Dear UDAP.org Team,
This assumption doesn't hold particularly well for startups or organizations that are using hosted or containerized environments, and may just be setting up their environments.
Could you provide an issue ticket and tracking number? I will want to refer to this thread in workgroup meetings to discuss actionable next-steps on how we can get this implemented.
Lastly, for what it's worth, my base of comparison is
Touchstone and
Inferno, which provide similar automated testing functionality, and *do* provide detailed diagnostics information including query URL, sent payload, and received response. Since the majority of API test runners in the FHIR ecosystem do provide this level of fine-grained diagnostic information, one might go so far to say that it's the industry standard and expectation for detailed diagnostics information to be provided in the user interface.
I will be looking forward to discussing this topic in future workgroup meetings, and will be prioritizing it for follow up.
Thank you,
Abigail
Abigail
Watson
Principal FHIR Software Engineer
Open Health Services, MITRE
Co-Chair, HL7 Patient Empowerment Workgroup
awa...@mitre.org