Re: 2011-14 Dodge Charger/Chrysler300 8.4N RB5 OEM Radio GPS unit (mississauga) $500

[bakes969]

> Sale 8760766485 wrote:
>
> Hello I have a used pulled 2011 Chrysler 300 OEM radio unit
part #P05064538AJ. This unit will also work in 2011,2012,2013 Dodge
chargers and 2011,12,13,14 Chrysler 300 also please see photo of one
installed in my vehicle it is (Example Only) which is a Chrysler 300
unit they are the same as dodge chargers and will load up as dodge or
Chrysler when installed in you vehicle RB5 uconnect Dvd/CD Garmin
navigation player unit, has Bluetooth and Sirus satellite radio and SD
card slot. Also the yellow plug on the back of this unit is a dual
Sirius satellite/Blue GPS antenna need both to make one connection to
get the GPS to work. which can be purchase through your local dealer.
This unit is can be used with RE2 or RB5 Back up camera which also
maybe purchase through local dealership. Again this unit Does
everything RB5 including Garmin Navigation. When I upgraded my unit
from the 4.3 it was plug and play no code needed if you let your pcm
communicate with this unit installed (20mins) it should activate.
Chrysler units are blue/silver while Dodge units are red and black a
simple software firmware update will change the color of your unit. If
you Run into the problem of activating unit please write down the SN
T# off the top of the unit to obtain code from dealer.You may need to
have unit flashed to your vin number dealer may charge small fee
please keep in mind that's the cost of buying used units or maybe be
free.
> Also do not listen to your local dealership as they lie and tell
you you can't upgrade you vehicles due to it not coming in the car
when you brought it. If you get the 8.4 screen your current wireing
harness will connect to the ac controls and new upgraded unit. This
unit is completely plug and play! You may be required to install a GPS
antenna if your car didnt come with one but these can be purchased
from oemautopartsco.com very easily.
>
>
>
> Location: mississaugaPrice: $500
>
>


This is a response to the post seen at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=301788683#301788683