[tungsten-replicator] r2820 committed - Edited wiki page HowToSubmitAGoodBugReport through web user interface.

1 view
Skip to first unread message

tungsten-...@googlecode.com

unread,
Aug 24, 2015, 11:34:08 AM8/24/15
to tungsten-re...@googlegroups.com
Revision: 2820
Author: mc.b...@continuent.com
Date: Mon Aug 24 15:31:09 2015 UTC
Log: Edited wiki page HowToSubmitAGoodBugReport through web user
interface.
https://code.google.com/p/tungsten-replicator/source/detail?r=2820

Modified:
/wiki/HowToSubmitAGoodBugReport.wiki

=======================================
--- /wiki/HowToSubmitAGoodBugReport.wiki Wed May 15 04:19:16 2013 UTC
+++ /wiki/HowToSubmitAGoodBugReport.wiki Mon Aug 24 15:31:09 2015 UTC
@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
#summary How to submit a good database bug report
#labels Featured,Phase-QA
+==Tungsten Replicator, Apache 2.0 Licensed and on Github==
+
+The Tungsten Replicator project has moved to an Apache 2.0 license, and
the code is now hosted on [http://github.com/vmware/tungsten-replicator
Github].
+
= How to submit a good database bug report =

When an open source project becomes popular, bug reports start flocking
in. This is both good and bad news for the project developers. The good
news is that someone is using the product, and they are finding ways of
breaking it that we didn't think of. The bad news is that most of the times
the reporters assume that the developers have super human powers, and that
they will find what's wrong by the simple mentioning that a given feature
is not working as expected. Unfortunately, it doesn't work that way. An
effective bug report should have enough information that the ones in charge
will be able to reproduce it and examine in lab conditions to find the
problem. When dealing with databases and database tools, there are several
cases, from simple to complex. Let's cover them in order.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages