I think if they had been able to round up more of the surviving original performers, a 50th event might have been something. Well, maybe not ShaNaNa. I recall Woodstock 25 being a big deal when I was in college, but I also recall it had little resemblance to the original other than the name (if memory serves, the owners of the farm where Woodstock took place even denied access to Woodstock 25).
As a piece of history, Woodstock was a grand event where counter-culture combined with pop-culture, if not for the first time, then certainly on a massive scale. To dismiss its significance is to dismiss the significance music, drugs, and free love had on that generation. They didn’t end war or levitate the Pentagon, but that generation became hard to ignore after that music festival.
Coachella and Stagecoach are both just down the road from me, and if I enjoyed the heat of the desert or being in confined spaces with large crowds of people who don’t have access to shower facilities, there are certainly musical acts I’d enjoy hearing. But it’ll be years before we can say whether any cultural importance can be gleaned from the modern festivals. The messages of peace, love, and the freedom to be unique might not be overly revolutionary, even in 1969, but I think they resonate louder than anything coming out of the deserts outsides of Palm Springs these days.
If it can be said that WWII veterans were the Greatest Generation, honorable mention has to go to the generation of hippies that most took advantage of the freedoms (maybe even overindulged) provided by the Allied victory. So many musicians, artists, and writers from that era have left us; it might have been special to see the survivors come together one last time to share a stage.
--
Kevin M. (RPCV)