I'm curious as to why TurboVNC and
TigerVNC are listed as "unauthorized". Is that just due to the
fact that no one has gone to the trouble of qualifying them, or
is there a known issue that prevents them from being
acceptable? TurboVNC and TigerVNC are the best-maintained and
most secure open source VNC viewers out there, so if they aren't
authorized, then you're not likely to find another open source
VNC viewer that is authorized (except perhaps by way of an error
of omission.) If there is an issue that prevents TurboVNC from
being acceptable, then I am more than happy to fix it, but if it
is being rejected out of some bureaucratic technological
misunderstanding, then there isn't much I can do about that.
Your only hope would be if the RealVNC Viewer is authorized and
supports the VeNCrypt extensions, but I'm not aware that it
does. ACLs are fortunately a server-side extension, so they
don't require explicit client support. You would just need to
find an authorized VNC viewer that supports VeNCrypt.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboVNC User Discussion/Support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to turbovnc-user...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/turbovnc-users/0216818f-6718-40b5-948f-afef1c77a013n%40googlegroups.com.