G'day,
It occurred to me a week or so back, as I was contemplating why there
appears to be limited take-up of Linux by women, that perhaps it could
be more of a case of social conditioning and differing perceptions
than something more esoteric.
Form vs Function. Warning a blatent generalisation ahead! Men tend
to perfer function over form (or else why do we bemoan the decline of
the Terminal). Women tend to prefer form working with function. It
was highlighted while trolling forums and letters in IT mags that some
things caught my beady little eye. Men have had better uptake of
Linux by their partners with a fully functional (plus the social-
desktop) version of KDE 4.4. Too often comments like "Oh! It looks
and works much better than Windows" was posted as reason for
switching.
This could be way too simplistic, but there may be some truth here.
If this could be "a reason" then it would benefit us by have a fully
functional version of KDE 4.4 available for viewing. Anyway, guys who
like a "kewl" desktop will be "wowed" by this and be pushed towards
Linux.
Cheers
Martin
PS. Aim for the Target on my back!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ToowoombaLinux" group.
To post to this group, send email to
toowoom...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
toowoombalinu...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/toowoombalinux?hl=en.