Justification for a Federal Injunction to suspend all vaccine licenses based on unreasonable health risks and causal links to chronic disease pandemics (2009)
Harold Saive
Justification for a Federal Injunction to suspend all vaccine licenses based on unreasonable health risks and causal links to chronic disease pandemics (2009)
https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.548.7497&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Kent R. Holcomb, #91014
Medical Legal Advocate A.S.P.C. Tucson Unit Manzanita P.O. Box
24401 Tucson, AZ 85734
Abstract
Saluting our unsung independent research heroes, this prototype
action plan posits that the quality and quantity of new
independent research now
warrants a U.S. Federal District Court injunction order that
suspends the licenses of all vaccines listed on the National
Vaccine Program’s (NVP) and
Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) schedule, as the Federal
District Court is a normally unbiased judicial court, unlike the
National Vaccine Injury
Compensation Program (NVICP) or Secretary of Health and Human
Services (SHHS) forums that appear tainted.
Viewed through a Civil Suit “42 USC § 300aa-31” lens with its
“more likely than not” evidentiary burden and its Daubert, infra,
prohibition
against expert opinion reliance upon poor quality and flawed data,
the surviving good quality data shows the SHHS was statutorily
required to
suspend the National Vaccine Program (NVP) since it “more likely
than not” caused numerous neurological and immune system pandemics
(e.g.,
autism, neurological disorders, autoimmune disorders, etc). Since
the SHHS knew of this linking data and intentionally exposed the
public to these
serous risks of harm, while attempting to hide/alter the data that
showed the harm, the SHHS also violated the 14th Amendment’s
“Constitutional
Safety Guarantees.” Under these egregious and horrifying
circumstances, both Sec. 300aa-31 and a 28 USC § 1331 “Bivens
Action” would authorize
injunctive relief, and where warranted damages. (Ref. 34)
Unlike the formerly attempted Congressional, IOM, FDA, CDC and
U.S. Federal Claims Court forums, the § 300aa-31 and “Bivens
Action
Court” processes ban all flawed data, accept high quality
biological data over poor quality epidemiological data, and place
all quality evidence of
harm before a hopefully unbiased Federal Judge who is not
influenced by politics or the pharmaceutical industry. Most
importantly, these Judges
have the authority to remedy the problem and are accustomed to
restraining the conduct of Federal Executive/Legislative branch
agencies that
jeopardize the public safety rights. Here quality data triumphs
over politics, as these Courts routinely protect our federal civil
rights.
The NVP is an umbrella for the vaccination activities of the
Centers for Disease Control (CDC), National Institute of Health
(NIH), Advisory
Committee for Immunization Practice (ACIP) and the Food and Drug
Agency (FDA) among others.
© Copyright 2009, Medical Veritas International Inc. All rights
reserved.
Keywords: 42 USC § 300aa-31, QER/EBM, NVP/NVICP, pandemic, autism
See TOWN SQUARE NEWS Updates: https://groups.google.com/g/town-square-news
