You can say "I am a TLDA Member", but you have no right to speak for the
TLDA or to claim that the TLDA has position X or Y unless they have published
such a position.
As for the so-called "Scam", we have nothing but Joe's claim that there has
been a scam. Again, the TLDA is not a court of law or other regulatory body
and it should not take sides in disputes.
WHEN and IF we get re-organized, the TapRoot and Compliance committees
will be responsible for collecting a list of all known TLDs and determining
which versions of colliding TLDs have the most legitimate claim by applying
our criteria.
At this time, the organization is still in the re-org phase and we are not in
a position to operate our Taproot. There are no Taproot committee members
nor are there any Compliance committee members.
I consider the matter closed. You can of course, continue to beat a dead
horse, and I'm sure that is exactly what Joe wants, but I'm done with such a
discussion.
John
Quoted from Mr. John Palmer :
"the TLDA has not given Joe Baptista the right to use the TLDA name,"
Joe didn't use the name, outside of the above names. This was never a question. Say why is it being brought up?
Do the members have rights to use the TLDA name? As I am a member do I have right to use the TLDA name?