B 39;z Invisible One

[Courtland Boland]

Ineed to make removable back panel for kitchen island that electrician can have access to fan (cook top and lit up fan will be installed in island)

Any idea what I can use for invisible panel clips? I was thinking to use magnets.

Any suggestions will help

Thanks

View higher quality, full size image (3264 X 2448)

5/8/15 #2: invisible panel clips ...

james mcgrew Member

I would consider a) french cleat B) z clip or C) the Star hanger. all would need 3/8 to 1/2 riseStarHanger5/8/15 #3: invisible panel clips ...

chris

Website:

Lamello Tenso P-14s could work in this application. They're designed to be used with adhesive as a clamping element, but I've used them for valances, scribes, etc. The panel could be popped on directly from the outside. I think if you kept the first connector kind of far up from the bottom edge of the panel, you'd have enough purchase to pull it off from there. They clamp with about 35lbs. of pressure.Lamello5/8/15 #4: invisible panel clips ...

james mcgrew Member

Website:

Chris, will the Lamello allow for periodic removal for maintenance ?On another note can you email me my wonderful Hoffman lasted a good 12+ years and needs a motor switch ?5/8/15 #5: invisible panel clips ...

Bob Member

Thanks

French cleat won't work . This is full size gable and don't have any Clarence

Same for lamelo . It looks that is not removable5/8/15 #6: invisible panel clips ...

james mcgrew Member

I use magnets often on lots of things,, may work but over a long time you may need to have a support to keep them from sagging and replace them in some years,with a 3/8" clearance it cannot be planed as a reveal,, it has to function ?5/8/15 #7: invisible panel clips ...

chris

Website:

Haha, wrong "Hoffman", I don't have anything to do with their machines. I did see a "Hofmann" shaper (spelled the "right" way) the other day in another shop. Guy said it's basically the best shaper in the world - I'd never heard of 'em (maybe they're distant cousins of mine...)Anyway, yes the panel could be removed. I would replace the elements with fresh ones when you put the panel back on though. Like I said, they're designed to be used as clamping elements with glue and the plastic will develop a memory in the clipped (open) position over time. Doesn't matter once the glue has set of course. Can be used in apps like scribes or valances without glue, and in this panel scenario. So, when the panel comes off (which I imagine isn't going to happen very much), just slide out the first set of connectors and slide in new ones. Takes about 2 seconds.5/8/15 #8: invisible panel clips ...

chris

Website:

Put in the wrong website last time....5/8/15 #9: invisible panel clips ...

Bob Member

I was thinking about using magnets on for corners and to protect from sagging drill and insert 4 pins in corners5/10/15 #10: invisible panel clips ...

Bill

Look at keku clips from hafele.5/11/15 #11: invisible panel clips ...

antss

Bill beat me to it, but KEKU is what you need.They're used all the time in Germany to do what you are describing.Cheap, and no special tooling required !5/17/15 #12: invisible panel clips ...

Wyatt

I haven't ever used this product from Sugatsune but it might work for your application if you haven't already found a solution.Sugatsune7/14/15 #13: invisible panel clips ...

Charles Porter

Website:

Bob

Star Hanger Systems makes an insert fastener called the Blue Zero that receives a steel screw.

Panels can be pushed straight into place with zero reveal required. The inserts fit into a 1" hole. They take about 10 pounds to push on, and about 25 pound to pull off. They are make for repeated use.

Post a Response

Notify me of responses to this thread

Subscribe to email updates on this Forum

To receive email notification of additions to this forum thread,

enter your name and email address, and then click the

"Keep Me Posted" button below.

Please Note: If you have posted a message or response,

do not submit this request ... you are already signed up

to receive notification!

Your Name: E-Mail Address: Enter the correct numbers into the field below: Date of your Birth:

One of the great unexplained mysteries is the nature of dark matter. So far, its existence has only been established through gravitational effects observed in space; no dark-matter particles with the needed properties have (yet) been detected. Could the Higgs boson be the key to their discovery?

Figure 1 shows the diphoton invariant-mass spectrum in the most sensitive event category, comparing the data with the fitted number of expected signal and background events. The data has a small mass peak at around 125 GeV that is fully consistent with a fluctuation of the Standard Model background.

