请教：Tuscany 1.x 与 Tuscany 2.0到底有什么区别？

[rgc]

官方文档说实现的sca specification不同，sca 1.0 与1.1有什么不同？

由于sca1.0与1.1的不同，导致Tuscany1.x与2.0有什么不同？

[Raymond Feng]

The differences between SCA 1.0 and 1.1 are not significant. Most of the concepts stay the same. A few things:

* XML namespace changes

* Removal of the Conversation scopes and related annotations

* SCA reference @target resolution from the services

* @AllowsPassByReference between references and service impls

* A lot of clarifications about some details

* Policy attachment

Tuscany 2.x supports OSGi and the latest SCA 1.1 specs. From the runtime perspectives, it's similar but more robust.

If possible, you should try to use Tuscany 2.x now. It's pretty stable. Our employer has it in production for a while. 

Thanks,

Raymond

On Apr 23, 2012, at 5:26 AM, rgc wrote:

官方文档说实现的sca specification不同，sca 1.0 与1.1有什么不同？

由于sca1.0与1.1的不同，导致Tuscany1.x与2.0有什么不同？

--
您收到此邮件是因为您订阅了 Google 网上论坛的“Tuscany SCA 中文论坛”论坛。
要在网络上查看此讨论，请访问 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/tuscany-sca-chinese/-/zCy1qikiGEQJ。
要向此网上论坛发帖，请发送电子邮件至 tuscany-s...@googlegroups.com。
要取消订阅此网上论坛，请发送电子邮件至 tuscany-sca-chi...@googlegroups.com。
若有更多问题，请通过 http://groups.google.com/group/tuscany-sca-chinese?hl=zh-CN 访问此网上论坛。

[rgc]

谢谢ls 对我的问题的回答，但2.x的文档很少，个人感觉使用2.x的难度比1.6要大，请问您那边还有2.x的相关文档？

有的话请发我一份，thx

在 2012年4月24日星期二UTC+8上午2时43分39秒，Raymond Feng写道：

[Raymond Feng]

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/OSOA+SCA+vs+OASIS+SCA

http://tuscany.apache.org/documentation-2x/

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYxDOCx2x/Index

--
您收到此邮件是因为您订阅了 Google 网上论坛的“Tuscany SCA 中文论坛”论坛。

要在网络上查看此讨论，请访问 https://groups.google.com/d/msg/tuscany-sca-chinese/-/05OblCDnDpwJ。