I don't think the Fan Fiction stream needs too many gimmicks to gain
acceptance because you are doing something here that isn't being done
elsewhere.
There could be those who might say - and I'm playing Devil's Advocate
here - that you are hijacking something to your website that should
remain open. There's a precedent - I used TrekUnited pretty heavily
and will probably continue to do so for some subjects. I used the
StarTrekPaperModels Yahoo Group for Paper Models and in 2007 the
Gaming stream was on Hailing Frequencies Open.
I think the onus should be on the event and NOT who does what. Give
hosting privelidges to whoever fields the best bid at the start of the
year in the same way that they decide the Olympics or the WorldCon.
Just taking the fan fiction stream, if in future years a dozen small
fan fiction publishing groups have sprung up - and part of our purpose
is to encourage newcomers - then the hosting could be shared or
rotated or something else worked out that is beneficial to all.
Besides, what's the alternative? To build up The Twelve Trek Days as
some uber-group with its own forums and message lists? When I asked
for advice on the Conventioning list <
http://conventio.ning.com/forum/
topics/online-convention> and Fanboy replied, "One of the biggest
obstacles I see is that you're trying to build up an online community,
have it be active for 12 days, and then shut it off for the next 11
1/2 months. That's going to have trouble competing with a message
board that's up and running year-round."
To which I answered, "The target audience is the Trek fan production
community and Trek fandom in general. To generalise my experience from
the past two years I've found that individuals and smaller, newer
groups were interested in what we were doing because we represented a
wider audience than was dropping onto their sites. The larger groups
and individuals though were politely stand-offish for the most part."
"One of the things I've had to battle has been the perception that The
Twelve trek Days represents competition for their website's hit-count
when in fact , ideally we try to funnel users to the creators
websites. A perfect example was the 2007 Trek paper model and Gaming
days where we had a website that had a general webpage with links to
the host pages. In effect our website is less of a host than a
publicity organ for the different contributors."
"The exceptions were the events that represented *groups* of small
independant contributors like the 2008 eBook day and Music Video day.
In the case of the former I organised the labour involved in creating
the eBooks under the umbrella of TrekUnited publishing (this year Ad
Astra will be the host) which were made available on Issuu for free.
Similarly all the Music Videos were mirrored on our website using the
YouTube embedded viewer. The individual authors were happy to be
published electronically as were, presumably, the MV creators because
there was heavy emphasis on the creators homesite and other works."
I think the aim should be to make the event an enjoyable and
fulfilling experience for *groups* as well as individuals. How can we
expect groups to participate in the event if it is of no practical use
to them and their members? Ad Astra and TrekUnited do not exist for
The Twelve Days of Xmas, they have their own projects, goals and
aspirations.
I think it's perfectly ok to use the hosting of the event as a
drawcard to get groups to host events. I want people to turn around in
2010 and say, "Remember the Fan Fic publishing that Ad Astra did for
that Christmas Trek thingie last year? That was outstanding! I didn't
realise fans could do something like that!" I'd like to say to
prospective groups in 2010, "You get out of it what you put into it!
Ad Astra would never have got mentioned in the NY Times if they hadn't
grabbed the ball and run with it!"
You never mentioned rating of submissions - like we discussed I think
you should open it up to adult ratings this year as long as you use
industry standard labeling.
Go for it guys!
K