ATLAS physicists considered different production mechanisms of the Higgs boson to search for such events in different event topologies; to increase the overall sensitivity, these searches can be statistically combined. Such a combination was conducted by ATLAS in 2019 with partial Run 2 data, resulting in an upper limit of 26% (17% expected) on the Higgs-to-invisible decay probability (branching fraction).

ATLAS researchers then went one step further, combining their analysis of the full Run 2 dataset with a similar Higgs-to-invisible analysis using the full Run 1 dataset, which examined the Higgs-boson production via vector-boson fusion and its associated production with a W or Z boson. Their final result found no evidence for invisible particles, and thus physicists set a new upper limit of 11% (11% expected) on the Higgs-to-invisible branching fraction, at a 95% confidence level. This is the strongest direct limit on this process up to date.

The new results from the ATLAS Collaboration set strong constraints on many dark-matter models, making important progress in the ongoing search for new physics. In the future, ATLAS physicists will further improve the discovery potential of using the Higgs boson as a tool to search for dark matter and other new physics phenomena.

The advantage of this two step method, is that all the plotting can beparralelised, each element can be customised by the user if necessary andadditional elements can also be added to the plot by just adding a new row.

Now we need to set the sizes.From align() we will get the maximum width and depth.There is one plotted row for each row of the returned matrices.The number of columns of the matrices is the max width of the Pedigree,so there are unused positions in shorter rows, these can be identifedby having an nid value of 0.Horizontal locations for each point go from 0 to xmax, subjects are atleast 1 unit apart; a large number will be exactly one unit part.These locations will be at the top center of each plotted symbol.

We would like to to make the boxes about 2.5 characters wide, which matchesmost labels, but no more than 0.9 units wide or .5 units high.

We also want to vertical room for the labels.This is done by the set_plot_area() function.We should have at least 1/2 of stemp2 space above and stemp2 space below.

The stemp3 variable is the height of labels: users may use multi-line ones.Our constraints then are

Sometimes a Pedigree is too large to fit comfortably on one page.The \(subregion\) argument allows one to plot only a portion of thePedigree based on the plot region. Along with other tools toselect portions of the Pedigree based on relatedness, such as allthe descendents of a particular marriage, it gives a tool foraddressing this. This breaks our original goal of completelyautomatic plots, but users keep asking for more.

The argument is \(subregion = c(min x, max x, min depth, max depth)\),and works by editing away portions of the \(plist\) objectreturned by align. First decide what lines to keep.Then take subjects away from each line, update spouses and twins,and fix up parentage for the line below.

The number of division will depend on the number of affection register in the\(fill\) slot of the \(scale\) slot of the Pedigree.The filling will depend on the color given by the corresponding modality foreach individual, it is the same for the border of the polygon.

First there are lines up from each child, which would be trivial except fortwins, triplets, etc.Then we draw the horizontal bar across siblings and finally the connector fromthe parent. For twins, the vertical lines are angled towards acommon point, the variable is called \(target\) below.The horizontal part is easier if we do things family byfamily. The plist$twins variable is 1/2/3 for a twin on my right,0 otherwise.

The last set of lines are dotted arcs that connect mulitiple instances ofa subject on the same line. These instances may or may not be on thesame line.The arrcconect function draws a quadratic arc between locations \((x1, y1)\)and \((x2, y2\)) whose height is 1/2 unit above a straight line connection.

There are four sumbols corresponding to the four sex codes: square = male,circle = female, diamond= unknown, and triangle = terminated.

They are shaded according to the value(s) of affected status for eachsubject, and filling uses the standardarguments of the \(polygon()\) function.The complexity is when multiple affected status are given, in which case thesymbol will be divided up into sections, clockwise starting at thelower left.I asked Beth about this (original author) and there was no particularreason to start at 6 o-clock, but it is now established as history.

The first part of the code is to create the collection of polygons thatwill make up the symbol. These are then used again and again.The collection is kept as a list with the four elements square, circle,diamond and triangle.

The circle function is quite simple. The number of segments is arbitrary,50 seems to be enough to make the eye happy. We draw the ray from 0 tothe edge, then a portion of the arc. The polygon function will connectback to the center.

3a8082e126