Programming Language Popularity

14 views
Skip to first unread message

Brian Adkins

unread,
Aug 4, 2012, 3:12:16 PM8/4/12
to tri...@googlegroups.com
I just published some statistics on programming language popularity as measured by Google search results for the phrases:

written in <lang>
implemented in <lang>

It's the 5th post in a series, so you can compare over time as well. I think it may be time to knock Caml and Io off the list :)


Brian

Edward G. Savage

unread,
Aug 4, 2012, 4:13:57 PM8/4/12
to tri...@googlegroups.com, Brian Adkins
Interesting findings. That ranking doesn't exactly correlate with the job market though.

    --Ed
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TriFunc" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/trifunc/-/_0FGpcTPPrIJ.
To post to this group, send email to tri...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trifunc+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trifunc?hl=en.

Brandon Van Every

unread,
Aug 5, 2012, 11:19:11 AM8/5/12
to tri...@googlegroups.com
This seems to be a metric of the idiom "implemented / written in <L>".
I'm thinking that within broad clumps of popularity, the scores would
change if one searched for different / more idioms.

Cheers,
Brandon Van Every

Phillip Rhodes (Fogbeam Labs)

unread,
Aug 5, 2012, 12:40:54 PM8/5/12
to tri...@googlegroups.com
No Groovy? You just lost all credibility with me! :-)


Phil

Brian Adkins

unread,
Aug 5, 2012, 10:15:57 PM8/5/12
to tri...@googlegroups.com
On Sunday, August 5, 2012 12:40:54 PM UTC-4, Fogbeam Phil wrote:
No Groovy?  You just lost all credibility with me!  :-)


Phil

Interesting - I didn't expect Groovy to be so high. I've partially updated the blog post. Too much trouble to update the table, but I recorded the relevant number to allow computing a delta next time. Haskell still has a way to go to be in the top section above FORTRAN, but that sure would make my day :)

In Oct '09, Haskell was 17% of FORTRAN, yesterday it was 62%. More relevant, in Apr '09, Haskell was 2.7% of Java, yesterday it was 8.1%. That's a pretty significant shift, and I expect that trend to continue for Haskell and a few other functional languages as Moore's law continues to collapse, cores continue to multiply and programmers who have found Python, Ruby, etc. want more power plus more speed.

Brian
 
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages