TopBraid Suite Users

Here you see my 2 issues in one: As generated after edg/import: smartasfalt:MonsterLaag-zanddriehoek

I noticed that: zanddriehoek_180_µm_63_µm did not result in a prefixed name because of 'µ'…

By explicitly formatting cells as Number this seems solved…. (they become xsd:double) Only now my

It seems that dashes and underscores from attribute names disappear in de semantic sheet conversion.

This is for subject(s): Here is a variation that does either added subject, predicate or object:

Thanks Taryn, I've got it to work with credentials. I do get a pop up for "token password

Hi Simon, I just checked this (rather old) code and rediscovered that the available properties are

BTW looking at your example, you seem to have two ways of attaching the children - one in a list-like

On 2021-09-07 3:07 pm, Scott Henninger wrote: Thanks for the help Holger, it gave me some ideas,

Thanks for the quick response, Holger. I suspect other problems with my shape definition that got me

On 2021-09-02 5:19 pm, 'Bohms, HM (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users wrote: > > Thx

To get to the integrated GraphiQL query editor, go to your Taxonomy in EDG and then click on Export -

This is possible via Active Data Shapes (ADS) http://datashapes.org/active/ For example call graph.

For the record, there is a solution for this built into EDG. Assuming you have the SKOS shapes

OK - ta. Thought I'd check before doing anything else. On Fri, 20 Aug 2021 at 09:07, Holger

On 2021-08-13 7:42 pm, Tomek Pluskiewicz wrote: I think it's slightly different, in a scenario a

On 2021-08-13 2:35 am, Carl Burnett wrote: Thanks, Holger. The main differences between the country/

Hello, Is it possible to create a new graph in EDG via script or program or web service? Mike

Ok, thank you for clarifying. Somehow I thought that DetailsViewer was also a multi viewer but that

Makes sense. Thanks. I think the important aspect is that any given page in a Web app will be

I've been looking into GraphQL more recently, so it's a possibility. When I originally asked

Hi Matt, without understanding all consequences and requirements, some comments below. On 2021-08-02

Hi Tom, you may want to ask the developers of that validation engine. Your example works fine on the

Oops, yes. I need to record this for the errata. This is a W3C doc that I cannot simply change.

No. Holger On 28/07/2021 5:24 pm, 'Bohms, HM (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users wrote: >

I see. No, we have not yet implemented such complex requirements for widget selection. You may need

Thanks for the details, Matt. I have followed up on the TSM-2508 ticket, so let's take it from

As a bit of technical background, we use the Apache Jena SPARQL engine, known as ARQ [1]. This engine

We are considering hosting a Git repository for such extensions. On Jul 21, 2021, at 8:57 PM, Rob

If it's adding OWL structures then you are using the Composer OWL editing forms - so stop doing