving the
Kiryas Joel community, where he had practiced medicine for years,
following a fall-out with community leaders who publicly spoke out about
his approach to the pandemic. Zelenko had developed the “Zelenko
Protocol,” an experimental treatment for COVID-19 consisting of the
anti-malarial medication hydroxychloroquine, the antibiotic azithromycin,
and zinc sulfate and claimed to have successfully treated hundreds of
patients using the three-drug combination over the course of five
days.
Henry Widdas,
Journalist, on NUJ’s work of protecting Journalists though Covid – and
Julian Assange.
Piers Corbyn went to Just Stop Oil protest to convince them they’re wrong
– CO2 follows climate change – article that explains why
Piers Corbyn and ‘Freedom Five’ fined for breaching Covid-19 rules during
anti-lockdown
protests
Piers Corbyn has been fined after breaching Covid-19 restrictions during
a series of anti-lockdown protests in central London last year. The
75-year-old brother of former Labour leader Jeremy was found guilty at
Westminster Magistrates’ Court on Wednesday of participating in four
different gatherings of more people than restrictions allowed at the time
between August 29 and December 31 2020. He was fined £750 and had to pay
£275 in prosecution costs and £109 in surcharges following the incidents
in Trafalgar Square, Westminster and South Bank, the Metropolitan Police
said. The offences involved gatherings of more than 30 people at a time
when regulations stated no-one could participate in groups of more than
six outdoors unless certain exemptions applied. Fellow protesters Vincent
Dunmall, 55, from Orpington, south-east London, and Louise Creffield, 36,
of Brighton, were also found guilty of taking part in three of the
gatherings between August 29 and October 24 2020.
supplement - - - >
Enclosure For Empire: Witchcraft, Freemasonry and Oliver
Cromwell
STROUD
22Jun22 – Certain facts about the origins of the 1642-49 English Civil
war have been established by historians and University departments over
the centuries. Central are the grievances over Charles’s arbitrary rule
and ‘three monopolies’ of church, printing and trade, that so stifled
enterprise and free thought.
But what if there were a ‘third factor’, carefully concealed by wealthy
merchants who were on the cusp of exploiting the New World? ‘Dark forces’
with a hidden agenda sniffed at by establishment historians then and now,
because to raise it might threaten their reputations, their careers? Just
such a possibility has in fact been creeping out, ‘given legs’ since
WWII, in the works of Christopher Hill, Henry Brailsford, Pauline Gregg,
John Robinson, Stephen Knight and Martin Short.
These writers represent two new perspectives on the seventeenth century
battle between the feudal and merchant classes in England that was to
have enormous repercussions across the world, not least of which was
laying the foundatons for the acquisition of the biggest empire the world
has ever seen.
Hill and Brailsford writing and researching in the 1956s and 1970s
represent the post-war socialist culture finding its feet and
reinterpreting social history, much research from original writings being
made public for the first time. Their books tease out the social
struggles and aspirations of the vast majority of England’s illiterate
poor who had no voice yet were seeing their rights to land and livelihood
and freedom of worship being corralled as they were made destitute by
eviction and rabid anti-Catholicism.
In the 1970s and 80s insiders were saying Freemasonry was becoming less
Christian, more sinister. Darker leaders were allegedly creeping in and
whistleblowers began to speak out. These disclosures fell on fertile soil
because publishing and broadcasting was in the middle of taboo-breaking
couple of decades. Stephen Knight and Martin Short were writing in the
1980s about Freemasonry, complex deceptions and links into all aspects of
power, at the highest offices of state and the criminal justice system
were exposed.
Before tackling Freemasonry head on, Knight’s 1976 book ‘Jack the Ripper
the Final Solution’ suggested prostitutes deaths had been ordered by the
royal family after they received blackmail threats. The eldest son of
king Edward VII, heir to the throne Prince Albert Victor, had been
experimenting with prostitutes as a teenager, given one a child and
married her under a pseudonym.
Due to the Masonic nature of the cover-up, Knight became a focus for
1970/80s Masons, disgruntled over more recent injustices within the
craft. In 1984 the product of that research ‘The Brotherhood’ was
published but Stephen Knight died shortly afterwards in 1985 aged 34.
Journalist Martin Short was handed several boxes of unread correspondence
Knight had received from readers and published his own, bigger, sequel
‘Inside The Brotherhood, Further Secrets of the Freemasons’ in
1989.
Freemasonry being a re-branding of the banned medieval Knights Templar
cult is probably best detailed in John Robinson’s book ‘Born In Blood’
(1989). During the same period of relative press freedom Christian
converts from secret black and white witch covens reported identical
wording in the oaths of Masonic initiation rituals: promises of secrecy
on pain of death, even methods of execution of ‘offenders’.
