I think the real question is how you see medication. If you see it as
a tool then all the conditions that apply to any tool must apply to
it. Are you using it at a time, to a degree, and under circumstances
that allow it to be beneficial. As a tool it helps some people.
Absolutely no question. It also hurts some people. Absolutely no
question. And for some it is simply irrelevant. Absolutely no
question. Like any tool it is a hypothesis. I think this might help
based on these factors. If the hypothesis sucks the use of
medications sucks. There are a million anecdotes that prove the truth
of every position on medication. I think you look at possible gains
and possible risks and the likelihood of either being real. Caution
is the best watch word. There is ample evidence that risks are
extremely real. Benefits seem real but very iffy to me. It is also
very important to know how the person taking the medication makes
sense of it. There is a big difference between someone taking it as a
tool to be checked out and someone coerced or manipulated to take it
because someone else thinks medication reflects the reality of who he
it and what his life is about. Medication as a claim of truth is
wrong and poisonous. Medication without the informed choice to say no
is wrong. I think too as it is frequently used it results in us
blamiing the victim of trauma and a very hard life for being hard to
be around and put up with. With medication as a tool the recovery
model is possible. With medication as truth (medical or otherwise) it
is not. Just my thoughts.