Algae control in stormwater facilities is difficult because of the nutrient loading. We experimented with barley bags in a constructed wetland this summer and will continue to look at this practice for inhibiting algae growth in retention ponds and constructed wetland ponds. Micropools are different because they are going to have such concentrated levels of nutrients. I don’t see it as a design issue - the micropool is intended to trap nutrients. Have they always had algae here or is it just time to muck out the micropool? The best way to get rid of it is mechanically harvesting it although given the right setting, algae can come back in a matter of weeks. If it’s been four or more years since the micropool was mucked out, it’s lost a good portion of its depth. I would recommend mucking it out.
Good luck.
Holly Piza, PE, CFM
Project Engineer
Master Planning Program
Urban Drainage and Flood Control District
West 26th Avenue, Suite 156-B
Denver, CO 80211
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4618 (20091118) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
Use of barley bales/bags have been shown to help with algae blooms (original findings came from Europe) apparently due to natural algaecide in barley cuttings; however, limited data also show that is done at the sacrifice in the reductions in nutrients. This makes sense since the nutrients being taken up by algae are no longer seeing this demand. More research is needed on this phenomenon. In the meantime, if nutrient control is not of the main concern, this is an apparently good way to reduce algae blooms in ponds and constructed wetlands. As to micro-pools, Holly makes very good points and I have nothing to add to her comments.
I would also like to point out, which should be obvious in the responses, that algae in a detention pond is an indication that they are working.