[News] [DC, USA] Prostitution Proposal Sparks Debate
Stephanie Stevens
Prostitution Proposal Sparks Debate
Councilmember Alexander's bill to make prostitution-free zones
permanent draws both sides to heated hearing
by John Riley
Published on January 26, 2012, 6:48am
City Councilmembers Phil Mendelson (D-At Large) and Yvette Alexander
(D-Ward 7) presided over a contentious hearing of the Judiciary
Committee Tuesday that saw passionate testimony from both supporters
and opponents of a bill that would grant the chief of police the
ability to declare any public area a permanent ''prostitution-free
zone.''
The measure, introduced by Alexander and co-sponsored by six other
councilmembers, would allow the police chief to declare areas such as
the Eastern Avenue corridor in Ward 7, near the Prince George's County
border, such a zone. Under current law, the chief may declare an area
a prostitution-free zone, in which criminal penalties are increased
for prostitution, but for only 20 days at a time.
''We need to rid this ill from our community,'' Alexander said in
reference to prostitution, which she continually reiterated was an
illegal activity. ''It would not be accepted in any other ward in the
community, and it will not be accepted in my ward.''
Witnesses testifying in support of the measure, many of whom live in
Ward 7 or in nearby jurisdictions in Maryland, echoed Alexander's
concerns, saying they and their children have been exposed to ''lewd
and unlawful acts'' committed by prostitutes and their clients.
Metropolitan Police Department Assistant Police Chief Peter J. Newsham
testified that the purpose of such zones, as they currently exist, is
not to make arrests for prostitution, but to aid MPD officers in
ridding prostitution-related activities from a specific area for a
period of time.
In addition, Mendelson frequently reminded those testifying in favor
that prostitution-free zones already exist, and asked them to tailor
their remarks to why such zones should be made permanent.
Meanwhile, opponents of the bill, particularly in the transgender
community, said that the enforcement of the current prostitution-free
zones, as carried out by MPD officers, unfairly singles out
transgender individuals who are accused of engaging in sex work, even
if they are not.
Opponents of the bill also said the prostitution-free zones do nothing
to reduce prostitution, instead only moving it from one area of the
city to another. The District should deal with the underlying causes
of prostitution, they argued, namely hiring discrimination, high
unemployment and a lack of resources and support for sex workers.
Cyndee Clay, executive director of Helping Individual Prostitutes
Survive (HIPS), one of the District's chief organizations dealing with
sex workers, testified that HIPS originally received city money for
condom distribution and HIV-prevention programs, pre-trial diversion
programs for those arrested for prostitution, and counseling and
assistance programs for prostitutes who leave their pimps or are
victims of violence on the streets.
Clay told Metro Weekly that HIPS has lost more than $350,000 in
funding due to cuts in District programs that directly helped sex
workers.
Civil libertarians have issues with the bill as it exists as well.
Ariel Levinson-Waldman, senior counsel to D.C. Attorney General Irvin
B. Nathan, speaking on behalf of the attorney general's office, said
that while the administration supports the policy goal of the bill, it
has ''substantial concerns'' about the bill's current form related to
its constitutional soundness and practical utility.
Levinson-Waldman said that if the council chooses to go forward with
the legislation, the bill should be amended to include provisions to
prove intent to engage in prostitution, so as not to be found
unconstitutionally vague if the law is later challenged in the courts.
When Mendelson finished calling all witnesses and ended the hearing,
it was clear that those on opposite sides were not any closer to
seeing eye-to-eye.
''I see no difference between selling drugs and prostitution,'' said
Nakkiyah Gant, who recently moved to Ward 7 with her young children.
''It's an illegal act.''
Meanwhile, Alison Gardner, a local LGBT activist, said she feared the
council would ram through the legislation, despite its apparent flaws.
''It's kind of a steamroller,'' she said of the bill. ''It's the worst
example of politics, where serious issues like public health and
safety are turned into a political football or pawn to gain political
power. This is a train that left the station, driven by the leading
sponsors. They're taking a shortcut, P.R.-based approach to this.''
Copyright ©2012 · Jansi, LLC.