On Apr 23, 12:32 am, "Christopher Kevill"
RM: Hi Chris, it's good to see you back in circulation. I'm still
trying to get a handle on this whole series of graphs. It might only
be chance at play for all I know, but as I indicated in an earlier
post I've set out to examine a lot of things from the perspective of
one-to-one instead of one-to-many, in order to be able to get real
results without using the ridiculous amounts of data that are required
to reach the 0.05 level *IF* it exists for any given astro-factor that
I am looking at.
As it's turned out, the idea is working and we've got some clear-cut
things to look at, so I suppose one good question is "How often do
graphs like these occur by chance?" Some would say that it depends on
how many places you look, but in this series of graphs I've looked in
only 7 places and got 7 hits. The Libra-Gemini-Alcoholic thing was not
specially selected -- it was simply the highest and lowest scores
*where* the difference was quite significant.
It would be interesting to look at some similar sidereal things as
well in the near future.
I'm hoping that this unusual way of looking at data will allow us to
see enough to make further progress. Theoretically with this system we
should be able to compare some of the extremes we see in astrology, so
we can compare things that are typically quite different between signs
(or whatever) -- rather than trying to compare one thing with ALL
signs or ALL aspects. An analogy would be comparing Texans and
Canadians in football, rather than Texans against the world. It's
easier to prove the former.
Ray