__._.___11 Conspiracy Theory–Insane or Insightful?
By Greg Hunter
April 10, 2012
I keep coming back to one question in the 9/11 conspiracy story: How did two jets knock down three New York City skyscrapers? The jets only hit two buildings, and that is a fact. I have posted a video from the group “RememberBuilding7.org” on the USAWatchdog.com site. (Click here to see Building 7 implode.) It clearly shows Building 7 of the World Trade Center imploding straight down, as if it was a controlled demolition. I am not an expert, but it sure looks like that to me. I, also, ran across this video from Corbettreport.com that summarizes the entire 9/11 conspiracy in less than 5 minutes. It was done on the 9/11 ten year anniversary. I found it very well done and factually spot on, although it goes by fast, so you must watch closely. Give it a look for yourself. Do you think the 9/11 conspiracy theory is insane or insightful?—Greg Hunter.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuC_4mGTs98 (Over 1,286,000 Views)
· hhhardfacts's blog
· Login to post comments
»
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=yuC_4mGTs98
Transcript and sources: http://www.corbettreport.com/?p=2594
Everything you ever wanted to know about the 9/11 conspiracy theory in under 5 minutes.
· Login to post comments
· 9 votes
Thank you, Greg Hunter! Now if only the rest of the talking heads in the cowardly corporate media could show the same degree of spine, we might make some headway in solving this once and for all.
It is the treasonous, yellow-livered mainstream media which is essentially obstructing the course of justice by denying Americans the facts, and simultaneously maintaining the wall which allows the planners and perpetrators of the attacks to remain free, to strike again at a time of their choosing.
Submitted by bloggulator on Wed, 04/11/2012 - 12:58pm.
»
· Login to post comments
· 2 votes
Except that in 'denying Americans the facts, and simultaneously maintaining the wall which allows the planners and perpetrators of the attacks to remain free, to strike again at a time of their choosing,' the mainstream media are simply fulfilling their role as the propaganda arm of the ruling elites. It isn't that they're yellow-livered; it's simply the nature of the beast. Let there be no misunderstanding of this basic point. It isn't simply that they are dependent on corporate interests; they ARE the corporate interests.
It's the so-called 'alternative' media, with all their posturing and pretense about being 'free' and 'open' and 'independent' and 'courageous' and unafraid to 'tell it like it is' who have been guilty of appalling gutlessness where 9/11 is concerned (not to mention other cases of terrorism, e.g., anthrax, the London bombings, etc., where they've done little to expose discrepancies in the official accounts).
Submitted by rm on Mon, 04/23/2012 - 10:38pm.
»
· Login to post comments
· 11 votes
when another person with intelligence AND conscience speaks out. The comments on the site are overwhelmingly in our favor.
Thank you Greg Hunter!
Who is next?
Submitted by Joe on Wed, 04/11/2012 - 2:24pm.
»
· Login to post comments
· 8 votes
I can't say for sure, but I don't think Mr. Hunter gets a 150+ comments on a month's worth of stories, not from what I've seen. Mostly all are pro truth. The comments that support the OCT are quite indicative of how desperate they must be. It is amazing what they'll come up with to ease their own minds. A Mr. Orling for example provides a very detailed description of exactly how WTC 7 collapsed including the 100 ft of freefall. His, as well as other "defender", explanation still includes burning diesel fuel, building damage, and other factors which were refuted by or never appeared in the final report Honestly, I think they just make this stuff up. It's kind of funny in a way, often it is we who get accused of not facing "facts" that don't support our point of view. Here, defenders (for lack of better term) have a report to support their position, as poor as it is, yet they still make up their own with just as little evidence as the first. I suppose this exposes their own lack of confidence in the NIST report. The response to these are commendable. No tearing down, no condescending remarks, or insults. Just simple refutation with facts. Good job to all.
Next we'll have to wait and see if Mr. Hunter takes his curiosity and investigates further. We'll know how sincere he is at getting all the facts.
peace everyone.
dtg
Submitted by dtg86 on Sat, 04/14/2012 - 10:29am.
»
· Login to post comments
· 5 votes
Thanks dtg!
Submitted by AConfederacyofDunces on Sun, 04/15/2012 - 9:49am.
»
· Login to post comments
· 8 votes
The importance and impact of this article and the seriousness and credibility of its author can not be ignored. Bravo, Greg, for your courage in asking these difficult questions. Thank you.
Submitted by AConfederacyofDunces on Wed, 04/11/2012 - 6:37pm.
»
· Login to post comments
· 12 votes
I bet many journalists and reporters have a sneaking suspicion regarding 9/11. Those in the media feign outrage over the idea of 9/11 conspiracy mongering while at the same time they are afraid to look into it much believing it could be true.
Submitted by tanabear on Wed, 04/11/2012 - 9:08pm.
»
· Login to post comments
· 6 votes
They are afraid to look at what really happened on that day. Sure the truth hurts but the truth will set all of us free from this rotten Government we live under. It's just amazing that more people don't see it. Bunch of brain washed sheep in my opinion.
Submitted by James Ozwald on Sun, 04/15/2012 - 3:37pm.
»
· Login to post comments
· 5 votes
I posted this comment on Greg's site. Do you agree? If you do, please post a comment here--- and there. If not, please explain.
http://usawatchdog.com/is-the-911-conspiracy-theory-insane-or-insightful/
Come on, Greg!
Please do something more than post articles. Your connections at CNN could be an invaluable tool for connecting the dots so many of us have assembled.
Once a few of them begin to connect the rest will follow.
Can you verify the camera position and direction of the low-flier in the CNN video of evacuation at the WH on 9/11? A two minute phone call to/from the videographer would be enough. An opportunity to review CNN video archives would be an extraordinary benefit to 9/11 research.
*** exposing the hidden truth for further educational research only *** CAVEAT LECTOR *** In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. NOTE: Some links may require cut and paste into your Internet Browser. Please check for daily real news posts and support the truth! (sorry but don't have time to email all posts) at http://tinyurl.com/cvg6l2g or http://tinyurl.com/33c9yr ; You can also subscribe to the multiple daily emails by sending an email to total_truth_sci...@googlegroups.com ; free book download: http://tinyurl.com/2afxwx2 ;*** Revealing the hidden Truth For Educational & Further Research Purposes only. *** NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security Agency (NSA) may have read emails without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no recourse, nor protection.......... IF anyone other than the addressee of this e-mail is reading it, you are in violation of the 1st & 4th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. Patriot Act 5 & H.R. 1955 Disclaimer Notice: This post & all my past & future posts represent parody & satire & are all intended for intellectual entertainment only. To be removed from the truth news list, please reply with the subject line "REMOVE"
.
