Bear: Isn't music wonderful? And there are all kinds of to make you feel all kinds of things. Like for instance: (some notes float up) orchestral music allows your mind to feel all sorts of things. And then there's some music that just let you want to take it easy. (a blue crib appears; making him sleepy, split silence wakes him up) And then there's some music that just makes you want to dance and sing. (a guitar appears along with animated hands and this thing on top left)
Bear: (with an idea given) Hey, you know who I haven't seen yet today? My good friend Shadow. Maybe if we look real hard & sing our song, she'll might appear. (Shadow's theme song plays) (singing) Oh where oh where oh where is Shadow (exits the bedroom) Where oh where oh where is Shadow Where oh where oh where is Shadow (camera pans to left) Where can Shadow be (stops singing a split second) Shadow!
The transfer credit tab displays the UW course equivalencies for courses students have transferred from other colleges and universities. For advisers familiar with the Student Database screens, this tab displays an enhanced version of the SRF330 screen.
Advisers can use this page as they currently do the SRF330 screen; that is, all advisers are able to flag courses for general education requirements and department advisers are able to adjust the articulation of transfer courses in their department prefixes.
When you first arrive at the Transfer Credit page, you will see the Transfer Summary. It lists the schools from which this student has transfer credit. To the left of each school name are two columns: Transfer Transcript and Evaluated Courses. From those available, select the type of transcript you want to see, and it will appear at the bottom of the screen.
Some institution names may be followed by "*Evaluation in Progress." In these cases, the finalized Evaluated Courses report may not be available until Admissions has completed their evaluation. In some cases, courses that had previously been evaluated would be subject to change pending the in-progress evaluation. For example, if the 1st part of a course sequence has already been evaluated, and later the 2nd part transfers in, the reevaluation could result in a change in the final UW equivalency.
If a Transfer Transcript is available, a "select" button will appear in this column. If selected, it will display the transcript information from that institution in chronological order. This information is available only from Washington community colleges because those transcripts are received electronically.
The Transfer Transcript can be useful when you're working with a student whose transcript has arrived but has not yet been evaluated by Admissions. Although the transfer classes have not yet been added in other places in the Student Database and EARS, you can view the raw community college transcript here. In these cases, the Transfer Transcript button appears and the Evaluated Courses button does not appear.
For some students with Washington state community college credits a Transfer Transcript will not be available. This could be either because the student brought in a paper transcript or because the transcript was entered into the UW system manually.
If an Evaluated Courses report is available, a "select" button will appear in this column. If selected, it will display the transcript information from that institution in nearly alphabetical order (see "Reading the Evaluated Courses report" below).
When courses appear in alternating lavender and white it means that the transfer articulation computer program automatically determined the UW equivalencies for the transfer courses. Again, this will only happen for Washington state community colleges for which the transcripts were received electronically. The original community college course is displayed on the left-hand side and its UW equivalent is displayed on the right-hand side. Listings alternate lavender-white so it's easier to see which transfer course articulates to which UW equivalent. Also, the appropriate color extends for as many rows as it takes to represent the course. For example, PHYS 114 from Bellevue College comes in as PHYS 1XX(1), PHYS 114(4), and PHYS 117(1), so the white color extends for all three lines to show that these courses are all connected.
The important thing to note about the courses in yellow is that if there is a course on the left and the right in the same row, the course on the left is not equivalent to the course on the right. They are unrelated and just happen to be using the same line on the screen. This is an unintentional quirk of the way the articulation system evaluates Washington state community college courses, and we hope this will be corrected in future updates of EARS. Be assured it is only a display issue; the course on the right did indeed transfer in for credit and you can see it elsewhere (e.g., unofficial transcript, DARS, SDB's SRF330 screen) if you need to verify.
Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson (C) presides over the fifth hearing by the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the Capitol on Thursday. Doug Mills/POOL/AFP via Getty Images hide caption
BENNIE THOMPSON: The Select Committee to investigate the January 6th attack on the United States Capitol will be in order. Without objection, the chair is authorized to declare the committee in recess at any point. Pursuant to House Deposition Authority Regulation 10, the chair announces the committee's approval to release the deposition material presented during today's hearing.
Good afternoon. In our previous hearings, the Select Committee showed that then President Trump applied pressure at every level of government, from local election workers up to his own vice president, hoping public servants would give in to that pressure and help him steal an election he actually lost. Today we'll tell the story of how the pressure campaign also targeted the federal agency charged with enforcement of our laws, the Department of Justice.
We already covered part of Mr. Trump's effort. We heard from Attorney General Bill Barr tell the story in the committee about the baseless claims Mr. Trump wanted the Justice Department to investigate, and that Mr. Barr viewed those claims as nonsense. Today we'll hear from Jeffrey Rosen, the person Mr. Trump appointed to run the Justice Department after Attorney General Barr resigned.
We'll hear from other senior Justice Department officials also. Together, these public servants resisted Mr. Trump's effort to misuse the Justice Department as part of his plan to hold on to power, and we will show that Trump's demands that the department investigate baseless claims of election fraud continued into January 2021. But Donald Trump didn't just want the Justice Department to investigate.
He wanted the Justice Department to help legitimize his lies, to basically call the election corrupt, to appoint a special counsel to investigate alleged election fraud, to send a letter to six state legislatures urging them to consider altering the election results. And when these and other efforts failed, Donald Trump sought to replace Mr. Rosen, the acting attorney general, with a lawyer who he believed would inappropriately put the full weight of the Justice Department behind the effort to overturn the election.
Let's think about what that means. Wherever you live in the United States, there's probably a local government executive, a mayor, or a county commissioner. There's also an official responsible for enforcing the laws, a district attorney, or local prosecutor. Imagine if your mayor lost a reelection bid, but instead of conceding the race, they picked up the phone, called the district attorney, and said I want you to say this election was stolen.
I want you to tell the Board of Elections not to certify the results. That's essentially what Donald Trump was trying to do with the election for president of the United States. It was a brazen attempt to use the Justice Department to advance the president's personal political agenda. Today my colleague from Illinois, Mr. Kinzinger, and other witnesses will walk through the Select Committees findings on these matters.
LIZ CHENEY: Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. At this point, our committee has just begun to show America the evidence that we have gathered. There is much more to come, both in our hearings and in our report, but I'd like to take just a moment to put everything we've seen in context. We have already seen how President Trump falsely declared victory on November 3rd, 2020, how he and his team launched a fraudulent media campaign that persuaded tens of millions of Americans that the election was stolen from him.
Donald Trump intentionally ran false ads on television and social media featuring allegations that his advisers and his Justice Department repeatedly told him were untrue. We have also seen how Donald Trump launched a fraudulent fundraising campaign that raised hundreds of millions of dollars, again based on those same false election fraud allegations.
We have seen how President Trump and his allies corruptly attempted to pressure Vice President Pence to refuse to count lawful electoral votes and obstruct Congress's proceedings on January 6th, and how he provoked a violent mob to pursue the vice president and others in our Capitol. We've seen how the president oversaw and personally participated in an effort in multiple states to vilify, threaten, and pressure election officials, and to use false allegations to pressure state legislators to change the outcome of the election.
We've seen how President Trump worked with and directed the Republican National Committee and others to organize an effort to create fake electoral slates and later to transmit those materially false documents to federal officials, again as part of his planning for January 6th. We have seen how President Trump persuaded tens of thousands of his supporters to travel to Washington DC for January 6th. And we will see in far more detail how the president's rally and march to the Capitol were organized and choreographed.
7fc3f7cf58