New_Core_Curriculum

4 views
Skip to first unread message

Gordon Hilley

unread,
Oct 30, 2012, 11:19:18 AM10/30/12
to txch...@googlegroups.com

Fellow Chairs,

 

Just wanted to know if there are any other Kinesiology Departments fighting to stay in the core curriculum as a Component Area Option after the Co Board changes that are to be implemented in 2013.  Presently, at Del Mar, our core curriculum requires 2 one-hour physical activity classes for Associate of Arts degrees.  If you are currently engaged in staying in the core, please let me know how your department is approaching it.  Hopefully, we can share some ideas.

 

Thank you.

 

Gordon M. Hilley, Ed.D.

Chair, Kinesiology Department

Del Mar College

East Campus

101 Baldwin Blvd.

Corpus Christi, TX    78404

Office phone:  (361)698-1151

fax: (361)698-1936

 



Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this email, including attachments, may be
privileged, proprietary, and/or confidential as provided by law. The information in this email is intended
only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify the sender by replying to the email message and immediately
return the email, attachments, and any and all copies to the sender. If you are not the intended recipient
of this email and received it in error, please be advised that you may be subject to civil liability for any
use of privileged, proprietary, and/or confidential information contained herein.

Knudson, Duane V

unread,
Oct 30, 2012, 11:22:51 AM10/30/12
to txch...@googlegroups.com

Colleagues.  We have a department committee drafting a three-credit fitness/wellness class with activity to be proposed as an option in the component area.  This class would be aligned with the behavioral sciences and the 21st century skills linked to that area by the politicians. What a mess.

 

Duane

Gordon Hilley

unread,
Oct 30, 2012, 11:26:18 AM10/30/12
to txch...@googlegroups.com

Duane,

 

Are you aligning that course with Life & Physical Sciences?

 

We are planning to propose each physical activity course to our Curriculum Committee.

 

You’re right, what a mess.

 

Gordon

Knudson, Duane V

unread,
Oct 30, 2012, 11:33:41 AM10/30/12
to txch...@googlegroups.com

No, but we think that the two main targets can be Physical and Life Sciences or Social and Behavioral Sciences. We like that the core objectives (21 century skills) attached to Life and Physical Sciences involved teamwork, critical thinking, communication, and quantitative problem solving. The pragmatics of our situation are that the Provost decided that only 3 unit classes would be allowed, so the sciences will likely not have as many labs.

 

Each department will need to see what area they can compete in best given the politics, finances, and facilities of that university.

Mel Finkenberg

unread,
Oct 30, 2012, 11:36:26 AM10/30/12
to txch...@googlegroups.com
We are about to initiate a committee with a similar charge. If anyone is willing (we will be, once we get started) to share the specifics of what you are doing with the list, that would be great.

It seems pretty clear that activity courses will not be considered here. However, a wellness and/or lifetime fitness class might be considered. I should note that at this time we are not included in the core.

Mel
--------------------
Mel E. Finkenberg
Regents Professor and Chair
Department of Kinesiology and Health Science
Stephen F. Austin State University
Nacogdoches, TX 75962-3015



On Oct 30, 2012, at 10:22 AM, "Knudson, Duane V" <dknu...@txstate.edu> wrote:

Colleagues.  We have a department committee drafting a three-credit fitness/wellness class with activity to be proposed as an option in the component area.  This class would be aligned with the behavioral sciences and the 21st century skills linked to that area by the politicians. What a mess.
 
Duane
 

Mel Finkenberg

unread,
Oct 30, 2012, 11:37:48 AM10/30/12
to txch...@googlegroups.com
While we don't have a stipulation that only 3-hour classes will be permitted, a number of our science courses are dropping their labs, resulting in 3-hour classes.

Mel
--------------------
Mel E. Finkenberg
Regents Professor and Chair
Department of Kinesiology and Health Science
Stephen F. Austin State University
Nacogdoches, TX 75962-3015



On Oct 30, 2012, at 10:33 AM, "Knudson, Duane V" <dknu...@txstate.edu> wrote:

No, but we think that the two main targets can be Physical and Life Sciences or Social and Behavioral Sciences. We like that the core objectives (21 century skills) attached to Life and Physical Sciences involved teamwork, critical thinking, communication, and quantitative problem solving. The pragmatics of our situation are that the Provost decided that only 3 unit classes would be allowed, so the sciences will likely not have as many labs.
 
Each department will need to see what area they can compete in best given the politics, finances, and facilities of that university.
 
Duane  
 

Christopher M. Hearon

unread,
Oct 30, 2012, 11:56:03 AM10/30/12
to txch...@googlegroups.com

We’re actually looking to get BACK into the core with these new requirements.

 

-We will be proposing Sport & Global Society (3 hr) to count in both Social/Behavioral, and in the Component Area Option (CAO).  This course is currently the only gen ed course we offer (Global Learning) and I expect it to stay in the core under both sections. Or at the very least in the CAO.

-From health we will also be proposing Fitness/Wellness (2 hr) and CPR/FA (1 hr) in the CAO section.  I think both of these will make it in.

-From adventure ed, we will be proposing all of our courses (1-3 hr) in the CAO section.  I think all of these will make it in as well.

-From aquatics, we will be proposing all of our courses (all 1 hr) in the CAO section.  I doubt these will make it in.

-And, we will be proposing all of the general activity courses (all 1 hr) in the CAO section.  I doubt these will make it in.

 

The reason I doubt the aquatics and general activities will make it in is because I have left it to the faculty who have expertise in these areas to complete the justifications to our gen ed curriculum committee. They of course have put in zero effort and I expect these courses to be denied. This is unfortunate because the gen ed committee desperately needs 1 hr courses in the COA section, because the 2 lab hours from the natural sciences will be allowed to come down and count for CAO. Leaving a lot of people needed a 1 hr course to complete their core.

 

Personally, I do not care if we are in the gen ed or not. I don’t have adequate faculty numbers to offer enough sections of my major courses.  I have an intro to exercise science course being taught with 150 freshman in the class.  Needless to say, there is not much engagement taking place in there.  I have the largest major on campus, I’m fine not being in the gen ed business.

 

-CMH

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Christopher M. Hearon, Ph.D., FACSM

Professor and Department Chair

Coordinator, Human Performance Laboratory

 

PorkySmallTexas A&M University-Kingsville

Department of Health & Kinesiology

 

 

 

 

USPS (Letters and Packages):

700 University Blvd. (MSC 198)

Kingsville, TX 78363-8202

 

Packages via Commercial Carriers (FedEx, UPS):

Steinke PE Center #100

910 W. Avenue B

Kingsville, TX 78363

 

361-593-3048

361-593-2141 (Fax)

Christoph...@tamuk.edu

 

Department of HKN Web Site:

http://www.tamuk.edu/cehp/hkn/

 

From: txch...@googlegroups.com [mailto:txch...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Gordon Hilley
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 10:19 AM
To: txch...@googlegroups.com
Subject: New_Core_Curriculum

 

Fellow Chairs,

image001.png
image003.png

Bonnette, Randy

unread,
Oct 30, 2012, 12:10:43 PM10/30/12
to txch...@googlegroups.com

I have done the same as Duane.  We currently don’t have anything in the core, but the state forced us to drop down from 45 to 42.  I’ve been on our university core committee for 10 years and have tried to get that done from day one.  This was good for many reasons, but it made this committee take a class that I don’t think belonged in the core and made it an ‘either or’ option in the behavioral sciences.  So, we have no set a precedent for having additional choices in this section IF it fits the criteria.  Bank on it, my syllabus and course fits so I am hopeful to actually get a class just like Duane suggests in the core.

 

rb

 

Randy Bonnette

Chair, Kinesiology and Military Science

Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi

(361)825-6072

 

From: txch...@googlegroups.com [mailto:txch...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Knudson, Duane V
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 10:23 AM
To: txch...@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: New_Core_Curriculum

 

Colleagues.  We have a department committee drafting a three-credit fitness/wellness class with activity to be proposed as an option in the component area.  This class would be aligned with the behavioral sciences and the 21st century skills linked to that area by the politicians. What a mess.

Almstedt, Richard H

unread,
Oct 30, 2012, 12:15:05 PM10/30/12
to txch...@googlegroups.com, Sebesta, Tim R, Camarata, Yolanda M

We are fighting to keep our one activity requirement in the core.  It has been a year-long process.  The Kinesiology Curriculum Committee has been working on the defense of the program for over a year.  They will present their arguments later this spring. They have put a tremendous amount of time and effort into the process.   I am copying two of the team members on your email.  They will be able to provide more insight into the outstanding work they have done in defense of our programs.

 

Richard H. Almstedt

Department Chair for Kinesiology & Dance

Lone Star College – Kingwood

281-312-1656

Description: LSC

 

From: txch...@googlegroups.com [mailto:txch...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Gordon Hilley
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 10:19 AM
To: txch...@googlegroups.com
Subject: New_Core_Curriculum

 

Fellow Chairs,

Steven R. Snowden

unread,
Oct 30, 2012, 12:19:45 PM10/30/12
to txch...@googlegroups.com, Doyle Carter

Well before I took over as chair,  Dr. Doyle Carter made an impassioned and articulate plea for keeping our courses as a part of the core to no avail.  Like Christopher, we can barely offer the courses needed for our own majors so that has made it a moot point anyway.

 

SS

 

cid:image001.gif@01C9CD63.2D528950

Steven R. Snowden

Associate Professor &  Chair, Department of Kinesiology
Angelo State University
Member, Texas Tech University System
ASU Station #10903

San Angelo, TX 76909-0903
Phone: (325) 942-2173   Fax: (325) 942-2129
mailto:ssno...@angelo.edu

 

From: txch...@googlegroups.com [mailto:txch...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Gordon Hilley
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 10:19 AM
To: txch...@googlegroups.com
Subject: New_Core_Curriculum

 

Fellow Chairs,

Patty Donaldson

unread,
Oct 30, 2012, 6:19:45 PM10/30/12
to txch...@googlegroups.com
I have asked to determine what other colleges/universities are doing with regard to this 'mess' as well. Currently, there are no PHED courses required in the core curriculum. There are some programs at AC that require 1 or 2 hours of physical activity with their program requirements. I had originally suggested that we add a 1-hr "Fundamentals of Fitness" course to the CAO (along with the science labs).
--
Patty Donaldson, MS, CAPE
PHED Coordinator/Instructor
Angelina College
3500 S. First
Lufkin, TX 75904
office: 936-633-5435
cell: 214-507-1872
 
TAHPERD

Do what you can... with what you have... where you are...
* Theodore Roosevelt *

Wittenburg, David K

unread,
Oct 30, 2012, 6:53:15 PM10/30/12
to txch...@googlegroups.com

We are in a similar situation as Chris. We currently do not have a course in the core. But there is some recent discussion at the college level of different programs with the College of Health Sciences proposing courses that could be offered within the core. We mentioned that we could probably offer a Fitness/Wellness type of course. This is still in the very early stages of discussion.

David

 

David Wittenburg, Ph.D.

Chair, Department of Kinesiology

Associate Professor

University of Texas at El Paso

500 W. University Avenue

El Paso, TX 79902

 

Phone: (915) 747-7208

 

cid:image002.png@01CD6598.ADB3F9A0

 

From: txch...@googlegroups.com [mailto:txch...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Christopher M. Hearon
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 9:56 AM
To: txch...@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: New_Core_Curriculum

 

We’re actually looking to get BACK into the core with these new requirements.

Cox, Graeme

unread,
Oct 30, 2012, 7:31:12 PM10/30/12
to txch...@googlegroups.com

Colleagues,

 

Good to see this informative discussion.  I have some hopefully good news for some of you.  Obviously our schools are handling this in completely different ways and to me it looks like getting your other Divisions on board may be helpful.  Currently we have 1 Kinesiology hour in the core and made the cut to 42 core hours a few years back so that’s one problem we’re avoiding.  My goal was to keep the Activity program alive because it gives the students an opportunity to try a lifelong type activity for 4 months, with professional instruction, much cheaper that they could get at their local fitness center.  Nothing wrong with the fitness/health theory classes but for most of our students it goes in one and out the other.   At least the activity classes gets them off their butts, or at least moving.

 

Dr. Rex Peebles ( rpee...@midland.edu ) spoke to us at Professional Devp. Day in August and explained the Component Area Option as having 2 parts.  3 hours followed one of the Foundational Component Areas just as all the other classes.  Up to 3 hours need to meet the Core Objectives of Critical Thinking, Communication and 1 other.  My Dean explained this as a way to allow institutions to include Study Skills type classes or Cultural Anthropology that overlapped the other areas without being totally within them.  That’s where we’re putting our Kinesiology hour.  If you refer to slide 26 from the attached Powerpoint that is clearly shown (This PowerPoint is from another presentation my Dean attended recently in Austin).

 

We are integrating our Institutional Option (6 hours) into the core as such: Communication is going to 9 hours (including Speech), Life and Physical Sciences is going to 8 (keeping our labs), which leaves 1 hour for our Kinesiology Activity classes under the aforementioned criteria.

 

I have been meeting with my faculty to determine which other Core Objective we will meet.  Initially we were going with Teamwork but how we are doing our assessment means we are going to take another look at Personal Responsibility.  We are using the LEAP rubrics across the campus to meet our curriculum mapping requirements.  Our goal is to develop assessments that can easily be carried out by our coaches and adjuncts.  I would be happy to share any of our assessment methods or criteria with those of you who may be interested.  This is still very much a work in progress and I am meeting with my faculty again in the morning.

 

I am attending the administrators breakfast at TAHPERD and look forward to sharing our experiences there.  This is a critical time for our programs and the health of our students.

 

Graeme Cox

Division Chair

Kinesiology, Athletics and Wellness

281-425-6223

www.lee.edu

Kinesiology Club: www.facebook.com/LeeCollegeKinesiologyClub

 

 

 

 

From: txch...@googlegroups.com [mailto:txch...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Gordon Hilley
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 10:19 AM
To: txch...@googlegroups.com
Subject: New_Core_Curriculum

 

Fellow Chairs,

CORE 14 Overview.pdf
thecb_goeman-heston.pptx

Smith, Darla

unread,
Nov 1, 2012, 2:39:17 PM11/1/12
to txch...@googlegroups.com
Hello everyone - if you have not already done so, I encourage you to purchase a ticket to the TAHPERD Administrator's Breakfast. Joe Bell has added this topic to the agenda and Duane Knudson will lead the discussion.
 
Best,
Darla
 

From: txch...@googlegroups.com [txch...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Wittenburg, David K [witt...@utep.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 4:53 PM
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages