Asteroid 152637

0 views
Skip to first unread message

John Garrett

unread,
Jun 27, 2026, 10:55:25 AM (7 days ago) Jun 27
to TVA
Tonight is the nearest approach of Asteroid 152637, a kilometer-sized rock passing at about 2.6 million kilometers. It is 10+ magnitude.

Attached are images I took last night 10 minutes apart. Each image is a 20-second exposure through my 3-inch scope at F5 and ISO 400. Fortunately, I have a very wide field of view that compensated for my error in pointing to the predicted coordinates.

The gif animation is cropped to about 35% of the original field of view in my 3-inch telescope.

In my original images, the 20-second exposure shows the asteroid as a streik, so if you can find it in your scope, you'll see it moving against the background. Good luck.

jg
asteroid152637_10min_tv76f5iso400.gif
asteroid152637_10min_tv76f5.jpg
asteroid152637_00min_tv76f5.jpg

Jim Sappington

unread,
Jun 28, 2026, 10:59:31 AM (6 days ago) Jun 28
to John Garrett, TVA
Nice catch, John. That is a tough target. With all of them flying around up there, seems it would be difficult to distinguish it from a satellite!  
Jim

--
TVA Home Page: http://www.temeculavalleyastronomers.com/
Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/TemeculaValleyAstronomers
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TVAstronomers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tvastronomer...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tvastronomers/CADZvaa15t6sNCnHKrLfFR-ARRfs5D-CK%2BcA2Zi2%3DK1BMnuZF6Q%40mail.gmail.com.

John Garrett

unread,
Jun 28, 2026, 11:57:51 AM (6 days ago) Jun 28
to Jim Sappington, TVA
Good point, Jim. I don't know that it's not a satellite. I could have confirmation bias. However, my experience is that satellites move faster against the background. For example, I have a wide-field photo of a comet that has satellite streaks of uniform length, suggesting they are all in orbit at about the same height. Of course, only the fast moving satellites would be noticeable in the attached photo (which is about 5-15 seconds; I forget the exact exposure). However, there is a hard cutoff in this photo: 11 of similar lengths, but no distribution including slower or faster moving satellites. This leads me to think that anything as slow as what I observed Friday, must be beyond earth's satellite zone. 

jg
--
Astronomy club website: www.temeculavalleyastronomers.com
 
Personal web containing light pollution information and science presentations: jgscience.org
 
Climate science website: www.skepticalscience.com
satellitesgallore.jpg

Jim Sappington

unread,
Jun 28, 2026, 1:49:11 PM (6 days ago) Jun 28
to John Garrett, TVA
Seems very logical, John. I agree with your thinking. 


On Jun 28, 2026, at 8:57 AM, John Garrett <garr...@gmail.com> wrote:


<satellitesgallore.jpg>
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages