Fwd: CONFIRMATION of ROWLEY's FABRICATION, FRAUDULENT "EMAILS": renowned forensic computer scientist says ROWLEY's mails are "of a fraudulent nature"__Fwd: ANALYSIS of ROWLEY's WHISTLEBLOWER DOCUMENT - Part 1

12 views
Skip to first unread message

CCDSJ_TT

unread,
Jun 16, 2013, 6:20:16 PM6/16/13
to caribbeantalk, CongressOfThePeople, theunit...@yahoogroups.com, jahajee...@yahoogroups.com, PeoplesPa...@yahoogroups.com, ourg...@yahoogroups.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------

well, we told you that some time ago, see mails below for the most recent analysis ....

CONFIRMATION of ROWLEY's FABRICATION, FRAUDULENT "EMAILS": An internationally renowned forensic computer scientist has concluded that the alleged emails presented by Opp. Leader Dr. Keith Rowley are "of a fraudulent nature"
An internationally renowned forensic computer scientist has concluded that the alleged emails presented by Opp. Leader Dr. Keith Rowley are "of a fraudulent nature"


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: CCDSJ_TT <ccds...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, May 25, 2013 at 10:17 PM
Subject: Fwd: ANALYSIS of ROWLEY's WHISTLEBLOWER DOCUMENT - Part 1
To: CCDSJ INTL <CCDS...@gmail.com>


---------- Forwarded message ----------

Analysis in RED of the EXPRESS version of the Whistleblower document



The EXPRESS version is different from the one given to Members of Parliament after Rowley spoke on the NO CONFIDENCE motion. Both versions are also different from what Rowley said in Parliament, see ANDRE BAGOO's NEWSDAY article on this:
 http://newsday.co.tt/politics/0,178152.html

This is Part 1 with analysis of a few alleged emails.

The following is the email trail from the EXPRESS

LET's start with the first alleged gmail:
 
[1] From: an...@gmail.com

Date: Sat 2 Sep 2012 22:11:00 – 0400

To: kaml...@gmail.com

Subject: RE: Update

My lady, please relax, everything is in place, nothing to worry about. We will soon chat.
 
 
  1. The order of the header of the alleged mail above is wrong. A Gmail has the following structure:
      From:
      To:
      Date:
      Subject:
      
       The header structure in the alleged mail is:
       From:
       Date:
       To:
       Subject:

The DATE and TO lines in the header of the alleged GMAIL are not in the correct order. Thus, the above cannot be a printout of a GMAIL Obviously, it is a fabricated mail.


2. The DATE format is wrong.
    Below are the two possible DATE formats of a genuine GMAIL that is sent or received - this is fact and easily verifiable, not an opinion.
Sat, May 25, 2013 at 10:45 AM  or Sat, 25 May 2013 07:45:28 -0700 (PDT)  

Below is the DATE from the alleged GMAIL:
Sat 2 Sep 2012 22:11:00 – 0400

Note the differences: the alleged gmail DATE as no comma or commas between day and day numbers. In addition, the format of the time with GMT time difference is different with a different location of the dash. Thus, this cannot be a printout of a genuine GMAIL, but a fabricated one, and poorly done.

3. The DATE is wrong - mismatch in day and day number
Sep 2nd 2012 was a SUNDAY, not a SATURDAY. This is fact, you can verify in any calendar in any part of the world, whatever time zone.
Thus, the above alleged mail cannot be a printout from a genuine mail since the genuine mail will have the correct date.

 
4.
There is no gmail account named "AN...@gmail.com" because you cannot create a GMAIL account with a name that has FOUR characters.   It must be at least SIX characters long. This is fact, a GMAIL rule, not an opinion. Hence, an...@gmail.com is a bogus mail account and you cannot send nor receive an mail from a non-existent bogus gmail account. All alleged emails sent to or received from the non-existent an...@gmail.com are fabricated emails.

Let's analyse the second alleged Gmail.
 

[2] Subject: Re: What’s up

To: an...@gmail.com

From: kaml...@gmail.com

Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 02:07:36 +0000

I am worried AG. I do not want this to blow up in our faces. This has to be done seamlessly.

1. The order of the header of the alleged mail above is wrong. A Gmail has the following structure:
      From:
      To:
      Date:
      Subject:
      
       The header structure in the alleged mail is:
       Subject:
       To:
        From:
        Date:

The SUBJECT, DATE, and FROM lines in the header of the alleged GMAIL are not in the correct order. Only the TO line is in the correct location. Thus, the above cannot be a printout of a GMAIL Obviously, it is a fabricated mail.

