And from Chicago, you can keep her. She was on WMAQ around the same time Jon
"Access Hollywood" Kelly had bumped better veterans from the sports desk, and
Carol Marin was quitting over shortlived editorialist Jerry Springer. They're
only now starting to recover, yet the local pre-Today show (complete with
storefront window studio) is still promoted with near bloopers of a segment on
"Meet the Fockers".
But thanks for the link if only to see the KPIX news director's blog
(
http://www2.cbs5.com/newsdirector/) and this great exchange on the true IMBS
story of the season:
Finger Display (link)
Apr 14, 2005 5:55 pm
Please don't show the picture of the "Wendy's" finger again. It was awful that
this was aired. I will not be watching Channel 5 for awhile.
Kathy
We had a lot of discussion about whether to show the severed finger in the
strange continuing saga of the finger in the chili. We decided to show both it
and a finger bitten off by a wild cat so viewers could compare the two and
decide whether they were one and the same, as some allege. The first finger
picture is not particularly gruesome, and we removed unsightly aspects of the
second finger before showing it.
Appetizing? No, but essential to telling this bizarre story.
Note: We also decided to stop referring to it as the "Wendy's" finger, since it
now seems entirely possible that Wendy's had absolutely nothing to do with its
appearance, and it is unfair for the company to be continually associated with
it.
Chilli Finger Chills (link)
May 24, 2005 4:47 pm
I watch Channel 5 news almost exclusively. This evening I watched yet another
story about the incident with the finger in the chili. This one was about a
news reporter who hounded the man who lost his finger. We were shown the man
losing his temper and then your reporter explained to the viewers that you were
getting emails complaining about the story but that "we just don't understand".
Well, I think we do understand better than he realizes. In fact, I respectfully
suggest that we are all sick and tired of this story but the media hasn't yet
figured that out. Now that the mystery has been solved it's just another story
that has been beaten to death. Surely there is something more newsworthy.
Find something else to talk about, please! In fairness to you, all your
colleagues at other channels are doing the same thing, but since I watch your
show I would really love to see an end to this non-story.
Thank you. Elizabeth
Few recent stories have created as much response from viewers as the "chili
finger." Many people have written to say they're sick of it; even more,
however, want to know every new development. My view: It's certainly possible
to beat this (or any other story) to death, but when we learn, say, the
identity of the man who apparently owned the finger, it's newsworthy!
Several viewers complained that our reporter and photographer badgered this
man, who seems to have sold his severed finger for $50. However, I'm not sure
it's harassment when we ask a man for comment after he's been bragging in a bar
about being the owner of the finger in the chili. When it became clear he
didn't want to talk to us (he knocked our photographer over), we left him
alone.
As for the story, I think it's an outlandish news story, but a classic. It
hardly ranks in importance with the serious stuff of daily news: the war in
Iraq, the state of our schools, the battle over judges. But while newscasts
have a primary responsibility to report and illuminate matters of importance,
there should be room for the offbeat and unusual -- the things that astound and
amuse. There are a lot of ways to define "news," but one criterion certainly is
"what people are talking about." By that standard, the chili finger is right up
there.