The Vatican’s inability, or unwillingness, to try accusations of
witchcraft had been one of the many reformation grievances. As Henry VIII
finally wrenched English Christendom away from Rome in December 1633,
over the marriage to Anne Boleyn, the English church began a
popularisation and freeing-up of Christian doctrine and practice which
included dealing much more directly with accusations of
witchcraft.
This took place over the century or so between the reformation and
English civil war as a spiritual battle raged to deal with evidence of
divination and sorcery which the Vatican had swept under the carpet. This
extension of the crown’s judicial powers also provided ‘cover’ for Thomas
Cromwell’s hostile takeover of the monasteries, and execution of several
abbots, to which the king owed vast sums of money.
A look beyond the turbulent John Dee’s empire plan, Witch trials and
Enclosure does seem to confirm this interpretation of secret societies in
a kind of spiritual battle behind the scenes for legislative influence
which will benefit them, running up to the power to hire and fire the
monarch.
Between the outing of the Templars, and Elizabeth I, came the too-little
studied nor understood Wars of the Roses. Understood as a battle for
succession between the houses of York and Lancaster it can also be seen
as the ultimately fruitless attempt to crush the Lancastrian power of the
secretive Garter Knights. It was only with the coming of the 1485 Battle
of Bosworth that this argument was finally settled in the garter knights
favour. Sporadic bands of possibly state-sponsored brigands that had been
roaming a lawless country for over a century were apprehended, and the
English countryside was allowed to return to a reasonably peaceful
existence.
Similarly after the 1688 ‘Glorious Revolution’ there was a considerable
reservoir of learned noble distrust of the new protestant kings,
considered illegitimate usurpers by the ‘Jacobites’. The name referred to
King James and the Bible-believing Stuart line which had been overthrown
by these ‘dark forces’. This even extended in 1745 to a great march to
attack London by the Highlanders and their allies which, probably wisely,
was abandoned in Derby and returned home.
It should not come as a great surprise that Freemasonry might be lurking
behind machinations of the English Civil War since the idea was prominent
in some seventeenth and eighteenth century accounts and illustrations.
But this aspect has become less prominent today because mainstream
historians tell us Freemasonry only emerged in England in 1717.
‘Emerged’ is the word, because ‘philanthropist’ Elias Ashmole proudly
records his own 1646 initiation into freemasonry at Warrington in his
memoirs. So we know ‘the craft’ was active underground from at least the
civil war period in England. Was the 1717 deception an attempt to conceal
some role Freemasonry’s hidden networks of power had in the overthrow of
Charles I, and the later usurping of James Stuart’s throne in 1688 by
‘puritan’ William of Orange?
Timeline
- 1118 – The Vatican founds the Knights Templar after the First
Crusade
- 1154 – The Great Schism as rival pontiffs from the Roman and Orthodox
churches split
- 1204 – Sacking of Orthodox Constantinople led by Knights Templar of
the Vatican’s Fourth Crusade
- Friday 13th October 1307 – French King Philip the Fair orders arrest
of the Templars for denying Christ, homosexuality, worshipping idols plus
other blasphemies and heresies.
- 1312 – Templar Order is extinguished by the Vatican and banning
decrees issued by European kings. Property is transferred to the Knights
Hospitaller, today known as the Knights of Malta. Templars now have to go
underground, under false names staying in secret network of ‘safe houses’
known as ‘lodges’.
-
1348 – Order of the Garter is created by Edward III at Woodstock,
Oxfordshire with 26 knights. Legend is the motto ‘Shame on anyone who
thinks this is evil’, originated when the Countess of Salisbury, dancing
with the king, dropped her garter and he gallantly picked it up. However
in her 1921 anthropological study of witchcraft Margaret Murray says the
garter is a hidden emblem of a witchcraft high priestess, indicating
control of a coven of 13, and that the king may have been demonstrating
his support for her.
- 1381 – Peasant’s Revolt believed to have been orchestrated by the
underground Templars to threaten the boy-King Richard II and regain or
destroy property lost seventy years previously when they were
extinguished.
-
1411 – Foundation of London’s Guildhall, bringing medieval guilds
together, leading to increased insularity and profiteering through shared
monopolistic practices. Guilds had been getting more formalised and
secretive over the previous 200 years or so with oaths of initiation to
protect the secrets of their craft. Livery Companies began to dominate
the political and economic life of the City of London through
monopolistic practices and controlling apprenticeships. In the 21st
Century there remain 84 City companies, the ‘Great Twelve’ Mercers,
Grocers, Drapers, Fishmongers, Goldsmiths, Skinners, Merchant-Taylors,
Haberdashers, Salters, Ironmongers, Vintners, Clothworkers and 72 minor
companies.
