bush is ignorant about the reason for his veto
beta
"Scientists have reacted with anger to US President George W Bush's
decision to veto a bill allowing federal funding for new embryonic stem
cell research.
They argue it will damage a promising field of medical research.
Leading researchers labelled Mr Bush "hypocritical", "out of touch" and
"selfish" over his decision not to sign into law a bill approved by
Congress.
Mr Bush argued that the law "crossed a moral boundary that our decent
society needs to respect".
Polls suggest most Americans back the research, which scientists hope
will lead to cures for serious illnesses such as Alzheimer's,
Parkinson's and diabetes.
(((What's this about "our decent society" again, Dubya? Seems THEY have
no problem with the concept, unlike you!)))
The vetoed bill, the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act, would have
scrapped limits on federal funding imposed by Mr Bush in 2001. It was
the first time in his presidency that Mr Bush refused to sign into law
a bill approved by Congress.
The bill failed to reach the two-thirds majority in its Senate vote
which would have overturned the presidential veto.
In Britain, the President's decision drew anger and derision from the
research community.
It re-emphasised "how out of touch he is with rational thinking on this
issue," said Robin Lovell-Badge, head of developmental genetics at the
National Institute for Medical Research.
The blocking of federal funds for research on embryonic stem cells is
"slowing down the global effort to develop therapies for a range of
diseases and illnesses," added Martin Rees, president of the Royal
Society.
Mr Bush summed up his opposition to the bill on ethical grounds. "This
bill would support the taking of innocent human life of the hope of
finding medical benefits for others," he said. Rolling Eyes
But Graeme Laurie, an expert in the legal side of medicine from
Edinburgh University, said there was an "underlying hypocrisy" in Mr
Bush's position.
"The stated reason for President Bush's objection to embryonic stem
cell research is that 'murder is wrong'; why then does he not intervene
to regulate or ban [embryonic] stem cell research carried out with
private funds and which is happening across the US?" he asked.
"It is a strange morality indeed that pins the moral status and life of
the embryo on the question of who is paying for the research."
(((Not to mention that the whole "culture of life" twaddle is at odds
with all the WARS he's mongering)))
The 2001 federal funding regulation provides government money only for
lines of stem cells that already existed when the order came into
effect, not for any new lines.
But US researchers say that sticking to these lines restricts progress.
Jeffrey Balser, associate vice-chancellor for research at Vanderbilt
University in Nashville, said US institutions were "on the threshold of
phenomenal progress in stem cell research.
"But we are being slowed by these federal restrictions," he told The
Tennessean website and newspaper.
The Senate vote came at the end of two days of emotional debates on
three separate stem cell bills.
Two other less controversial bills received unanimous backing from the
Senate, and were signed into law by President Bush.
One encourages stem cell research using cells from sources other than
embryos, and the other bill bans the growing and aborting of foetuses
for research.
The stem cell debate now seems set to be an issue in November's
mid-term congressional elections.