Firearms and Vaccines are "INHERENTLY UNSAFE"
Harold Saive
FIRING SQUAD: Firearms and Vaccines are "INHERENTLY UNSAFE"
Ref: SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
RUSSELL BRUESEWITZ, et al ., PETITIONERS v. WYETH LLC, fka
WYETH, INC., fka WYETH LABORATORIES, et al. on writ of
certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the third
circuit [February 22, 2011]
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/09-152.ZD.html
Similar to a firearm barrel, the syringe needle is
a hollow metal tube attached to a delivery system where a
potentially life-threatening payload is delivered to the human
body as a "shot".
A shot in the arm by either a firearm or vaccine can result in death as
the shock and/or physical damage to an artery from either
unnatural intrusion into the body can travel beyond the arm to
cause physical damage or death to internal organs including the
brain.
While intent to cause harm with a firearm is usually judged as a
felony, the intent or complicity to cause harm from a syringe
shot of an known or suspected toxic substances is regarded as a
risk of death and injury for an alleged "greater good where we
allow the state to assign the blame to the victim of the crime
even if they were mandated to be shot to death by the state.
Supreme Court Justice Sotomeyor's dissenting opinion in the 2011
"Bruesewitz v. Wyeth" case provides what should have been
the majority opinion because the ruling (1) disregarded the
intent of congress, (2) failed to mandate responsibility of
manufacturers to make safer products and (3) provided no method
or policy to effectively compensate victims of vaccine deaths or
injuries.
Justice Sotomeyor Except:
"The Court imposes its own bare policy
preference over the considered judgment of Congress. In
doing so, the Court excises 13 words from the statutory
text, misconstrues the Act’s legislative history, and
disturbs the careful balance Congress struck between
compensating vaccine-injured children and stabilizing the
childhood vaccine market."
"Its decision leaves a regulatory vacuum in
which no one ensures that vaccine manufacturers adequately
take account of scientific and technological advancements
when designing or distributing their products. Because
nothing in the text, structure, or legislative history of
the Vaccine Act remotely suggests that Congress intended
such a result, I respectfully dissent."
So, Next time someone offers you and your
family a "shot" through a syringe barrel beware the final result
may not be much different than the aftermath of a mass school
shooting.
________________________________________________
Subscribe to NewsParadigm Substack: https://NewsParadigm.substack.com
