Rolph you said he made up for his lack of moral strength by physical strength, but which one is more important when fighting a war? If a soldier lacks too many morals than he could do things he ends up regreting or he might not have that drive to fight.
Do you think personal morals are more important than loyalty to one's country or is it the other way around?
On Feb 6, 2011 5:45 PM, "Zoe Kopin" <zoexka...@aim.com> wrote:
I agree with Andre. I believe that O'Brien was brave for going
to war, even though it was against his beliefs. As Andre said, the
majority of soldiers that got drafted probably did not want to go to
war, but it was their duty as citizens. When O'Brien first read his
draft letter, he thought "A million things all at once-I was too good
for this war" (O'Brien 41). O'Brien believed that the war was wrong
and that he should not be a part of it, and made the decision to flee
to Canada. Had he gone through with his plan, he would have been a
coward for fleeing his duties as a United States citizen. Other men
whom were drafted also probably had morals and did not agree with all
aspects of the war. Although personal morals are important, loyalty
to one's country is also important. This is why I believe O'Brien was
extremely brave for going to war. Although it was not in his personal
interest, he realized that he had an obligation to be a part of the
war.
On Feb 6, 4:11 pm, Casey <jin9le6ells2...@aol.com> wrote: > Carla you have made some great points a...