marpers flecher waldina
Eleanora Parrot
You are leaving cadillaccanada.ca to visit a website that is operated independently and not maintained by General Motors of Canada and where the General Motors of Canada privacy policy does not apply.
This link is provided to you for convenience and does not serve as an endorsement by General Motors of Canada of information or content that you may find on this site.
The Domestic Substances List (DSL) is an inventory of substances manufactured in, or imported into Canada on a commercial scale. It was originally published in the Canada Gazette Part II on May 4, 1994 and included approximately 23 000 substances deemed to have been in Canadian commerce between January 1984 and December 1986. The DSL is amended, on average, 12 times per year to add, update or delete substances. It now contains more than 28 000 substances and can be accessed through Substances Search.
Substances on the DSL are grouped into 8 parts and may have one or more of 5 available flags applied to them. For example, the N flag indicates that the substance was notified and assessed as a new substance, and subsequently added to the DSL.
Substances not on the DSL are considered new to Canada. Prior to being imported or manufactured over certain threshold, they must be notified and assessed to determine if they are toxic or could become toxic.
Under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (CEPA), any person (individual or corporation) manufacturing a new substance in or importing a new substance into Canada must provide a new substances notification containing the information prescribed by the New Substances Notification Regulations (Chemicals and Polymers) or the New Substances Notification Regulations (Organisms). Substances on the DSL do not require notification unless they are subject to significant new activity (SNAc) requirements.
Under CEPA, any information provided to the Minister of the Environment and Climate Change may be claimed confidential. When substance identity is considered confidential, CEPA allows for the publication of masked substance names on the DSL. Therefore, confidential substances on the DSL are identified by a masked name, regulated under the Masked Name Regulations and a unique confidential substance identity number assigned by Environment and Climate Change Canada. This number is also referred to as a confidential accession number (CAN).
Sets out chemicals and polymers that are identified by their Chemical Abstracts Services (CAS) registry numberFootnote 1 , or their Substance Identity Number assigned by the Department of the Environment and the name of the substance
Sets out inanimate products of biotechnology and living organisms that are identified by their American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) number, International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (IUBMB) number* or specific substance name
P flag: indicates that the substance was added to the DSL on the basis that it met the Reduced Regulatory Requirement (RRR) polymer criteria; any form of the substance that does not meet the RRR polymer criteria is subject to notification prior to import or manufacture
N flag: indicates that the substance was notified and assessed as a new substance after July 1, 1994, and subsequently added to the DSL based on its manufacture in or import into Canada
The Chemical Abstracts Service registry number is the property of the American Chemical Society and any use or redistribution, except as required in supporting regulatory requirements and/or for reports to the Government of Canada when the information and the reports are required by law or administrative policy, is not permitted without the prior, written permission of the American Chemical Society.
Environment and Climate Change Canada is responsible for producing Canada's official National Greenhouse Gas Inventory (Opens in a new window) and associated report (National Inventory Report: Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Canada (Opens in a new window)). Canada's official greenhouse gas (GHG) inventory fulfills Canada's reporting obligations under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (Opens in a new window), and is the official benchmark for greenhouse gas emissions in Canada.
To select a specific category or sub-category, select the desired toggle elements within the tool box on the left hand side (i.e., Industry or Reference period). Depending on the data views selected, multiple choices may be available for subject categories, geographies, reference periods, etc. To view the associated data, select the "Data table" tab located on the top right hand corner of the data visualisation.
To access other available options, such as to export or sort, position your mouse over the top right hand corner of the data visualisation then select the three consecutive points [...] that will appear. From there you can then select the desired option that follows (Export data, Show as a table, Spotlight).
The Canada Land Inventory is a comprehensive multi-disciplinary land inventory of rural Canada, covering over 2.5 million square kilometers of land and water. Land capability for agriculture, forestry, wildlife, recreation, wildlife (ungulates and waterfowl) was mapped. Over 1000 mapsheets at the 1:250,000 scale were created during the 1960's, 70s, and early 80's. Although the information is old, and better information is available for some areas as part of more recent soil surveys, the interpretations are still largely valid, and many jurisdictions still use them for land use planning purposes.
There are seven classes used to rate agricultural land capability. Class 1 lands have the highest and Class 7 lands the lowest capability to support agricultural land use activities. Subclasses are used to identify specific limiting factors for each class. For more information on CLI classes, view the overview of classification methodology.
Anyone may use these data free of charge, provided they acknowledgeAgriculture and Agri-food Canada's authorship. AAFC retains exclusive rights, title, and ownership of this data. Copying and redistribution of part or all of this dataset is acceptable, provided that the contents of this file are included with the redistribution.
Please note: as of April 2018, the NEB (now the CER) has changed the format of its LPG underground inventory statistics. In addition to the previous annual summary, the monthly download now provides historical inventory data from 2000 to the present. A graphical representation of regional propane and butane inventories is now displayed in an interactive format.
Do I track the raw materials I purchased (to be made into a finished good) as an Expense in my T2 (Selling Expense, Supplies, etc) as well as including its cost as inventory (finished and raw) or is it one or the other?
Where my confusion is (I think), is by tracking the raew material as an expense and as part of a finished good in inventory (or as a raw material) it feels like its double-dipping (recording the same items more than once).
As per CRA, you can enter your opening inventory amount at line 8300 and your closing inventory amount at line 8500 of your T2125. These amounts must include raw materials, goods in process and finished goods. The way you value your inventory is important in determining your income. For income tax purposes, choose one of the following two methods:
Thanks very much for your response. However it didnt answer my question specifically. Do I still include my purchases raw materials as an expense outside of inventory or just as inventory? Also for the two methods, am I free to choose as fair market value would be higher than the cost.
Starting in 2009, the Earth Observation Team of the Science and TechnologyBranch (STB) at Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) began the processof generating annual crop type digital maps. Focusing on the PrairieProvinces in 2009 and 2010, a Decision Tree (DT) based methodology wasapplied using optical (Landsat-5, AWiFS, DMC) and radar (Radarsat-2) basedsatellite images. Beginning with the 2011 growing season, this activity hasbeen extended to other provinces in support of a national crop inventory.To date this approach can consistently deliver a crop inventory that meetsthe overall target accuracy of at least 85% at a final spatial resolution of30m (56m in 2009 and 2010).
Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
Yellow dots indicate the 3469 facilities and 5592 wells within five regions (blue polygon) surveyed using Bridger Photonics GML. Dashed red polygons show mass-balance survey regions flown by Scientific Aviation.
The present hybrid measurement-based inventory is parsed by measured sources, unmeasured non-pneumatic sources, and unmeasured pneumatics and suggests provincial emissions are 1.5 times greater than the latest official inventory from Environment and Climate Change Canada7 (ECCC). Parallel inventory estimates for 2018-2020 using satellite measurements22 and 2021 using region-level aerial measurements (see SI Section S5) are shown for comparison. 95% CIs are shown for each estimate according to the methodologies detailed in the SI; a secondary confidence interval is shown for the present hybrid inventory (light green) that upper bounds the potential effect of source intermittency (see statistical testing and analysis in SI Section S4 and Johnson et al.20).
The observed discrepancy between the official and hybrid top-down/bottom-up, measurement-based inventories is not novel to the province of Alberta nor the measurement year. Significant discrepancies between aerial/satellite measured/estimated inventories and official bottom-up inventories or industry-reported emissions have been observed previously in sub-regions of Alberta in 201612, the neighbouring province of British Columbia (BC) in 201918 and 202120, and numerous basins in the U.S.22,26,27. However, the present inventory for Alberta and the 2021 inventory for BC20 are unique in that approximately 76 and 78% of the inventories, respectively, are based on direct measurements at the source level. This permits robust characterization of measurement uncertainties and consideration of sample size effects20 and, following manual attribution of individual sources to specific equipment types, enables a detailed breakdown of the inventory by source (see below and Johnson et al.28).
c01484d022