rdfs:comment italic

[Julia S.]

Is there a way to make a rdfs:comment within a workflow italic, or is there a property that results in something like a cursive comment?

I tried edg:description (and added the appropriate prefix) but apparently that violates constraints set for workflows.

Thanks for your help!

Regards

Julia

[Holger Knublauch]

I guess this depends on what type of instances/assets you are adding the rdfs:comment to. I just tried it for a skos:ConceptScheme, and there I get a rich text editor resulting in an rdf:HTML literal that preserves the formatting

This is available for any class at which rdfs:comment has a sh:datatype including rdf:HTML.

If it's unclear, would you share a screenshot about where you want the italic font to be used?

Holger

--
The topics of this mailing list include TopBraid EDG and related technologies such as SHACL.
To post to this group, send email to topbrai...@googlegroups.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to topbraid-user...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/2dc1d73e-d6a2-458b-b004-2d7cf9050bdfn%40googlegroups.com.

[Julia S.]

Hi Holger,

I think rdfs:comment must work differently for workflows. It works just as you described in other classes (I just added a comment to a graph and one of it's instances). However, when I use it in the workflow ttl file, it simply writes out the code.

I have added some screenshots below

This is what it looks like in the edg, when opening the edited version increment workflow in textual view.

This is the code ("HTML;" is cut off in the screenshot, my apologies)

Thanks

[Holger Knublauch]

Hi Julia,

thanks for the screenshot, which perfectly clarifies what you mean. In this part of the UI, we only support plain strings, and that is a design choice because the comments are meant to be part of a sentence only, while the "It means that" is hard-coded. If we were to allow arbitrary HTML such as yours, it would break the layout, e.g. the <div> would cause a line break, and also complicate the other places where these comments are displayed.

So I am afraid this is limited to plain strings, without formatting.

Holger

On 17 Aug 2023, at 8:01 am, Julia S. <julis...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Holger,

I think rdfs:comment must work differently for workflows. It works just as you described in other classes (I just added a comment to a graph and one of it's instances). However, when I use it in the workflow ttl file, it simply writes out the code.

I have added some screenshots below

This is what it looks like in the edg, when opening the edited version increment workflow in textual view.

<example_workflow_textual_view.PNG>

This is the code ("HTML;" is cut off in the screenshot, my apologies)

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/a402c761-8521-4663-af04-ed7c0caff01en%40googlegroups.com.
<example_workflow_textual_view.PNG><example_workflow_code_italic.PNG>