Simple explicitly typed method call

[Andrea Peruffo]

Hi there,

first of all really thanks for the work that save me a lot of time in generating code ;-)

I'm trying to obtain something like:

Class.method(x: Int)

Unfortunately the only two way to construct the desired syntax I found close to my problem doesn't fit:

REF("Class") DOT("method") APPLY(PARAM("x", IntClass))

Class.method(val x: Int)

and

REF("Class") DOT("method") APPLY(REF("x") withType(IntClass))

Class.method((x: Int))

Any way to get the job done?

Thanks in advance.

Andrea

[eugene yokota]

Glad you like treehugger!

What's wrong with Class.method((x: Int))?

You want to eliminate the extra paren or does it actually cause semantic difference?

-eugene

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "treehugger-scala" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to treehugger-sca...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to treehugg...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/treehugger-scala/a37aca88-3dd0-48d1-9e4b-e94282daa462%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[Andrea Peruffo]

exactly, and, in some cases to have a default param...

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "treehugger-scala" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/treehugger-scala/Yo8acK6wTV8/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to treehugger-sca...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to treehugg...@googlegroups.com.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/treehugger-scala/CA%2BCq6KRhMokSo3OSKpjKPfKiJw1sWfwD95fXqDRGtJjiiK8eFw%40mail.gmail.com.

[eugene yokota]

ok. but don't they mean the same thing in this case though?

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/treehugger-scala/CA%2BD48HRO_sF4aku1kH7vaBjLjnwey%2B%3DGH-b2aMGJuCGj1Zjohg%40mail.gmail.com.

[Andrea Peruffo]

err... ok, I'm working on generating a play "routes" file, 

also I will like to have a very clean syntax.

[eugene yokota]

Eliminating parens is easy, but I have to make sure that any other trees that use this won't break.

For instance someone could be generating something like:

    (x: Int) + _

Now it might turn into 

    x: Int + _

From pretty printer's point of view Typed is just Typed right now.

https://github.com/eed3si9n/treehugger/blob/v0.4.1/library/src/main/scala/treehugger/TreePrinters.scala#L534-L535

I'm up for making special cases to make things look prettier, but some compromises need to be made since we are generating Tree first.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/treehugger-scala/eb3b2f29-bdca-47a7-81ce-9b0a04466b81%40googlegroups.com.

[Andrea Peruffo]

Is it possible to provide a modified pretty printer ad hoc to ```treeToString``` method(implicit parameter i.e.)?

b.t.w. 

really prompt answers, thanks a lot!

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/treehugger-scala/CA%2BCq6KSe5s69iw9Xnx1DcocFAdoayq98Qg2xHt2KzzsK2CZ2sA%40mail.gmail.com.

[Andrea Peruffo]

I realised that the custom injectable TreePrinter will solve all of my problems.

I have made a demo of what needed here:

https://github.com/andreaTP/treehugger

This is completely retro-compatible, if you agree I can PR it...

Thanks in advance.

Andrea