Strange behaveour of Tortoise SVN Status cache

105 views
Skip to first unread message

Peter Melvyn

unread,
Jul 1, 2008, 8:41:58 AM7/1/08
to us...@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Hi all,

I'm on fresh Vista Ultimate installation and I noticed that %subj%
drains one CPU's core at 100 % continuosly since time I've opened
Windows Explorer and focused a folder on C: disk. If I focus folder
containing valid SVN working space, the cache stops draining CPU and
if I select another arbitrary folder C: or D: disk, it drains it
again.

In the past, I have a similiar problems with all versions after 1.4.5
(10425) and on the top of it, Windows Explorer time-to-time has
deadlocked e.g if I opened a folder. Restart of machine did not help.
An attempt to open the same folder ended with deadlock as well.

If I unistalled such version and install back 1.4.5 (10425),
everything worked smoothly each time.

###

Does anobody has a similiar experiences?


Thanks, Peter

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-un...@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users...@tortoisesvn.tigris.org

Stefan Küng

unread,
Jul 1, 2008, 2:57:17 PM7/1/08
to us...@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Peter Melvyn wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm on fresh Vista Ultimate installation and I noticed that %subj%
> drains one CPU's core at 100 % continuosly since time I've opened
> Windows Explorer and focused a folder on C: disk. If I focus folder
> containing valid SVN working space, the cache stops draining CPU and
> if I select another arbitrary folder C: or D: disk, it drains it
> again.
>
> In the past, I have a similiar problems with all versions after 1.4.5
> (10425) and on the top of it, Windows Explorer time-to-time has
> deadlocked e.g if I opened a folder. Restart of machine did not help.
> An attempt to open the same folder ended with deadlock as well.
>
> If I unistalled such version and install back 1.4.5 (10425),
> everything worked smoothly each time.
>
> ###
>
> Does anobody has a similiar experiences?

Please try the build from http://nightlybuilds.tortoisesvn.net/1.5.x/
and check whether the issue is solved.

Stefan

--
___
oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile"
(_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN
\ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
/_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.net

signature.asc

Peter Melvyn

unread,
Jul 2, 2008, 5:02:03 AM7/2/08
to us...@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
On 1 Čec, 20:57, Stefan Küng <tortoise...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Please try the build fromhttp://nightlybuilds.tortoisesvn.net/1.5.x/


> and check whether the issue is solved.

Hi Stefan,

I've reinstalled TortoiseSVN by build 13390. If I opened Windows
Explorer and
select C: disk first time, I got error dialog with

"Unhandled Win32 exception in TSVNCache.exe [1708]".

but SVN cache itself keeps running and it seems it works (at least it
consumes
some CPU time and Client seems to work correctly). I will keep using
this build to
verify functionality...

###

In the change log I read a record concerning bugfix of SVN cache if
work space is in the root. But this is not the case.
FYI, each of my disks constain some folders
having "dotted" names, e.g. on my C: disk it is:
._
.0
.SVNBOX // this is a local SVN repository
.VPCBOX // this is a shared disk with Virtual PC
.WKS-PM // this is my workspace
Boot
Document and settings
...

Stefan Küng

unread,
Jul 2, 2008, 3:15:15 PM7/2/08
to us...@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Peter Melvyn wrote:
> On 1 Čec, 20:57, Stefan Küng <tortoise...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Please try the build fromhttp://nightlybuilds.tortoisesvn.net/1.5.x/
>> and check whether the issue is solved.
>
> Hi Stefan,
>
> I've reinstalled TortoiseSVN by build 13390. If I opened Windows
> Explorer and
> select C: disk first time, I got error dialog with
>
> "Unhandled Win32 exception in TSVNCache.exe [1708]".

Please try the next nightly build.

signature.asc

Peter Melvyn

unread,
Jul 3, 2008, 4:17:14 AM7/3/08
to us...@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
On Jul 2, 9:15 pm, Stefan Küng <tortoise...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > I've  reinstalled TortoiseSVN by build 13390. If I opened Windows
> > Explorer and
> > select C: disk first time, I got error dialog with
> >     "Unhandled Win32 exception in TSVNCache.exe [1708]".

> Please try the next nightly build.

I tried reinstall it with build 13403 and I got an error before
installation process has been finished:

An error occured during installation of assembly
component
{241560EA-12B7-37C4-9724-DE33E7FE7BB7}
HRESULT: 0x8007041D

Stefan Küng

unread,
Jul 3, 2008, 4:27:49 AM7/3/08
to us...@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Peter Melvyn wrote:
> On Jul 2, 9:15 pm, Stefan Küng <tortoise...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> I've reinstalled TortoiseSVN by build 13390. If I opened Windows
>>> Explorer and
>>> select C: disk first time, I got error dialog with
>>> "Unhandled Win32 exception in TSVNCache.exe [1708]".
>
>> Please try the next nightly build.
>
> I tried reinstall it with build 13403 and I got an error before
> installation process has been finished:
>
> An error occured during installation of assembly
> component
> {241560EA-12B7-37C4-9724-DE33E7FE7BB7}
> HRESULT: 0x8007041D

http://geekswithblogs.net/jemimus/archive/2005/11/14/60064.aspx

signature.asc

Peter Melvyn

unread,
Jul 3, 2008, 6:40:06 AM7/3/08
to us...@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
On Jul 3, 10:27 am, Stefan Küng <tortoise...@gmail.com> wrote:

> http://geekswithblogs.net/jemimus/archive/2005/11/14/60064.aspx

???

It just shows: Application Error. No error message available

Stefan Küng

unread,
Jul 3, 2008, 6:50:00 AM7/3/08
to us...@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 12:40, Peter Melvyn <peter....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 3, 10:27 am, Stefan Küng <tortoise...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> http://geekswithblogs.net/jemimus/archive/2005/11/14/60064.aspx
>
> ???
>
> It just shows: Application Error. No error message available

Please make up your mind. Either you did get an error message as you
wrote before (quote: "I tried reinstall it with build 13403 and I got


an error before
installation process has been finished:

An error occured during installation of assembly
component
{241560EA-12B7-37C4-9724-DE33E7FE7BB7}
HRESULT: 0x8007041D

")

Or you didn't. So what is it?

Kurt Pruenner

unread,
Jul 3, 2008, 7:29:59 AM7/3/08
to us...@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Stefan Küng wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 12:40, Peter Melvyn wrote:
> > On Jul 3, 10:27 am, Stefan Küng wrote:
> > > http://geekswithblogs.net/jemimus/archive/2005/11/14/60064.aspx
> >
> > ???
> >
> > It just shows: Application Error. No error message available
>
> Please make up your mind. Either you did get an error message as you
> wrote before [...] Or you didn't. So what is it?

I'm pretty sure he meant that the blog site you linked to was down
earlier on, as all I got was an error message from the server when I
tried visiting it this morning.

It's working now, though...

--
Kurt Bernhard Pruenner --- Haendelstrasse 17 --- 4020 Linz --- Austria
.......It might be written "Mindfuck", but it's spelt "L-A-I-N".......

Stefan Küng

unread,
Jul 3, 2008, 12:11:51 PM7/3/08
to us...@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
Kurt Pruenner wrote:
> Stefan Küng wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 12:40, Peter Melvyn wrote:
>>> On Jul 3, 10:27 am, Stefan Küng wrote:
>>>> http://geekswithblogs.net/jemimus/archive/2005/11/14/60064.aspx
>>> ???
>>>
>>> It just shows: Application Error. No error message available
>> Please make up your mind. Either you did get an error message as you
>> wrote before [...] Or you didn't. So what is it?
>
> I'm pretty sure he meant that the blog site you linked to was down
> earlier on, as all I got was an error message from the server when I
> tried visiting it this morning.
>
> It's working now, though...

Sorry, when I searched the web for the error code, that page was online.
Next time, instead of writing "???" please just mention that the page is
not reachable - I'm not a mind reader.

signature.asc

Peter Melvyn

unread,
Jul 3, 2008, 2:18:02 PM7/3/08
to us...@tortoisesvn.tigris.org
On Jul 3, 6:11 pm, Stefan Küng <tortoise...@gmail.com> wrote:

> >>> It just shows: Application Error. No error message available

> Sorry, when I searched the web for the error code, that page was online.


> Next time, instead of writing "???" please just mention that the page is
> not reachable - I'm not a mind reader.

The problem is, that page *was* reachable: it responded with
unsightly logo and text:

Application Error. No error message available

hence I had no idea what you meant referring me to such page,
on the top of all residing on a some blog I don't use to read them...

Next time, I suggest to drop a simple message:

STFW for the error code

;-)

Peter


BTW, I retried to install build #13403 successfully, but currently
I have no time to test it.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages