Eca Vrt Disk 2012 Dvd Iso Full.35
Libe Nipper
I have a VM that I use to host ownCloud and Subsonic services. Machine virtual disk is dynamic with an original limit of 10GB (I've since raised it to 15GB), as are all my VMs. I have attached 2 vdi's; 1 for OC (100GB) and another for Subsonic (200GB). Both are nowhere near capacity according to Debian:
I know it says host but under settings in phpVirtualBox, guest system vdi shows a virtual size of 10GB and an actual size of 9.43GB. I have other VMs with same vdi limitations whose actual size are in correlation with what is seen in the guest OS and at most 30% disk space used. I don't foresee this being an issue anymore as I have expanded the vdi to 15GB but am curious as to why the actual and virtual sizes were so close on this particular VM. There's nothing stored on the system drive and I never write any data to it since I've had the VM set up which is going on 9 months now.
Narrowed it down to the VDI I attach for ownCloud storage. If I remove both attached drives OS boots without issue minus complaints of missing disks. Once I add the 100GB VDI for owncloud the machine is suspended. I've attached it to another test VM and same thing happens when mounting manually or via fstab at boot.
Not sure how much time I want to spend on this. I do have a backup of the storage VDI I could try to restore but I get the feeling this could be a recurring issue for whatever reason. Might be time to move to OMV .5. I haven't looked into it too much but is there a VBox plugin that's closer to the current version with .5?
Ended up happening with either subsonic or owncloud storage drive mounted. Had an idea to convert VDI's to fixed and am able to boot with both drives mounted. VM no longer pauses. See how long that lasts.
You can protect the data on your laptop or computer by encrypting its drive with LUKS full disk encryption. This safeguards the disk contents even if your disk is physically removed from the system. To access the decrypted content on the device, you need to provide a passphrase or key file.
You will be returned to the INSTALLATION SUMMARY screen. Press the Begin Installation button to start the installation process. The installation process will start. Just sit back and relax.
Enter the LUKS2 passphrase that you previously specified. The last phase of the installation procedure will start. Click the Start Setup button to complete the remaining customization steps, such as setting a new login, password, and so on.
I will stick to the default iteration time of 2000 ms though, as I do not wish to compromise security. I have no problem waiting 30 seconds. For the passphrase, I will be using the same passphrase I used for LUKS2.
Now create an Ext4 filesystem on the mapped device with the same UUID that was originally used by the /boot partition. This avoids the need to change the /etc/fstab file or any other file that has the old UUID.
DO NOT use the previous style to update the grub file: grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/grub.cfg. You will break the system once the kernel is updated. Thanks to Jeff for reporting this problem.
Reboot the computer and verify if it worked. You will be prompted for the password twice. The first time is to decrypt the /boot partition (LUKS1), and the second time is to decrypt the / partition (LUKS2).
While GRUB asks for a passphrase to unlock the LUKS1 encrypted /boot partition, this information is not passed on to initramfs. As a result, the root (/) partition must be unlocked once again during the initramfs stage. This implies that either the user has to enter his passphrase twice, or the initramfs image itself has to contain a file with the passphrase of the root partition.
Congrats! You have now secured your Fedora 35 Workstation Linux distribution with LUKS full disk encryption. Going from here, check out my other blog about how you can make your computer's pre-boot environment even more secure against Evil Maid attacks by using UEFI Secure Boot custom key enrollment and a self-signed kernel and bootloader.
The criteria " Drive Capacity MB" does not seem to work here, if I enter the value "35000", almost all computers are displayed to me except for 2 - if I enter "350000", it is still over 90% of the computers, what is actually displayed here? However, a test with 3500000 (3,500,000) shows me 0 computers. So is my way the right one or not?
@mreichenauer I have a smart group setup (not a search) and I have that group added to the exclusions of the Big Sur install policy. Isn't that what you also want? You need to use the 'show advanced critieria' option at top of the smart group, to see the required criteria.
thanks, but you can only do this via the normal computer search, not via a dynamic group. the point is that only users with more than 35 GB of free memory are entitled to install big sur. there is a bug that destroys data if you try to upgrade from catalina to big sur with less memory. i would like to add this dynamic computer group to the policy.
Hi, @geoff_widdowson @mickl089 from my understanding, Boot Drive information would not be as valuable in determining whether a drive has enough disk space to run the Big Sur update on. I believe you (we) are both looking for the APFS "Data" volume information to be presented as a criterion under "show advanced criteria."
Jamf's purpose is to simplify work by helping organizations manage and secure an Apple experience that end users love and organizations trust. Jamf is the only company in the world that provides a complete management and security solution for an Apple-first environment that is enterprise secure, consumer simple and protects personal privacy. Learn about Jamf.
This site contains User Content submitted by Jamf Nation community members. Jamf does not review User Content submitted by members or other third parties before it is posted. All content on Jamf Nation is for informational purposes only. Information and posts may be out of date when you view them. Jamf is not responsible for, nor assumes any liability for any User Content or other third-party content appearing on Jamf Nation.
Did a 35 Pass Wipe for Free Space on Win10Pro Machine 1 Terabyte HDD NTFS. Before the wipe, the drive had 500 GB of data. After the wipe was complete, it now has 900 GB of data but I can't find the extra 400 GB. Is the 400 GB the 1's and 0's that were written on the free space? I did not do a "Wipe MFT Free Space" as I'm now afraid to wipe again. Any ideas on how to get my 400 GB back? Thanks.
Yep. Thought that would do it but it didn't. Drive properties still showing the extra 400 GB. BTW - No wierd looking file names in Explorer either. I only have 6 or so directories on the drive so CCleaner did not write any thing that I can see except for those dog-gone 1's and 0's - lol
Overwriting 35 times is, well, what can I say, rather excessive. That's writing about 18 terabytes of data to your drive when a single pass of 500 gb would have done just as well. The 35 pass overwrite is pointless, decades out of date and a waste of your time which you could spend mining for bitcoins, or some other ridiculous exercise the human race is prone to follow.
You could download Recuva (portable) if you haven't alrready, in Advanced Mode Options/Actions check Scan for Non-Deleted Files (don't check Deep Scan) and run it. Then l/click on the State column header to sort the results, which will bring the Non deleted files to the top, and look if there are any unrecognised large files there. Or l/click on Size to order by size. If you find anything you can then delete them in Explorer, not Recuva.There are other ways of finding files on a disk, I'm sure.
Tried Recuva. Didn't work. Explorer says 1 TB drive is Healthy, 0% Fragmented, and no partitions when viewed through Disk Manager. What the heck? 400 GB I oughta see something. Want to try CCleaner 1-Pass Overwrite on top of the 35-Pass to see if it solves the problem but afraid I'll run out of disk space if this happens again.
DAH - Found the problem. Not related to CCleaner. I showed hidden files and saw a backup on the drive that I didn't notice before. Deleted the archived backup copies and whalla! Got my space back. - DAH. Sorry for thinking it was the 35-pass wipe and taking up your time but you guys did help in getting me to think about this until I got it fixed. Thanks!
you do realize 35 passes was designed to use random encoding on drives from 1996 and before that. Nearly all of it's passes do nothing. Logical guess it's retained to stop weekly threads asking for it to be implemented. Peter Gutmanns follow up. "years" later.
In fact performing the full 35-pass overwrite is pointless for any drive since it targets a blend of scenarios involving all types of (normally-used) encoding technology, which covers everything back to 30+-year-old MFM methods (if you don't understand that statement, re-read the paper). If you're using a drive which uses encoding technology X, you only need to perform the passes specific to X, and you never need to perform all 35 passes.
Expanding on that even back in 1996 35 passes was pointless. It was a method designed to cover all bases, which was not understood by most and lead to a lot of criticism. It was never intended to set a standard. Was simply his own work.
Another factor on whether you need to wipe the drive is the wear effect. If LUKS will encrypt the entire data partition, then it might be best for the hardware if you do not wipe the drive. Write operations are destructive to SSDs, although modern SSDs are capable of very many r/w operations. Nothing to worry about if you need to wipe the disk, but something to consider if wiping is optional.
S.M.A.R.T. values and task manager after a game of warzoneI have a problem with my memory and disk usage.I have tried fixing it many times but without result. Its an MSI GL73 8RC with:WINDOWS 10, I dont know what version.CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8750H 2.20 GHzGPU: NVIDIA Geforce RTX 1050RAM: 8GB2 hard disks: one SSD with 128GB and another one HDD with 1TB.All of my games are installed on- and using - biggest disk (HDD 1TB).When idle (doing nothing) my memory usage is about 35-40%, when playing games this can go up to around 70-90%, is this normal? When playing games this can go up to around 70-90%. Then when im playing a big game like GTA my disk usage stays at 100% for most of the time wich causes framedrops (I think). And when I play a smaller game such as FIFA 20 it also happens but less frequent. Can somebody help me with this problem? Thanks in advance.
b1e95dc632