Tell Me Why I 39;m Waiting Mp3 [UPDATED] Download
Argelia Fernandez
Try signalling end of input:Without superuser privileges it is hard to know what is going on underneath the hood. What can be done is to press Ctrl+d. Terminals and utilities in canonical mode send all available text to read() syscall upon receiving EOT signal bound to this key combination, and if there's no input - read() returns negative exit status which most utilities accept as signal to exit. Therefore, if a utility is waiting for input it will exit upon receiving the key combination. Otherwise, the utility is either running tasks or is not written properly.
Spying on syscalls:If you do have superuser privilege, you can run strace in another terminal to see what is currently being done. For that you need to find out PID of the program. For instance, in another terminal tab run pgrep -f firefox which may 1234 as example and then sudo strace -f -p 1234. If the output you see is stuck on read() syscall, it means the command probably is waiting for input. Otherwise, if you see syscalls running by, then command is doing something else. See a related question for usage of strace to also figure out if the long running command has exited.
Why not simply look at the column S (State) of the top command. If your program is waiting for input, there is a great chance it is sleeping and not running meaning top will output a S (for Sleeping this time) and not a R (for Running). Try this command as an example:
Is there anyway to avoid having the moronic ships landing at my stations to sit there like idiots waiting for me to tell each one of them to get on with their damn jobs just because I happen to be in the station? It's really, really, really annoying. Please tell me there's a checkbox somewhere that ends this idiocy.
I keep getting a message that TT is waiting on guidance about the new rules signed into law in March and that I should wait to file. That hopefully all will be fixed by the end of April. At the same time, TT blogs say everything is up to date and ready. I get emails telling me to "file now!", but they do not address the updates. When I go in and try to file again, I get the same message telling me to wait. What should I do? (We had about $3K in unemployment last year and an ACA with APTC, so not sure if one or both of these is holding us up or if this is an old message that someone has neglected to remove from the software)
Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of 2009-10 attendances at an ED contributing to the Australian non-admitted patient ED care database. The main outcome measure was difference in waiting time across triage categories.
Results: There were more than 5.8 million ED attendances. Raw ED waiting times varied by a range of factors including jurisdiction, triage category, geographic location and hospital peer group. All variables were significant in a model designed to test the effect of jurisdiction on ED waiting times, including triage category, hospital peer group, patient socioeconomic status and patient remoteness. When the interaction between triage category and jurisdiction entered the model, it was found to have a significant effect on ED waiting times (P
Conclusions: Although the Council of Australian Governments has adopted raw measures for its key ED performance indicators, raw waiting time statistics are misleading. There are no consistent differences in ED waiting times between states and territories after other factors are accounted for. WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT THE TOPIC? The length of time patients wait to be treated after presenting at an ED is routinely used to measure ED performance. In national health agreements with the federal government, each state and territory in Australia is expected to meet waiting time performance targets for the five ED triage categories. The raw data indicate differences in performance between states and territories. WHAT DOES THIS PAPER ADD? Measuring ED performance using raw data gives misleading results. There are no consistent differences in ED waiting times between the states and territories after other factors are taken into account. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTITIONERS? Judgements regarding differences in performance across states and territories for triage waiting times need to take into account the mix of patients and the mix of hospitals.
Hi Paul, thanks for explaining this as you have, its great to be able to get some background on this sort of topic. I have tried the script on some of my servers here and have at the top of my list on one of them a Wait Type of DBMIRROR_DBM_EVENT which is explained in BOL as "Identified for informational purposes only. Not supported. Future compatibility is not guaranteed.". 4th in order on the same server is DBMIRROR_WORKER_QUEUE
with BOL saying "Indicates that the database mirroring worker task is waiting for more work." from that explanation I think I should be adding that to the excluded list but what should I do about the DBMIRROR_DBM_EVENT waits, is there any cause for concern or should I exclude that from the results too?
Finally, if you have partitioned tables, another help is to make sure you set the lock escalation on those partitioned tables to AUTO (believe it or not AUTO is not the default). A large table locked for scan can invoke a parallel scan against the clustered index unneccesarily, especially if a partition scan is only required. By setting to AUTO, you allow the optimizer to make intelligent decisions about parallelism. In our environment, I actually create filtered stats down to each partition by the partition key (since most of my tables are read once the data is inserted). This really helps with performance as well.
That of course, also improves the performance of this query too. Because in Big O terms, yours is N^2 while my version is N LogN. You can't really tell here because the N is so small but on large numbers the JOIN on an indexed field is super fast compared to IN.
We have a table where parallel data load happens. 30 concurrent sessions inserting into this table. We do have a short but randomized clustered key on this table so there is no insert hot spot problem. However the from time to time some the concurrent inserts are stuck for ever. While checking what is running/waiting, reveals all these threads are suspended with wait_type = . You have filtered out this wait type as this not usually a problem, but in our case the parallel inserts are stuck due to this wait type. Can you advise what can we do here? Many Thanks.
We have a table where parallel data load happens. 30 concurrent sessions inserting into this table. We do have a short but randomized clustered key on this table so there is no insert hot spot problem. However the from time to time some the concurrent inserts are stuck for ever. While checking what is running/waiting, reveals all these threads are suspended with wait_type = SLEEP_TASK. You have filtered out SLEEP_TASK wait_type as this not usually a problem, but in our case the parallel inserts are stuck due to this wait type. Can you advise what can we do here? Many Thanks
Practice saying the word "love" to him. Start with "I love spending time with you" or "I love your new pants." Then it might feel less intimidating when you say "I love you." It's quite possible that he's also nervous and waiting for you to go first.
Oh, and the way you tell this fella that you love him doesn't have to be fancy. You can do it at the grocery store, or driving in the car, or watching TV. You don't have to make some grand speech. It's just a few words, but they pack a punch no matter where or how you say them.
My research group is transitioning from using conda + jupyter + irkernel for data analysis with R to Rstudio Server. I've noticed that many of my colleagues now spend a lot of time waiting for knitr to finish. It seems that waiting for knitr is the default (naive) mode that a new Rstudio user falls into. There are tricks for speeding up knitr runs (eg., cache & using multiple sessions if using server pro), but why is the default for Rstudio "click knitr and wait"? Such an approach is not taken with continuous integration for instance; a developer doesn't sit and wait for all CI tests to complete before moving on. The developer starts working on the next task right away while the CI tests run in the background/remotely. Why isn't the default for knitr to run the knitting process in the background? Even with background knitting, there's still the issue of long running code that takes hours or days to complete. If a user just changes a small section of their rmd file, they have to re-knit and either wait hours/days or use cache=TRUE for code chunks, which seems to have its own issues (below).
There are waiting time targets for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer in the different UK nations. The aim for all healthcare systems within the UK is to make sure that you have a diagnosis and start treatment as soon as possible.
Getting a diagnosis of cancer can sometimes take a while. Sometimes it might feel that you are waiting too long. Usually everyone will have to wait for appointments, tests and results. Only then can you start treatment. This can be frustrating and difficult to cope with.
You may begin to worry that the cancer will spread during this time. But we know that most cancers usually grow slowly. So waiting a few weeks for a test or treatment does not usually affect how well the treatment works.
Your GP, dentist, optometrist (eye doctor) or nurse will arrange your referral to see a hospital doctor (specialist), or to have tests. They should tell you if this is an urgent suspected cancer referral. An urgent referral can be worrying. But remember that more than 9 in every 10 people (more than 90%) referred this way will not have a diagnosis of cancer.
NHS England has a waiting time target for cancer that has come back (a recurrence). They say that you should start treatment within 31 days. This time starts from the meeting in which you and your doctor have agreed your treatment plan.
df19127ead