The destinations (and route numbers) reflected what happened to the
trams when they reached Balaclava Junction, so the 69 would have
continued straight on down Balaclava Road. In itself, this wasn't a
normal working. All the regular routes used the curves at the sides of
Balaclava Junction:
4D (East Malvern, Darling Road) the south east
64 (East Brighton) the south west (it went along Balaclava Road, not
Dandenong Road, in those days)
69 (Kew-Cotham Road to St Kilda Beach) the north west
67 (Caulfield - actually Balaclava Junction - to St Kilda
Beach) the north east. This went via Dandenong Road and was the haunt of
the CW5s. This was the route that you were thinking of.
All of the photos I posted were taken in the Caulfield station area.
David Walker
On 23-May-19 7:50 PM, Ronald Besdansky wrote:
> V good pics. Making me long for the days when Melbourne was all Ws (almost!)
>
> The photo ending in ...26 appears to show a car on the 69 to St Kilda
> turning right. I can't work out where that can be. IIRC, there was a
> service from Caulfield to St K but it didn't show 69.
>
> On Thu., 23 May 2019, 17:26 David Walker, <
dwa...@netspeed.com.au
> <mailto:
tramsdownunder%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com>
> > <mailto:
tramsdownunde...@googlegroups.com
> <mailto:
tramsdownunder%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com>>.
> > <mailto:
tramsdo...@googlegroups.com
> <mailto:
tramsdownunder%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com>.
>
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tramsdownunder/CACw%3DT3nssbCjzjmh3GcM35pgXdomMiOW8nR4EnBkFLZivA53Ng%40mail.gmail.com
> <
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tramsdownunder/CACw%3DT3nssbCjzjmh3GcM35pgXdomMiOW8nR4EnBkFLZivA53Ng%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.