Data from 2022 shows that iron and steel imports from Mexico increased by more than 70%, semi-finished steel by 120% and conduit imports by nearly 600%. Republicans, Democrats and the United Steelworkers Union say it is steel coming into the U.S. in violation of a 2019 trade agreement with Mexico.
United Steelworkers Union International President David McCall was in Cleveland Wednesday, meeting with Sen. Sherrod Brown and Cleveland Cliffs President and CEO Lourenco Goncalves to call on the Biden Administration to take action. Brown says the flow of steel from Mexico plays a role in job losses.
"Republic Steel unforunately announced plans to close it's Canton, Ohio and Lackawanna, New York plants last December; 500 workers are losing good paying union jobs," Brown said. "Since last year we've sounded the alarm on this, we've called on the administration on this but the unfair imports keep flooding into our country."
United in this call for action are McCall and Goncalves. The two are also united in the ongoing opposition to the planned sale of US Steel to Japanese-based Nippon. McCall said it violates their collective bargaining agreement and is a threat to national security that President Biden told the union in April he would block.
"The president's been on record as saying that he believes US Steel should remain an American owned company and operated by American workers; we completely agree with that," said McCall. "So, we're opposed to the deal first of all because it violates our collective bargaining agreement but just as many concerns around critical infrastructure and national defense that's being reviewed by the CIFIUS (Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S.) in D.C. now, we'll eventually put a report on the president's desk.
"We suspect that once that report gets put on his desk, he will reject it. We also have arbitration scheduled on our collective bargaining agreement in a couple of months, so the Board of Arbitration for US Steel will either reject the deal or CIFIUS will or they both will."
Beyond that, Goncalves, who started this whole process last year with an unsolicited bid for US Steel, tells News 5 that former President Trump called him and made the same pledge if he's elected to also block the deal.
"There are only two guys with a chance to be President of the United States and they are both against. That's a bad start for the deal," Goncalves said. "In my opinion there's total assurance that Nippon Steel is not going to own US Steel."
"Nippon and US Steel are out on a big PR campaign about how they're going to guarantee no layoffs and they'll back up the contract, and they'll be no plant shutdowns," McCall said. "All of us who have worked in the steel industry know that to say that is one thing but then the caveat they put in their proposed agreements is, unless there's a change in our business plan. So they're meaningless."
The traditional service level in the contact centre is to answer 80% of calls in 20 seconds. However, over recent times, many contact centres have made an effort to improve service levels by attempting to answer 90% of calls in 15 seconds.
In these findings, we can also see that there are some contact centres that are willing to let customers wait a little longer in the queue, to focus on giving them the best possible service once they reach an advisor.
Most contact centres would do more random scoring of calls, but they struggle to find the time for call analysts to do so. This often leads contact centres to ask the team to score the calls of one another.
The presence of certain language, and other key metrics, are combined into a scorecard that measures various performance indicators, such as: advisor quality, customer satisfaction, emotion and compliance risk.
By automating scorecards, the contact centre can provide accurate and objective feedback to advisors, so they can improve their own quality. Scorecards can also be used by supervisors to personalise training and coaching for advisors to improve quality further.
This makes it impossible to accurately benchmark FCR across the contact centre. Also, as soon as there is a slight difference in channel mix, the metric becomes even more difficult to compare because there is a completely new set of circumstances to think about.
It is all well and good to have a generic FCR score, but if a contact centre were to create an individual score for each of its top ten contact reasons, it would gain more actionable insight. This is because the contact centre can get more of an indication as to which call reasons advisors are struggling to handle and which are causing the most trouble for customers to come to terms with.
Once this becomes clear, the contact centre can focus on those call reasons by improving advisor process guides, improving website navigation and so on, in an bid to focus their efforts on where best to boost FCR rates.
Often, the contact centre will find that its advisors use different methods to elicit the same information from their customers. This is both in terms of call-handling techniques and system navigation.
By analysing these methods, the contact centre can put together cheat sheets that encourage advisors to use the method that has best impact on Customer Satisfaction (CSat) and proves the most efficient.
Focusing on the factors of customer service that are constantly repeated by detractors is a key priority. This is because they may not only be giving the brand a bad reputation, but having a detractor-led focus makes it easier to find areas of failure demand and unnecessary operational costs.
There may also be a chance that the organisation as a whole may be attracting the wrong type of customers, whose needs they may not be able to satisfy. Detractor feedback may be able to highlight this.
Customers who have already got through to the contact centre will find further delays more irritating and will be less likely to accept prolonged hold and queue times. This will damage satisfaction and consequently lower the chances of a customer reference.
However, the average figure that is entered into our Erlang Calculator is 26.6%, which might indicate that there is widespread confusion over the definition of shrinkage and/or how to calculate the metric.
In fact, when Knowhow, the delivery and installation service, applied this scheduling scheme in its contact centre, it lowered sickness by as much as 8%, as seen below. It also helped to lower attrition.
While it is generally understood that occupancy in the contact centre is best placed between 85 and 90%, to get the most out of the team and to protect them from burnout, most contact centres are not reaching this level.
To do this, these contact centres will likely use spreadsheets in tandem with an Erlang Calculator. However, there are many Erlang Calculators that do not account for occupancy, meaning that contact centre staff could be significantly over-utilised.
While some Erlang Calculators only account for service level, meaning that there are still enough advisors to answers the forecast number of calls, occupancy ensures that the team are not being overworked, as highlighted below. This can be a significant factor in maintaining morale.
Providing key metrics and clear numbers is primordial in any industry, and it becomes particularly challenging in the field of call centers. This is why managers have developed a number of techniques to quantify results and improve efficiency over the years. One of these methods is Call Center Service Levels.
In the context of call center performance metrics, this is often employed to measure the percentage of incoming calls that agents answer live during a set amount of time. However, with a number of different formulas and definitions, there remains a great deal of confusion on the topic.
Unfortunately, calculating call center service levels is a highly contentious issue. This is because the rate can easily be manipulated depending on the formula employed to calculate it. In the following examples, we will look at 5 different ways to calculate service levels and see how they offer different results.
Since different Center Service Levels offer varying results depending on the data selected, you need to ensure all your parameters are well defined. This can easily be done by following this 10-point checklist:
Some companies often experience spikes in their call center activities, following periods of calm. To cope with this change in pace, some companies use temporary workers, others subcontract all or part of their services while others opt for overstaffing. All these alternatives are unfortunately not conducive to the stabilization of service levels.
A final point to note is that if you are working with clients who require Call Center Service Levels, your formulas should be made transparent with everyone in order to be understood. This point is usually defined during a contract between the call center and the client, and as a reasonable solution, most of them will include a clause to accept 10% variance between the results.
The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has led to wide-ranging impacts on business turnover between and within "high-contact" industries - wholesale and retail; transportation and storage; accommodation and food services; arts, entertainment and recreation; and other services.
The wholesale and retail industry had the smallest fall in turnover following the national lockdowns, although "within" effects show that non-essential retail stores were more adversely affected, while outdoor stores performed relatively stronger.
The largest falls in turnover in the first half of 2020 in the accommodation and food services industry were for the beverage-serving sub-industry and the hotels and similar accommodation sub-industry, while there has been stronger performance for holiday and other short-stay accommodation, camping grounds, recreational vehicle parks, and other accommodation throughout the coronavirus pandemic.
In the arts, entertainment, and recreation industry, the largest falls in turnover were for amusement and recreational activities, gambling and betting activities, and creative arts and entertainment activities; however, the within-industry effects imply a change in preference towards outdoor activities over indoor activities.
d3342ee215