- 1446 – Rosslyn Chapel is built in Midlothian, Southeast of ex-Templar
Port Edinburgh by Sir William St Clair. Architecture hints at Templar
influences and pillars depict plants only known in the Americas, which
weren’t supposed to have been discovered until fifty years afterwards.
- 1455-1487 – Wars of the Roses dynastic battles over thirty years tied
up with England losing control of French territories with sides
symbolised by the white Lancastrian and red Yorkshire five-pointed roses,
sometimes depicted as white within red as the Tudor Rose. Because the
five-petalled rose is a form of hexagram some have suggested that it
represents the merging of Lancastrian and Yorkist covens. Wars culminate
both dynastically, in the 1486 marriage of Henry VII to Elisabeth of
York, eldest daughter of Edward IV, and militarily in the 1487 Battle of
Bosworth where Henry Tudor’s Yorkist rival Richard III is killed.
- 1489 – Depopulation Act ‘Against Pulling Down Of Towns’ under Henry
VII
- 1492-97 – So-called discovery of South America and Caribbean by
Christopher Columbus who sailed from Palos de la Frontera in Spain and
North America by John Cabot sailing out of Bristol. There is much
evidence that the ancient Phoenicians traded across the Atlantic, that
some Europeans were aware of the ‘New World’ and that these voyages may
have simply made public what elites already knew, to prepare Europeans
for coming centuries of colonisation.
- 1515 – Royal Proclamation ‘Against Engrossing Of Farms’ under Henry
VIII
- 1516 – Depopulation Act
- 1516, 1518 and 1519 – Royal Anti-Enclosure Commissions
- 1534 – Sheep Farming Restraining Act
- 1536 – Two Depopulation Acts
- 1536 – 1541 – The English Reformation is beginning in earnest with a
frontal attack on the commercial operations of the church. Dissolution of
the Monasteries by Oliver Cromwell’s great-great grandfather and Henry
VIII’s chief minister Thomas Cromwell – 900 religious business
institutions are ‘nationalised’ and sold off. 12,000 in religious orders
are sacked as the debt the crown owes to the great monastic institutions,
tens of billions of pounds in 2020 money, is cancelled. With Luther and
Calvin’s wider ‘Reformation’ comes a tacit encouragement of Freemason
lodges, as secret ‘speakeasies’ until emerging officially into public
view 180 years or so later.
- 1542 – Henry VIII passes England’s first capital Witchcraft Act
removing jurisdiction from the Vatican’s church courts to the crown
courts and assizes.
- 1549, Jul-Aug – Kett’s Rebellion in Norfolk over enclosure. East
Anglia ruled for seven weeks from under an oak tree by Robert Kett and
16,000 peasants. Enclosers locked up in Norwich jail for ‘stealing the
land’. King Edward VI’s army is twice turned back by the rebels, is then
reinforced and defeats them.
- 1552 and 1555 Depopulation Acts
- 1563 – Depopulation Act repeals all four 1526, 1552 and 1555 Acts as
ineffective. Acknowledged or not, this was probably because the
administration of all previous acts and commissions since 1489 were in
the hands of the landed classes who were profiting personally from
enclosure.
- 1563 – Post-Reformation ‘Witchcraft Act’, passed in Scotland, makes
witchcraft, or consulting with witches, a capital crime.
- 1563 – Elizabeth I’s Witchcraft Act reduces penalties for witchcraft
except it remains a capital offence for those proven also to have caused
harm.
- 1577 – John Dee privately publishes his clandestine vision for the
ascendancy of a projected British Empire, advised by Christopher Hatton
and Robert Dudley, for Elizabeth I in ‘General and Rare Memorials
Pertayning to the Perfect Arte of Navigation’. Though part of Dee’s plan,
Elizabeth claims privateers Francis Drake, Walter Raleigh and John
Hawkins are not working for the crown. [FFI see articles by Alex Grover,
National Maritime Museum, Greenwich]
- 1580 – Sir Francis Drake circumnavigates the world.
- 1581-1795 – Calvinist ‘Dutch Republic’, where Catholics are
persecuted. It is to play a major role in providing finance and military
expertise to Cromwell during the English civil war. Following the 1660
restoration of Charles II the Dutch republic resumes harrying England’s
Catholic kings with the 1665 Monmouth rebellion and much better funded
1688 ‘Glorious revolution’ which finally deposes the Stuart line and
imposes a violently anti-Catholic regime.
- 1590-92 – North Berwick witch trials in which Agnes Sampson,
Geillis Duncan and schoolmaster Dr John Fian were accused of being
members of a coven at St Andrews’ Auld Kirk. Around 100 people were
accused including Francis Stewart, 5th Earl of Bothwell and other gentry.
It’s unclear how many the juries found guilty or were executed.
- 1593 – Two final Depopulation Acts passed
- 1597 – James VI of Scotland publishes his ‘Daemonologie’ purporting
to detail practices and enable identification of witches.
- 1600 – Incorporation of the East India Company which began
controlling trade for empire in Bengal, India and the far east.
- 1603, 24 March – James I ascends to the throne of England
having been James VI of Scotland for 36 years, uniting the two
monarchies.
- 1604 – James I passes a stricter Witchcraft Act reversing Elizabeth
I’s leniency. It is enforced by self-styled ‘Witchfinder General’ Matthew
Hopkins.
- 1604-1607 active enclosure revolts in Northamptonshire, Bedfordshire,
Buckinghamshire, Huntingdonshire, Leicestershire, Lincolnshire and
Warwickshire, culminating in 1607 in armed revolt under a leader with the
pseudonym ‘Captain Pouch’. Forty or fifty rebels out of a rag-tag-army of
about a thousand peasants are shot dead at Newton by a ‘body of mounted
gentlemen with their servants’, while several others are hanged and
quartered.
- 1605, 05 November – Gunpowder plot orchestrated by Lord Salisbury to
test James I and justify persecution of Catholics
- 1607 – the term ‘Leveller’ is heard for the first time as organised
anti-enclosure gangs emerge and ‘riots’ spread around the counties of
Northamptonshire, Warwickshire and Leicestershire.
- 1607 – 1636 the governments of James I and Charles I set themselves
against John Dee’s covert empire-building by pursuing an active
anti-enclosure policy.
- 1611 – Publication of King James’ Authorised Version of The Bible,
commissioned in 1604 and still recognised as one of the most accurate..
- 1612, 18-19 August – Pendle witch trials culminating in nine hangings
for Maleficium (causing injury by divination) of some self-confessed
coven-members on 20th August.
- 1620 – Voyage of The Mayflower from Plymouth to Cape Cod
setting up the first official North American colony.
- 1625, 27 March – Charles I ascends the British throne on death of
James I
- 1626 June – Parliament impeaches Charles I’s friend and adviser
George Villiers, 2nd Duke of Buckingham so Charles quickly dissolves
Parliament.
- 1629-1640 – ‘Eleven years Tyranny’ as Charles I attempts to rule
without Parliament
- 1629-1640 – The Providence Island Company, with John Pym MP as
treasurer, becomes the organisational base for mercantile Puritan
opposition to the king and his attempts to rule without parliament.
Supposedly set up to open trade with Spanish in Latin America the company
becomes a centre for domestic legal, political and military opposition to
Charles I. Located 150 miles east of Nicaragua’s Mosquito Coast
Providence island is ostensibly a model Puritan colony but is used by
English Privateers as a base from which to attack Spanish shipping. The
Phoenicians (2500-500BC) had also used offshore islands to manage
trade and as a base to operate against territories they wished to
control.
- 1630 – Justices of five midland counties are ordered to remove all
enclosures made in the previous two years
- 1632, 1635 and 1636 – Three Royal Anti-Enclosure Commissions levy
huge compositions, or fines, on those who have enclosed land in
contravention of Depopulation Acts. Charles I levies total of £50,000
‘compositions’, or fines, as a penalty for depopulation and evictions
from 1633 to 1638, some of which are retrospective. Equivalent in 2020 of
around £2.2 billion.
- 1635 – Supposedly converted to Christianity Portuguese-Jewish
merchant Antonio Fernandez Carvajal moves to London’s Leadenhall Street
as the first endenizened, or naturalised, English Jew for nearly 200
years. His ships trade to the East and West Indies, Brazil, and Levant in
gunpowder, wine, hides, pictures, cochineal and corn. Plus he has
lucrative government contracts to supply the army with corn and an
additional £100,000 annual turnover of silver. Carvajal also brings with
him a vast intelligence network of paid informers, of use to any army.
- 1635 – Charles imposes Ship Money tax to finance the Royal Navy on
inland towns and cities which had previously levied only on ports.
- 13 April – 5 May 1640 – ‘Short Parliament’ summoned by Charles I
which insisted on grievances against the king being addressed before
voting him any money. Charles then promptly dissolved it.
- November 1640 – December 1648 – ‘Long Parliament’ elected. Earl of
Strafford (d. May 1641), Cottington, Sir John Finch (escaped to Holland)
and Archbishop Laud (d. 1645), who have been running the country for the
king, are impeached and either executed or escaped into exile until the
restoration.
- November 1641 – Parliament states its demands that the king strictly
purge the church of England of all ‘Roman Catholic tenancies’ in the
‘Grand Remonstrance’ drafted by Puritan John Pym.
- On 4th January 1642 king Charles attempts to arrest the ‘five
members’ John Pym, John Hampden, Arthur Hesilrige, Denzil Holles and
William Strode for treason. Charles had first gone to the House of Lords
demanding they arrest the MPs for him. After a short debate the Lords
refused and so Charles and his accompanying guard of soldiers had to go
into the Commons themselves to make the arrests. Charles utters the
opening line of the English Civil War, “All the birds are flown”
and humiliated, leaves London. We now know the five members were already
safely hidden in the City of London, which had probably been tipped off
by a spy at court.
- 10 June 1642 – Charles I is forced to leave London for Oxford,
establishing his rule in other parts of the country with a virtual line
of his support running roughly from Southampton up to Hull. Roughly 1/3
of MPs and the majority of Lords support the king.
- 22nd August 1642 – Charles raises his standard at Nottingham hoping
loyal aristocracy will support him against Parliament. Later in the month
Parliament orders al theatres closed.
- 23rd October 1642 – Battle of Edge Hill between Banbury and
Stratford-on-Avon in Warwickshire proves indecisive with around 15,000
troops on each side.
- 20 September 1643 – First Battle of Newbury in Berkshire again proves
indecisive as the King tries and fails to stop Essex returning to London
from Gloucester.
- 2nd July 1644 – Battle of Marston Moor is a decisive Parliamentary
victory near York. Prince Rupert, for the King, took on Cromwell and
Fairfax with Edward Manchester in command of the parliamentary army.
Confusion reigned on both sides that day but Manchester grabbed the
initiative, routing the royalist army inflicting crippling losses, with
4,000 of Charles’ fighting men killed and 1,500 captured. Manchester’s
decisive performance as a general that day led to conflict with Cromwell
later that year over the conduct of the war. Manchester was dismissed,
eventually opposing the trial of Charles I from sidelines.
- February 1645: Sums of money which prove to be decisive are spent
over the winter refashioning the parliamentary army for what proved to be
the decisive 1645 fighting season. Parliament’s New Model Army of 20,000
soldiers is better equipped, disciplined and trained.
- 14 June 1645 – Battle of Naseby, South of Market Harborough, is the
final decisive defeat of the English Civil War. Charles I joined Prince
Rupert to command 7,500 cavaliers, who faced around 14,000 New Model Army
Roundheads led by Cromwell and Fairfax. 5,000 royalist soldiers are
captured leaving Charles’ forces in the midlands decimated and the cities
of Leicester, Chester and Winchester all saw the writing on the wall,
surrendering to parliament.
- 10th July 1645 Langport in Somerset saw the Royalists’ final
strategic military defeat. Soldiers of Charles’ supporters in the South
West were defeated by Fairfax and his well-organised, City of London
resourced, army. Bristol merchants had been independent royalists, and
remained so until the following September when, under siege, they
surrendered England’s second city to the roundheads. So furious was
Cromwell with Bristol for holding an independent line against his
merchant forces, he had his engineers level the city’s historic castle
with explosives after the war.
- July 1645: Leveller pamphleteer Lt. Col. John Lilburne is arrested
- Elizabeth Lilburne women’s petition to parliament
- 1646 – in his memoirs Elias Ashmole records his initiation into
freemasonry at Warrington sixty years before Freemasonry is supposed to
exist in England
- 12 November 1646 – Charles I loses the battle of Newark and is taken
into custody by the Scottish army
- January 1647 – Scots deliver Charles over to parliament for the sum
of £100,000
- June 1647 – trouble at’ mill – Cromwell settles with army agitators
- June and July 1647 – letters pass between Oliver Cromwell and
Amsterdam’s Mulheim Synagogue financier Ebenezer Pratt about Jews being
readmitted to England in exchange for his financial support and advice.
- 11 November 1647 – Charles is deliberately allowed to escape from
Hampton Court for pro-Cromwell dramatic effect and makes his way to the
Isle Of Wight, from where he plans to escape to France. IoW governor
Colonel Robert Hammond is not so sympathetic as Charles had hoped and he
is re-imprisoned in Carisbrooke castle.
- August 1648 King Charles I is taken prisoner.
-
September 1648 – In his pamphlet ‘Les Francs-Maçons Écrasés’ (1774)
French Catholic priest Abbé Larudan alleges Cromwell, realising his own
life will be forfeit if negotiations for peace with Charles proceed,
forms a witchcraft cell to push through the execution Charles, under
Masonic guise. The inauguration takes place at a location in King’s
Street, St. James, London over two evening meetings four days apart.
Named as present are
Oliver
Cromwell, his son-in-law
Henry Ireton,
Algernon
Sidney, a Mr. Newell, Martin Wildeman,
James Harrington (colonel of the London trained bands),
George Monck Parliamentary
commander-in-chief
Thomas Fairfax
along with many others. The ‘holy spirit’ is said to have visited
Cromwell during the intervening days to affirm god’s support for him and
his group. The ostensible aim is the rebuilding of ‘proper Christian
order’ and once they have been inducted at their second meeting a
painting of Solomon’s ruined Temple is presented to initiates in a
neighbouring room, illustrating the ‘task in hand’. A master, two
wardens, a secretary and speaker are all appointed as this newly formed
cult’s officers which consists of all factions in Parliament, church and
army. It proceeds to spy on MPs to assess their views on negotiation with
or trial of Charles I in preparation for Pride’s purge three months
later. So, did Cromwell ‘do a deal with the devil’? Exactly a decade
later Cromwell is dead. Rumours survive about Cromwell ‘selling his soul
to the devil’ at the 1651 battle of Worcester.
- 20 November 1648 – Cromwell’s son-in-law Henry Ireton’s Remonstrance
is presented to Parliament calling for the trial of Charles I for
treason.
- 2 December 1648 Charles I is held in Hurst Castle
- On 1st December, the House of Commons resists Ireton’s calls to
proceed to try the king, voting by 129 to 83, a majority of 46 votes, to
accept the King’s terms for his restoration to power.
- The following day the New Model Army occupies London and arrests 41
MPs who had most actively supported the king, hoping that this will send
a clear message to the others, if just a few of those remaining who
support the king change their mind no further action by the army will be
necessary.
- 6 December 1648 – The Rump Parliament is created with Pride’s Purge.
Acting on orders from Cromwell’s son-in-law General Henry Ireton, and
apparently unknown to army chief General Fairfax, Colonel Thomas Pride
surrounds parliament with troops and ‘purges’ Parliament of a further 140
or so MPs who had voted for the negotiated settlement with Charles. This
leaves only 71 out of the originally elected 489 MPs still sitting, the
so-called ‘Rump Parliament’. Around two hundred of the Long Parliament’s
original MPs are now in prison and around the same number in fear of the
army, afraid to speak out. Ninety MPs, the majority of those who voted
the previous day to negotiate with the king, are purged from parliament
along with 45 who resisted arrest detained for several days. Those
considered most dangerous to Cromwell’s cause. Sir William Waller, Sir
John Clotworthy and Lionel Copley are imprisoned in the tower without
charge for many years. Denzil Holles, Colonel Massey and Major-General
Browne escape to the continent.
- 4th January 1649 a motion is but before parliament proposing the king
be tried for treason. Only 46 of the Rump’s 71 MPs turn up to vote and 26
vote in favour, a majority of six is enough. The following day the Lords
vote overwhelmingly against the same motion, but the vote is set aside by
the then government, Cromwell’s Council of State. General Henry Ireton’s
demand that Charles be put on trial is now voted through. In public
Oliver Cromwell said he had his doubts about the purges and at the end of
December he tells the House of Commons “the providence of God hath cast
this upon us”. Once the decision had been made Cromwell “threw himself
into it with the vigour he always showed when his mind was made up, when
God had spoken”.
-
20 January 1649 – a court is convened in Westminster Hall and Charles I
is charged with “waging war on Parliament.” It was claimed that he was
responsible for “all the murders, burnings, damages and mischiefs to the
nation” in the English Civil War. The jury included remaining members of
Parliament, army officers and large landowners. Some of the 135 jurors
did not turn up for the trial. For example. General Thomas Fairfax, the
leader of the Parliamentary Army, did not appear. When his name was
called, his masked wife, Lady Anne Fairfax, shouted out, “He has more wit
than to be here,” and was whisked out of the public gallery before she
could be arrested. After the court had been sworn in Charles demanded to
know by what authority he had been brought to trial. President of the
court John Bradshaw replied ‘In the name of Parliament assembled and all
the good people of England’. Lady Fairfax who had quietly returned sprang
up again ‘It is a lie! Not a half – nay, not a quarter of the people of
England’ and she was once more spirited away.
- 30 January 1649 – Outside the old Palace of Whitehall Charles I is
executed. Immediately afterwards, to the consternation of the regicides,
his memoir ‘Eikon Basiliske’ (Portrait of the King, his sacred majesty’s
solitude and sufferings) is published. Sold amongst the silent crowds,
and after more than twenty editions, it went on to become one of
England’s all time bestsellers. England is now a military dictatorship
run by Cromwell and his Council Of State’ appointees.
- 1649-1660 – Elected by The Rump Parliament after the House of Lords
has been abolished the Council of State assumes virtually sole executive
powers during the interregnum.
- Wednesday 28th March 1649 – Early morning arrest of
Leveller pamphleteers John Lilburn, William Walwyn, Overton and Thomas
Prince – Cromwell launches ‘project fear’ on the Council Of State ‘…if
you do not break them they will break you, yea, and bring all the guilt
of the blood and treasure shed and spent in this kingdom upon your heads
and shoulders…’ – proposes all four prisoners are committed to the tower
and wins by one vote.
- 1 and 18 April – two separate 10,000 signature Petitions for
Levellers’ release
- 23 April 1649 – Women’s 10,000 signature petition to Parliament
served, demanding release of the four Leveller captives and an end to
arbitrary rule which is bringing famine to the land
-
- 1 May 1649- The Agreement of the People published – Leveller
manifesto
- May 1649 – Wages unpaid and refusing to fight in Ireland, hundreds of
parliamentary Leveller soldiers sack their officers at Burford,
Oxfordshire. Cromwell arrests them in a midnight raid and next day three
soldiers are executed for mutiny. Commemorated in Burford at the annual
‘Levellers Day’ with music, speeches, and a march from the parish church
where soldiers and their horses were imprisoned.
- 1650-1720 – the ‘golden age’ of piracy. The British secret state’s
sponsorship of pirates is denied, just as Elizabeth denied she’d
supported privateers Drake, Raleigh etc. The Royal Navy ‘state within a
state’ works hard to fulfil John Dee’s vision for Britain’s dominance of
the high seas as the empire is established
- 3 September 1651- Battle of Worcester – final battle of the English
Civil war with Charles II leading a Scottish army. Parliamentarian
soldiers outnumber Royalists roughly 2:1 – Royalist casualties of c.
3,000 are roughly five times that of the Parliamentary army and 10,000
royalist soldiers are captured – a resounding defeat for Charles II
- 3 September – Wednesday 15 October 1651 – Charles II goes ‘on the
run’ for 43 days after losing the battle of Worcester and travelling as a
fugitive, disguised as an ostler. After Captain Limbry’s abortive attempt
to smuggle him to France from Charmouth in Dorset Charles eventually
makes it across the channel from Shoreham, Sussex in Captain Tattersall’s
coal freighter ‘The Surprise’.
- 4th July to 12 December 1653 – ‘Barebones Parliament’ of 140 Cromwell
appointees replaces the Rump Parliament who are ejected by Cromwell’s
soldiers.
- 16th December 1653 – 25 May 1659 – ‘The Protectorate’. After
Barebones is dissolved the ‘Instrument of Government’ creates the office
of Lord Protector for Cromwell who chairs the Council Of State now as
sole military rulers.
- March 1655 – Uprising in Wiltshire against Cromwell’s military rule
led by Colonel John Penruddock who led his followers into Salisbury and
declared Charles II king. The rebellion was crushed, its leaders executed
and English military rule suppressing all gatherings and pastimes was
formalised into 11 districts each run by a major-general for the next two
years.
- December 14, 1655 – After much lobbying by founder of Holland’s first
Hebrew printing press Menasseh Ben Israel, Jews are allowed back into
England for the first time since they were expelled in 1290.
- 25 may 1657 – Humble Petition and Advice offers Cromwell the title of
King which he rejects.
- 3 September 1658 – Cromwell dies aged 59.
- 14 April – 29 December 1660 – Convention Parliament elected.
- 1660 – Restoration of Charles II to the English throne after his
exile in France and the death of Oliver Cromwell – known as a time of
great literary and cultural freedom: comedies by Dryden, Wycherley,
Ertheridge, Sedley, Buckhurst etc, after previous grim decade of puritan
rule.
- June-July 1685 – Exiled after the 1683 Rye House Plot, James Scott,
1st Duke of Monmouth launched the Protestant Monmouth Rebellion on 11th
June 1685 landing with at Lyme Regis in a failed attempt to depose James
II. On 6th July Battle of Sedgemoor near Bridgwater, Somerset, finishes
off this rather insufficient attempt by Protestants to cut off the
Catholic Stuart line.
- 5th November 1688 – William of Orange lands at Torbay with 14,000
soldiers and 5,000 horses. Coup d’état or ‘Glorious Revolution’ follows
as James II is forced into exile in Ireland, while Protestant, William
III, ‘King Billy’ takes the English throne. This also begins the Catholic
‘Jacobite’ movement committed to restoring the Stuart line. Jacobite
areas tend to be Scotland, Northern England and the South-West, the old
royalist regions of the English Civil War.
- 1707 – Great Britain comes into being after the passage of the Treaty
of Union with Scotland.
- 27 August 1715 – Jacobite rising by the ‘Old Pretender’ James
Edward Stuart, son of deposed King James II, to regain the crown of
England, Scotland and Ireland. On 14th November his army surrendered at
Preston and the rebellion was over.
- 1737 – Andrew Ramsay reveals the 33 degrees of Scottish Rite
Freemasonry, so named because no decree had ever been issued by Scottish
Monarchs banning the Knights Templar.
- 1745 – Bonnie Prince Charlie leads abortive Jacobite rebel march on
London
- 1951 – The Fraudulent Mediums Act makes witchcraft legal in Britain
for the first time since 1542.
Conclusion
In his 1826 novel ‘Woodstock’ Sir Walter
Scott recounts, ‘the bankrupt brewer of Huntingdon’, and other
contemporary cavalier quips about Oliver Cromwell’s obscure pre-war life.
The aggressive, failed manager mysteriously given a new role as an
MP.
It should be clear by now that Charles was not simply dealing with an
organised faction of merchants who wished to see the nation run more
efficiently. No, behind these various plots was a conscious choice to
sidestep Christianity, the moral code that had been keeping them in their
place. As the joyless, pecuniary policies of the pseudo-Christian
Puritans also implies. In taking on parliament and the City of London was
Charles confronting John Dee’s well-organised criminal conspiracy? Dark
forces at play with nothing less than the world as their prize?
Is it this stepping into the spiritual that makes so many historians
baulk at addressing the wickedness of overthrowing the monarchy in the
seventeenth century, to replace it with a system of glorious rule by
Cromwell’s council of state? Where a secret cabal gets to hire and fire
those on the panel and there is limited free speech. In 1649 Burford even
parliamentary soldiers thought Cromwell might be worse than the
king.
However wicked a king might be, and Henry VIII was one of the most
despotic rulers since Herod, every once in a while the feudal system
throws up a good sort. It did with Charles and there was nothing the
oligarchy, organised crime, could do to unseat him except character
assassination followed by kangaroo court and execution.
Reading list – in order of personal preference
Old
Rowley, The Private Life Of Charles II by Dennis Wheatley (1933) –
affectionate roller coaster ride through young Charles survival and
resurgence after the war including easy to follow up detail on the
cultural thrill of the restoration
The Levellers And The English Revolution by Henry H. Brailsford
(1961) – takes us through the formation and attempted destruction of
Cromwell’s key Leveller opponents, along with their offshoots. Though
Brailsford is an internationalist he shows deep understanding for the
spiritual and moral factions on both sides of the war
Edmund Ludlow And The English Civil War edited by Jane Shuter
(1994) – fascinating account of a Parliamentary commander who finds
himself slowly losing faith in the cause for which he has been
fighting
Born In Blood, The Lost Secrets of Freemasonry by John J. Robinson
(1989) – Extraordinary historical exploration of the previously hidden
origins of eighteenth century Freemasonry in ancient and medieval secret
societies.
The World Turned Upside Down by Christopher Hill (1972) – Detailed
analysis of seventeenth century counter-culture centred around the
protestant reformation and agricultural reforms being imposed on England
and the cataclysmic Civil War which followed.
The Witch-Cult in Western Europe by Margaret Murray (1921) – A
study of the underground persistence of secret Canaanite and Phoenician
religious cults under the surface of gentile modern European
society.
Who we are
The Land Is
Ours was set up in 1995 by writer George Monbiot with the aim to echo
in the UK land rights campaigns across the developing world, notably
Brazil’s landless movement (MST). Also to take up the cause through
non-violent direct action of forgotten Diggers, Chartists and Land
Leaguers on our own islands. You can find us online at
http://www.tlio.org.uk and
join the Diggers list, set up in Easter 1999 when we occupied St George’s
Hill, Surrey for two weeks on the Diggers’ 350th anniversary, by
sending a blank email to diggers350...@gn.apc.org
Land is a free gift to mankind so should never be considered private
property like other things. ‘True Leveller’ Gerrard Winstanley said ‘The
Earth is a Common Treasury for All, Without Respect of Persons’.
Winstanley died a Quaker and the Bible puts it thus: The land is not
to be sold permanently, for the Earth is mine, sayeth The Lord God, and
you are but my tenants. Leviticus 25:25.
linked article
Tony’s
new paperback and eBooks
Traitors Of
Arnhem,
Siege
Of Heaven;
Siege Of
Heaven Reader – all available for donation, or to buy, via
www.bilderberg.org
BCfm’s weekly Politics Show presented by Tony Gosling with Irish
Republican Labour activist Martin Summers was forced off FM, now online
only. We were ‘rested due to the pandemic’ on 24 March 2020 by BCfm
charity ‘CEO’ Patrick Hart who is a longtime personal friend of Bristol’s
all-powerful right-wing ‘Labour’ mayor Marvin Rees.
This Internet only NOT The BCfm Politics Show is now available
17:00-c. 21:00 live on Fridays. Pat Hart replaced us with an inane
student show repeating MSM stories called
The Bristol Agenda. If
you’d like to share your views on his deliberate dumbing-down
mismanagement you can contact
UK broadcasting
regulator Ofcom or
BCfm board
chair and the ‘Don’
here.
February 2019 Ofcom complaint result:
UKLFI exposed as creation of Israeli foreign ministry –
Bristol Post article: BCfm cleared after being reported to Ofcom for
anti-semitic conspiracy theories