2. There is no gmail account named "AN...@gmail.com" because you cannot create a GMAIL account with a name that has FOUR characters.   It must be at least SIX characters long. This is fact, a GMAIL rule, not an opinion. Hence, an...@gmail.com is a bogus mail account and you cannot send nor receive an mail from a non-existent bogus gmail account. All alleged emails sent to or received from the non-existent an...@gmail.com are fabricated emails.


Let's analyse alleged mail #3

[3] Subject: Re: Update

To: anan@gmail.com;an...@tstt.net.tt

From: kaml...@gmail.com

Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 02:15:14 +0000

How are things going with this, do you need to brief me on anything. Did you make contact yet? Will he be on board. I don’t want surprises.


1. The order of the header of the alleged mail above is wrong. A Gmail has the following structure:
      From:
      To:
      Date:
      Subject:
      
       The header structure in the alleged mail is:
       Subject:
       To:
        From:
        Date:

The SUBJECT, DATE, and FROM lines in the header of the alleged GMAIL are not in the correct order. Only the TO line is in the correct location. Thus, the above cannot be a printout of a GMAIL Obviously, it is a fabricated mail. In addition, note the wildy varying order of lines in the header for all the "mails" analysed so far! Surely, this inconsistent mail header structure cannot be that for genuine GMAILS since GMAILS have a fixed header structure with a fixed order for lines in the header.

2. There is no gmail account named "AN...@gmail.com" because you cannot create a GMAIL account with a name that has FOUR characters.   It must be at least SIX characters long. This is fact, a GMAIL rule, not an opinion. Hence, an...@gmail.com is a bogus mail account and you cannot send nor receive an mail from a non-existent bogus gmail account. All alleged emails sent to or received from the non-existent an...@gmail.com are fabricated emails.


Alleged email # 4

[4] From: an...@gmail.com

Date: 9/06/12 22:02:45

To: kaml...@gmail.com

Subject: Worry not

Nothing will be traced back to you. We are always united.

1. The order of the header of the alleged mail above is wrong. A Gmail has the following structure:
      From:
      To:
      Date:
      Subject:
      
       The header structure in the alleged mail is:
       From:
       Date:
       To: 
       Subject:

The SUBJECT, DATE, and TO lines in the header of the alleged GMAIL are not in the correct order. Only the FROM line is in the correct location. Thus, the above cannot be a printout of a GMAIL Obviously, it is a fabricated mail. Again, the inconsistent order of lines in the "mail" header is indicative of fabricated mails rather than genuine GMAILS. GOOGLE maintains a fixed and consistent email header.

2. There is no gmail account named "AN...@gmail.com" because you cannot create a GMAIL account with a name that has FOUR characters.   It must be at least SIX characters long. This is fact, a GMAIL rule, not an opinion. Hence, an...@gmail.com is a bogus mail account and you cannot send nor receive an mail from a non-existent bogus gmail account. All alleged emails sent to or received from the non-existent an...@gmail.com are fabricated emails.


3.  DATE FORMAT is wrong, totally wrong. GMAIL never has a DATE format as this in the alleged email:

Date: 9/06/12 22:02:45

NEVER!
The DATE format is one of these two, dependening on whether the mail is sent or recieved.
Sat, May 25, 2013 at 10:45 AM  or Sat, 25 May 2013 07:45:28 -0700 (PDT)



Alleged email # 5

[5] Subj: Monies owed

Date: 9/06/12 11:38:04 AM SA Western Standard Time

From: kaml...@gmail.com

To: an...@gmail.com

CC:

Are you sure everything is in place. Did you chat with the DPP and ask him about it? Try and find out.

Btw, she says you are asking for much money.

1. The Subject label is never Subj as it is in this alleged mail. GMAIL always uses "Subject", not any abbreviation such as "Subj"
Thus, this is not a printout of a genuine GMAIL, but a fabricated mail.

2. The carbon copy (cc) label in GMAIL is never uppercase "CC" as in this alleged mail. It is Cc or cc

2.  The order of the header of the alleged mail above is wrong. A Gmail has the following structure:
      From:
      To:
      Date:
      Subject:
      
       The header structure in the alleged mail is:
       Subj:
       Date:
       From: 
       To:

The SUBJECT, DATE,  TO, and FROM lines in the header of the alleged GMAIL are not in the correct order.  Thus, the above cannot be a printout of a GMAIL Obviously, it is a fabricated mail. Again, the inconsistent order of lines in the "mail" header is indicative of fabricated mails rather than genuine GMAILS. GOOGLE maintains a fixed and consistent email header.

