I can confirm that Sesame 2 is the main avenue for using OWLIM and BigOWLIM in particular, so, it is
unlikely that there are problems related to this integration
What I should note however is that since v.3.4, Nov'10, BigOWLIM is also well integrated with Jena.
Even for some tasks the performance through Jena is better. You can look at these two pages:
http://www.ontotext.com/owlim/access_methods.html
http://www.ontotext.com/owlim/owlim-jena-performance.html
We are also just about to release BigOWLIM v3.5 where really all advanced features (e.g. geo-spatial
indices, etc.) are available through Jena also
Thus, it could be interesting for you to try to integrate BigOWLIM to TBC through Jena, instead of
Sesame. One benefit of using BigOWLIM through Jena is full SPARQL 1.1 support (aggregates, updates,
etc.) which is still not available through Sesame
Cheers
Naso
p.s.: I am CC-ing Barry Bishop, the product manager of OWLIM, who may want to add/comment also
--
----------------------------------------------------------
Atanas Kiryakov
Executive Director
Ontotext AD, http://www.ontotext.com
Phone: (+359 2) 974 61 44; Fax: 975 3226
----------------------------------------------------------