Hp Service Client

0 views

Skip to first unread message

Berenice Pretlow

unread,

Aug 3, 2024, 10:56:59 AM8/3/24

to trepsepulria

Creates an instance of ServiceClient who's authentication is managed by the caller.This requires the caller to implement a function that will accept the InstanceURI as a string will return the access token as a string on demand when the ServiceClient requires it.This approach is recommended when working with WebApplications or applications that are required to implement an on Behalf of flow for user authentication.

This will force the Dataverse server to refresh the current metadata cache with current DB config.Note, that this is a performance impacting property.Use of this flag will slow down operations server side as the server is required to check for consistency of the platform metadata against disk on each API call executed.It is recommended to use this ONLY in conjunction with solution import or delete operations.

This ID is used to support Dataverse Telemetry when trouble shooting SDK based errors.When Set by the caller, all Dataverse API Actions executed by this client will be tracked under a single session id for later troubleshooting.For example, you are able to group all actions in a given run of your client ( several creates / reads and such ) under a given tracking id that is shared on all requests.providing this ID when reporting a problem will aid in trouble shooting your issue.

Provides a User ID / Password flow for authentication to the online discovery system.You can also provide the discovery instance you wish to use, or not pass it. If you do not specify a discovery region, the commercial global region is used

This function gets data from a Dictionary object, where "string" identifies the field name, and Object contains the data,this method then attempts to cast the result to the Type requested, if it cannot be cast an empty object is returned.

A Service Client is a PrinterLogic SaaS client that has been promoted to provide additional service functions within the PrinterLogic SaaS application. The Service Client machine can be a workstation or a server always available on your network.

Verify the Client is installed, authorized and pointing to the correct instance. A quick test is to click the system tray icon to open the Self-service Portal. If it opens to the correct URL, you can sign in, and see / install printers from the portal, then the client is authorized.

If the folder is created, but the token.json file is not there, you need to reauthorize the Service Client, see Reauthorization Steps. Please note that the Service Client authorization is different from the Client authorization.

I consume a WCF service asynchronously. If I can't connect to the service or an exception occurs it went to faulted state and it writes the error to the Error property of the AsyncCompletedEventArgs.

However, as of now, the above code isn't in use. For reasons I don't understand, it had a lot more access-denied exceptions than the simplest approach of invariably creating a new client for every call, and disposing it after. I never bother checking faulted state because I never use them for more than one call anyway.

...in a try/catch, of course. If you see any issues with the client-caching/Abort approach, I'd suggest you try creating a new client for every call. Maybe it costs a few cycles, but it's silly to call a web service and then start worrying about runtime efficiency. That horse has left the barn.

Here's some .tt-generated service wrapper code from our XAML application. Every web service call method gets wrapped like this, and it's been bulletproof for years. I would recommend doing essentially this:

An async design does have its advantages, so I am wondering, is it the intent of ROS2 to force asynchronous service message handling in a node or is there a way to do a sync call that I haven't uncovered yet?

Hi, I'm having the same trouble. I want to not use spin_until_future_complete in my code, because I'm already spinning the node outside of my class. I tried to use wait/wait_for/wait_until on the future, but they all never return and block forever as you described.So the only way is to use a callback? Or have you found another possibility in the meantime?

@jdlangs thanks for your answer, do you have a example or explanation on how to use callbackgroups. There is not much about this topic out there.
So when I use a callbackgroup of type Reentrant future.get() and future.wait() will work?
Because now they don't (also with MultiThreadedExecutor) .

I think your best bet right now is to create a sync_service wrapper to deal with all the async and waiting for you. Then you can use that in your code to interact with it like a synchronous operation.

This has been a major pain point for me when porting a big ROS1 code base that made synchronous service calls all the time deep inside libraries. My preferred solution to this is setting up the node and client so that the service response arrives on another thread. Then the code calling the service can just do future.get() or future.wait() to wait for the response. You need to:

Create the service client using a different callback group created using rclcpp::Node::create_callback_group. You can make group type Reentrant and then use the same group for all your callbacks or just use a separate group for the one service client.

In general I try to do this and avoid use of spin_until_future_complete whereever possible because I don't want my internal application logic coupled with the spinning/execution of my node. Maybe we'll get some API updates in a future release that makes this easier, especially with having to handle callback group objects explicitly.

I tried your code and also modified my code in this way. 25-90% of the service calls from a node or the command line tool are bad.
I'm using dashing, does this change anyting? How is it in eloquent or foxy?

I also did tests on eloquent and foxy now, but the results have been more bad.
But I found a fix which works for me. The fix is to also use MultiThreadedExecutor and add the client calling the service to a CallbackGroup. Adding the called service to a CallbackGroup if it don't call another is not needed I believe.
But thank you @jdlangs for pointing into the right direction for me.

Hi, I'm trying to apply this solution to my code, but I'm having some troubles. It seems all to work fine but after calling future.wait_for(3s) my node dies with the error: std::future_error: Broken promise. Any idea of how to solve it? Thanks!

Unfortunately I'm using C++.
But i assume, that the trick is to use MultiThreadedExecutor and CallbackGroups right?
Otherwise it will block when calling future.get() (future.done() in python).

I recently came across this issue. In ROS 1, services are clearly different from action as they are synchronous. Porting code from ROS 1 to 2 usually requires service calls to keep synchronous, or induces a change in the architecture.

This page shows how to get started with the Cloud Client Libraries for theGoogle Storage Transfer API. Read more about the clientlibraries for Cloud APIs, including the older Google API Client Libraries, inClient Libraries Explained.

To learn how to install and use the client library for Storage Transfer Service, see Storage Transfer Service client libraries. For more information, see the Storage Transfer Service C# API reference documentation.

Except as otherwise noted, the content of this page is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License, and code samples are licensed under the Apache 2.0 License. For details, see the Google Developers Site Policies. Java is a registered trademark of Oracle and/or its affiliates.

You can use the Service Client API to customize how your web application or website integrates with Workspace Web Edition. Genesys provides this API, which is based on window.postMessage, so that your application can access the Workspace Web Edition object model and bypass the cross-domain security limitations.

You can now set the interaction.web-content option to a list of option section names that correspond to web extension views. This means that you can configure Workspace to include more than one third-party web application, displayed as either a tab, a popup window, in the background at the interaction level, or hidden.

If you configure Workspace Web Edition to display your web application in a new tab in the Workspace user interface (as described in Enabling integration of web applications in the agent interface), then the service API only gives access to the dial operation.

The Service Client API involves two parties inside the agent's web browser: the service (the main web page) and the client (in an iframe on the same web page as the service). In order for the client web page to access the API, you need to set a few configuration options to work around web browser security restrictions for cross-origin requests and to enable request limits. You set these options on the WWEWS Cluster application only at the Application level; you can't set these options at the Agent or Agent Group level. Check out the Service Client API topic in the Workspace Web Edition Configuration Guide for a full list of the options available to configure the API.