3. There is no gmail account named "AN...@gmail.com" because you cannot create a GMAIL account with a name that has FOUR characters.   It must be at least SIX characters long. This is fact, a GMAIL rule, not an opinion. Hence, an...@gmail.com is a bogus mail account and you cannot send nor receive an mail from a non-existent bogus gmail account. All alleged emails sent to or received from the non-existent an...@gmail.com are fabricated emails.


4. DATE FORMAT is wrong, totally wrong. GMAIL never has a DATE format as this in the alleged email:

Date: 9/06/12 11:38:04 AM SA Western Standard Time

NEVER!
The DATE format is one of these two, dependening on whether the mail is sent or recieved.
Sat, May 25, 2013 at 10:45 AM  or Sat, 25 May 2013 07:45:28 -0700 (PDT) 




[6] Subject: Re: Monies owed

TO: kaml...@gmail.com

From: an...@gmail.com

Date: 9/06/12 12:15:01

I scoff that it’s too much. We are the ones taking the risk. At the end of this I want a helipad on my roof top.

There is no price for freedom they know this. I do not know why you engage her.

I am yet to approach him, but will do soon.



[7] Subject: Re: Monies owed

To: an...@gmail.com; an...@tstt.net.tt

From: kaml...@gmail.com

Date: 9/06/12 12:35:45

It’s not a matter of engaging, she has done so much for us and I appreciate her. Tone down your requests and focus elsewhere for now.



[8] Subject: Re: Monies owed

To: kaml...@gmail.com

From: an...@gmail.com

Date:9/06/12 12:45:11

As you wish my lady, Take care and we shall chat later.



[9] From an...@gmail.com

Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 22:15:40-0500

To: captainga...@hotmail.com;Roo...@tstt.net.tt;surujr...@hotmail.com

Subject: Help needed

There’s an article a reporter from Guardian called me about involving our boys. I need you to get your feelers out there and nip the story. Call the Sunday Guardian Editor and threaten her with ads if you have too just make sure the article does not come out. Will call you later.



[10] Subject: Meeting

On Sat. Sep 8, 2012 at 10:06:05 PM, wrote

Call a meeting, we need to talk urgently



[11]From: kaml...@gmail.com

Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2012 14:51:18-0500

To: an...@gmail.com;an...@tstt.net

Subject: Guardian article

AR:

What is going? Did you see the article. I thought you had friends in the Guardian. How could this happen? Fix it.



[12] On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 2:51 PM, an...@gmail.com wrote:

I saw the article. Not to worry, remember Opposition supported this. That will be our defense



[13] FROM: kaml...@gmail.com

TO: an...@gmail.com; an...@tstt.net.tt

Sunday, September 9, 2012 10:27 PM

Deal with this mess.

Did she speak with James? You said he could be trusted. Does she have a copy?



[14] Sunday, September 9, 2012 10:30PM

James knows he cannot say anything. I doubt she has a copy. She is bluffing. I will retain him to write a letter refuting what she said. I sent out a release already. Remember everyone supported this. The PNM will loose out for allowing this to happen. Do not worry.



[15] FROM: an...@gmail.com

TO: captainga...@hotmail.com

Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:33 AM

We have a problem. Things are getting heated. Need access to taps in DPP office. I want to know what his next move is. How soon can you arrange?



[16] FROM: captainga...@hotmail.com

TO: an...@gmail.com; an...@tstt.net.tt

Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:40 AM

I will call SSA and get B. Ganpat is out of the country, he would be against this move. You know he leaks





[17]On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 6:51 AM, an...@gmail.com wrote:

I gave instructions to B to sent him Germany for two weeks. I want someone to monitor DPP for this week. He made some statements. The normal protocol applies.



[18] FROM: captainga...@hotmail.com

TO: an...@gmail.com;an...@tstt.net.tt

Mon Sep 10, 2012 at …AM

Everything is already in place in DPP office. Nothing out of the ordinary yet, Spoke with PM and she is furious

about the article. What about the reporter, tag her as well? My person..Guardian said she has a copy

of Lewis advice and is just toying with you. She does have someone in the US Embassy and is asking questions.

Last time we checked she contact Counselor to the Attorney General Channing Phillips.

Do you think someone there is feeding her?



[19] On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:51 AM, an...@tstt.co.tt wrote:

That f….. whore don’t have sh… on me. More than likely she called Thomas at the Embassy.

Do a trace on her, every reporter has skeletons in their closet and post it to our FB people

Find out how the f… she quoted from something she has no access too. I want this by this evening and I want to know who is her source.



[20] FROM: captainga...@hotmail.com

TO: an...@gmail.com;an...@tstt.net.tt

Mon. Sep 10, 2012 at 11:15AM

Yes boss.

That will take the heat off a while when other things pop up. Deal with this matter AG



[21]From:kaml...@gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2012 23:51:31 -0400

To:an...@gmail.com;an...@tstt.net.tt

Subject: RE: Urgent

The US contacted me and are f…… angry, I thought you had a hold on this

This will cause major backlash. They even threatened to black-list us. Come up with a plan AG.





[22] Subject: Re: Urgent

To: kaml...@gmail.com

From: an...@gmail.com; an...@tstt.net.tt

Date:Wed, 11 Sep 2012 09:21:44 +0000

Right now our best bet will be giving Gaspard a position on the bench and bring in a replacement. We could also feed our media people that Gaspard was part of the consultation at the Hall of Justice this year and he did not have a problem at the meeting. Let’s try the judge position first.



[23] From:kaml...@gmail.com

Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2012 09:54:39

To: an...@gmail.com;an...@tstt.net.tt

Subject: RE: Urgent

Have a chat with Archie, let them offer him the position. Archie is normally co-operative.



[24]Subject: Re: Urgent

To: an...@gmail.com;an...@tstt.net.tt

From:kaml...@gmail.com

Have you dealt with the mess yet? We are getting bad press. Deal with this AG

Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2012 09:59:44



[25] Subject: Re: Urgent

To: anan@gmailcom;an...@tstt.net.tt

From:captainga...@hotmail.com

Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2012 13:00:42 -0000

How things looking? The media are having a field day, PM is angry. The US also on the case.



[26] Subject: Re: Urgent

To: captainga...@hotmail.com

From:an...@gmail.com

Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2012 14:00:22 +0000

Something is not right with that b..ch she knows too much. Did you find out her source? I was the only one who had this and she does not know Lewis. She does not know any QC, that I found out from her court colleague. She quoted things and asking questions to lawyers that no one knows.. did you find out anything on her..how are things at DPP.



[27] Subject: Re: Urgent

To: an...@gmail.com;an...@tstt.net.tt

From: captainga...@hotmail.com

Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2012 15:00

Will check with DPP status and give you a report later. The reporter does have a history. She has a file..it’s really touch and go. She was in Florida at an institution in late 2003. attempted suicide. Her family are PNM, dad was in jail and recently released. Also added some stuff and sent it to FB. They will take it from there.



[28] From: an...@gmail.com

Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 20:47:08

To:surujra...@hotmail.com

Subject: Deal with the problem

This b…ch is becoming a problem to me. I’m told she has copies of documents and possibly cheques I don’t want

to leave anything to chance. I want this dealt with. find a way. I passed info to FB and they would f… her up but that’s not enough. Do something to slow her, PM is angry I assured her things will be good. I feel like I failed.. just deal with that b…ch soon if she has what I think, then we will all be implicated.



[29] Subject: Re: Deal with problem

To: an...@gmail.com;an...@tstt.net.tt

From:surujra...@hotmail.com

Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 20:58:-2

What did you have in mind: Does she drive, walk, do you know her movements. We should meet and discuss. How soon.



[30] Re: Deal with problem

Hide Details

From: an...@gmail.com

To: surujra...@hotmail.com

Message flagged

Wednesday, September 19, 2012 10:00PM

I don’t care what you do, just deal with the problem soon. Gary has the file on her . Whatever is one, let it be done through a third party. This is getting out of hand now. PM is frantic and is begging me for a distraction. I don’t think anything on Hart will provide that. I gave her the assurance that things will be ok. I also advised her to get rid of Volney, but she is weighing her options.



[31] Subject: Re: deal with problem

To: an...@gmail.com; an...@tstt.net.tt

From: surujra...@hotmail.com

Date: Wed 19 Sep 2012 10:08:32

She will face opposition if she even contemplates getting rid of you. But don’t worry, we will chat tomorrow and finalize plans for that girl .
 

(Richard Charan - Multimedia Editor)
-richar...@trinidadexpress.com
 


Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages