Melbourne's tram network again fails to meet national accessibility standard

36 views
Skip to first unread message

Greg Sutherland

unread,
Nov 18, 2025, 11:50:14 PMNov 18
to TramsDownUnder


https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-11-19/melbourne-tram-network-falls-short-accessibility-standards/106027512

A woman with blue hair and rimless glasses in a floral brown cardigan stares off camera as a tram approaches on the road behind.

Terry Wesselink moved to Melbourne's north to be closer to public transport but the trams on her route often have steep steps.  (ABC News: Peter Drought)

In short:

Only 18 per cent of Melbourne's tram services are accessible for commuters with mobility restrictions, according to Victoria's Auditor-General.

The follow-up report found those commuters often have to wait up to half an hour longer for trams with lower floors.

The investigation found the Department of Transport and Planning has not set any targets or directed funding to improve the tram network.

Melbourne's tram network is falling short of national accessibility standards, with a new report finding there has been "little improvement" in the past five years.

About 18 per cent of Melbourne's tram services were accessible in 2023-24 — where low-floor trams met level-access platforms — according to the Victorian Auditor-General's Office (VAGO).

The number of trams with low floors had risen by just 3 per cent since the previous assessment five years ago, while stops with level platforms increased from 27 to 29 per cent.

"The department's delivery of level-access stops has slowed since our 2020 audit," the report found.

Melbourne has the world's largest tram network, with over 480 trams and 1,628 stops.

But people with mobility restrictions often wait up to half an hour longer for trams with lower floors than other commuters, the report found.

The state government received 10 recommendations in the wake of the initial review.

The Auditor-General found only five had been completed.

"We also assessed if the department's actions addressed our 2020 audit recommendations. We found that most of them did not,"
the report said.

The report found the Department of Transport and Planning had sought legal advice about its failure to meet accessibility targets.

It also confirmed the department had produced several plans and strategies with a focus on accessibility since the pandemic. However, they failed to include targets, time frames or funding allocations.

A Route 16 tram with accessible low floors pulls up to an accessible Super Stop platform in Melbourne

Only 21 per cent of Melbourne's tram services have low floors and run through level-access platforms. (ABC News Breakfast)

Disability advocates call out 'neglect'

Terry Wesselink moved to Melbourne's north to be closer to public transport four years ago.

The 60-year-old has a connective tissue disorder — which has caused pain for most of her life — and uses a mobility walker to get around.

"I can only walk about 300 metres before I absolutely have to stop," she said.

Ms Wesselink said her closest tram line — the Route 19 — doesn't have many level platforms and often has trams with steps to get on board.

"Those really steep steps are impossible,"
she said.

"I've been travelling with my husband. He's got off the tram, and the doors have closed and taken off without me having the chance to get off."

A woman with blue hair, glasses, a floral brown cardigan and orange pants sits on a mobility aid beside a city road,

Terry Wesselink says she often has to drive four kilometres to catch a tram because she cannot get on one at her nearest stop on Sydney Road in Brunswick. (ABC News: Peter Drought)

About one in five Victorians have a disability, according to the Department of Families, Fairness and Housing.

Ms Wesselink said she will often drive up to four kilometres to the next accessible tram stop, instead of using her closest at Sydney Road in Brunswick.

"I really think they can do better. I think it's neglect."

"I am not valued as a human being because my needs are not being taken into account."

Failing to meet targets

The Howard Government passed laws for accessible public transport in 2002, which tram platforms were required to meet three years ago.

"The department did not meet the 2022 deadline for tram stop compliance," the VAGO report said.

"On current plans, the department will also miss the 2032 compliance deadline for low-floor trams."

Victorian Greens MP Katherine Copsey said the lack of progress was "shameful."

"We have had decades and made such little progress. The government really needs to prioritise this with funding," she said.

Premier Jacinta Allan said her government had made investments to make public transport more accessible, including on new the Metro Tunnel.

"Our public transport system needs to be as accessible as it can be, particularly for people with a disability," she said.

But disability advocates like Ms Wesselink said more support is needed to help bridge the gaps between modern and legacy infrastructure.

"Level tram stops don't have great ribbon cutting opportunities. It's a hidden, quiet, normal thing that we need to do," she said.

Posted , updated 



Robert Smith

unread,
Nov 19, 2025, 6:06:40 PM (14 days ago) Nov 19
to TramsDownUnder
The updated report on the progress from the 2020 Auditor Generals report


Robert

TP

unread,
Nov 20, 2025, 5:07:08 AM (13 days ago) Nov 20
to TramsDownUnder
Thank you. It's a failure of government rather than a failure of the tramways. 

I was intrigued by this as it didn't have an explanation, unless I missed something:

" While all of Melbourne's low-floor tram fleet offers level-access boarding and can be considered broadly accessible for people with mobility restrictions, the existing low-floor C Class, D Class and E Class trams do not fully comply with all relevant DSAPT standards. Next Generation Trams will be Melbourne’s first fully DSAPT-compliant tram model. "

Often this boils down to platform gaps and/or mobility assistance features inside the vehicle. All trams built since the 2002 DDA regulations (D and E class) should be compliant, so it mystifies me why the E class in particular is considered non-compliant and what has been done in the G class that makes it fully compliant by comparison?

Tony P

Robert Smith

unread,
Nov 20, 2025, 7:21:42 AM (13 days ago) Nov 20
to tramsdo...@googlegroups.com
Hi Tony,
One I think that the government dropping the ball on DSAPT is to do with them not being able to have a big opening and photo opportunity opening tramp stops. As for the E class being in a wheelchair at times myself I would say the issue is to do with the ramp up into them from the platform. We also must not forget that train stations also came under this legislation and nothing has been done for the legacy stations.
Robert. 


From: 'TP' via TramsDownUnder <tramsdo...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2025 9:07:08 PM
To: TramsDownUnder <tramsdo...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [TramsDownUnder] Re: Melbourne's tram network again fails to meet national accessibility standard
 
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "TramsDownUnder" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/tramsdownunder/dl6dnv5OSCk/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to tramsdownunde...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tramsdownunder/67cb16d2-5196-4066-a515-5e0b19a11de3n%40googlegroups.com.

TP

unread,
Nov 20, 2025, 7:51:33 AM (13 days ago) Nov 20
to TramsDownUnder
Thank you Robert. So it sounds like there is a vertical clearance issue between the platform and the door threshold. In other words, a design error in either the platform or the tram or both. Can you get the wheelchair in and out unassisted and if so, does it involve a bit of a heave to climb the gap? The Ds too should have been compliant if they were ordered after 2002. 

Tony P

Robert Smith

unread,
Nov 20, 2025, 8:10:13 AM (13 days ago) Nov 20
to tramsdo...@googlegroups.com
Tony,
I have an electric wheelchair so it is fine though getting out if the stop is crowded is a bit of a effort as I need some rule room to roll out without hitting people. The teas were probably ordered before the Australian specifications were finalised. I also have issues with getting onto C class at the nearest accessible stop as it was built to the old specifications and if either the driver doesn’t pull out the bridging plate or the bridge plate isn’t working.
Robert
From: 'TP' via TramsDownUnder <tramsdo...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2025 11:51:33 PM
To: TramsDownUnder <tramsdo...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [TramsDownUnder] Re: Melbourne's tram network again fails to meet national accessibility standard
 

TP

unread,
Nov 20, 2025, 10:16:22 PM (12 days ago) Nov 20
to TramsDownUnder
Thank you again. I can't understand how they could have got it wrong with the Es. By the 2010s they should have been well-grounded on design compliance for unassisted accessibility.

Once when I was about to board a train in Perth, a bloke in a motorised wheelchair roared past me at full bore and onto the train without even a moment's hesitation at the interface! Such confidence in Transperth getting it right. 

On Sydney trams we've partly gone backwards, with the Inner West Light Rail and its Variotrams being originally fully compliant with the pre 2002 requirements, then new "off the shelf" CAFs and a downgrade to assisted (ramp) boarding, then CSELR gets it right, fully unassisted from the outset, then they deploy Citadis on IWLR and it's back to assisted boarding on that line. Buses, ferries (sometimes depending on tide) and the metro are unassisted boarding, while Sydney and all NSW trains are going to have to be permanently assisted boarding due to the hundreds of varying platform heights and gaps, thanks to the original NSW Railways adopting the British eccentricity of preferring to build stations on curves. Assisted boarding is of course conditionally compliant only on the proviso that there is staff present to assist.

Tony P
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages