[Blog/Commentary] [USA] Ashley “I’m Colonized” Love

[Stephanie Stevens]

Ehipassiko, USA


Ashley “I’m Colonized” Love

Posted by Cristan on May 9, 2012


For example, this Spring a few self-promoting and
self-aggrandizing “transgender” bloggers, authors and “gender outlaw”
entertainers (who actually financially and professionally profit by
enforcing transgender socio-politics and umbrella-ism theory) are
obsessing over how to stop the inevitable transsexual liberation by
creating petty drama, speculating, concocting ‘out of this world’ and
laughable history revisionism, taking actions and quotes out of
context, presuming to know one’s intentions as if they are telepathic,
unrobing and degrading the bodies of women born with transsexualism
and behaving like unstable, over compulsive and anti-social
pesonalites, fueled by their amazing male egos and desire to get
attention, although it’s negative attention. Their desperate behavior
is obviously a backlash to the realization that their fantasy
“transgender umbrella reservation” mandate is coming to an end. They
are dealing with their ‘bubble being popped’ like most imperialists do
when their colonies breaks free: Retaliating with [mental] violence,
back tracking, faking evidence and agreements, mispspesking for
deseased transsexuals & others, and transparent [and failed] character
assassinations against numerous women of transsexual history that are
being seriously listened to. Their over the top cyber bullying is very
telling in how they lack genuine facts to back up their opinion based
frame work, as well as not having authentic or sincere intentions,
just the typical crafty lies most politicians spit when they want to
CON-vince the people of something they know dang well is *hog wash*.
- Ashley “I hate citing evidence” Love
<http://www.transformingmedia.blogspot.com/2012/05/transsexual-spring-tides-shifting-this.html>
, May 6, 2012

… And this is why the TS Separatist movement – as it has existed over
the past 5 years – is dead. Love has just proven my point. Did I not
say that Separatists have lost their historical narrative – the very
centerpiece of their argument – and has thus been reduced to the trans
equivalent of fringe conspiracy folks (like birthers
<http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthers/birthcertificate.asp> )
or the young earth creationists who believe what they believe because
their belief tells them to believe? Did I not predict that Love would
have this EXACT response? About a month ago I predicted the following
behavior from Love:

Deny! Deny! Deny! I-CAN’T-HEAR-YOU! LALALALALALA! Some will simply
pretend that the truth is not the truth (I predict Ashley Love will
take this course) and/or that any/all evidence which disproves their
narrative will be asserted to have been faked. Therefore, evidence
disproving the narrative will magically become evidence supporting the
idea of a conspiracy against transsexual identity.
- Me <http://www.cristanwilliams.com/b/2012/04/01/im-calling-it-the-death-of-the-ts-separatists-movement/>
, just a little more than month ago

Let’s not forget that Love is aware that her narrative doesn’t align
with reality <http://www.cristanwilliams.com/b/2012/04/12/pick-a-side-fantasy-or-reality/>
. She’s apparently happy to try to convince you that transsexual
history isn’t real. For her, the actual historical record should be
hidden and regarded as being suspect because Love needs YOU to turn
YOUR back on reality to support HER in HER belief that she’s been
wronged and moreover, that she’s a heroic leader in some imagined epic
crusade she believes herself to be fighting.

The reason the TS Separatist movement – as it has existed over the
past 5 years – is dead is because the cat is out of the bag. The
fictional history Separatists have propagated has been exposed and
furthermore, it’s been noted by those who write the history books.
That can’t be undone.

Love claims that non-Separatism ”lack[s] genuine facts to back up
their opinion…” Really? Because I’ve been through a lot of Love’s blog
and I can’t ever recall her making citations for her phantasmagorical
fact claims. Not only is she’s demonstrably wrong
<http://www.cristanwilliams.com/b/2012/04/27/fantacy-vs-reality-part-deux/>
about GLAAD’s position on the use of the term transgender, she’s
demonstrably wrong
<http://www.cristanwilliams.com/b/tracking-transgender-the-historical-truth/>
about her assertion that “transgender” came from Virginia Prince. The
reality is that today, “transgender” means what it meant in 1974. I
mean, I guess it’s possible that I’ve written and artificially aged
thousands of books from 1974 and have gotten google books to become
part of the TG Borg in our effort to “fake evidence.” Or, maybe I time
traveled so that while I was visiting the past, I forced and Drs. King
and Ekins to write on page 3 of their 2006 book, Transgender
Phenomenon:

There was talk that would take 20 years to become widespread: of
transsexuals seeking ‘gender alignment’; of ‘trans-gender’ and
‘trans.people’ [sic] used as umbrella terms to include both TVs and
TSs.

Or maybe Drs. King and Ekins were in on the conspiracy from the start!!!

[Photo <http://bit.ly/KpyN20> ]

Apparently when someone like myself points out that “transgender” has
been around for more than 20 years and that it’s been, in fact, used
in its modern sense since at least 1974, such perceived aspersions
constitute “mental violence” in Love’s reality. Yurp… It’s all part of
one big ol’ conspiracy that only Love and a few of her acolytes are
aware of. Furthermore, anyone who dares poke a hole in her conspiracy
theory has a male ego, is seeking negative attention, is desperate, an
imperialist and a colonist.

So, yah… that’s one version of reality.

Another version of reality might be that Love is mistaken about a
great number of things and needs YOU to reject reality so that she can
continue playing the part of the heroic victim.

Which is more likely?

MY CHALLENGE TO ASHLEY LOVE:

1. Produce objective evidence proving that Virginia Prince used
the word “transgender” in the 1960s or 70s.
2. Produce objective evidence proving that Virginia Prince used
the term “transgenderist” before 1978.
3. Produce the objective evidence which led Love to conclude that
the historical record has been faked.
4. Produce objective evidence proving that “transgender” wasn’t
used in its modern usage back in 1974.
5. Produce objective evidence proving that the term “transgender”
is only 20 years old instead of at least 42 years old.

I promise you… Love will NOT respond to the above challenge in any
rational way. She can’t; Love has nothing but fantasy to fall back on.
My guess is their she’ll either pretend that I’ve not made this
challenge or she’ll respond with yet more ad-hominem attacks. The
closest Love could hope to come in meeting my above challenge is to
simply quote someone else who is mistakenly asserting (without
evidence) that Prince coined the term transgender to refer to
crossdressers. She can’t respond with anything like a well-reasoned,
evidence-based, citation-heavy reply. The historical record just
doesn’t support the Virginia Prince fountainhead narrative. She is
unable to support any of the truth claims she’s made about the term
“transgender”.

I encourage rational people to consider that there is a truth to be
known about Love’s assertions. Either I’ve faked evidence (and have
apparently time traveled) in an effort to revise history to
misrepresent the transsexual experience because I have no real
evidence, have a male ego, am seeking negative attention, am
desperate, an imperialist and a colonist or maybe Love’s reality isn’t
congruent with the factual historical record.


http://www.cristanwilliams.com/b/2012/05/09/ashley-im-colonized-love/