You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Tone Clusters: The Joyce Carol Oates Discussion Group
Oates wrote an essay calling Sylvia Plath "the last of the Romantics" and saying Plath was in thrall to a "kind of masculine, combative 'I-ness'" that originated in the Renaissance.
Is Oates right about Plath?
Max Alberts
unread,
May 18, 2020, 9:42:01 AM5/18/20
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to tonecl...@googlegroups.com
It would seem that Sylvia Plath was a genius and that her gifts were certainly recognized as such when she was in college. She was an enormously ambitious, competitive person and if THE BELL JAR offers any clues, Plath enjoyed taking big risks. The Humanities haven't changed much since the Renaissance and, sadly, neither has western patriarchy. Visit any English Department anywhere in the western hemisphere and that will instantly become clear to you. The "combative I-nesss" of which Oates writes is built into the system. Plath mastered that system, until she didn't. There's much more to write on this subject, but to answer your immediate question, yes, Oates is correct.
Oates wrote an essay calling Sylvia Plath "the last of the Romantics" and saying Plath was in thrall to a "kind of masculine, combative 'I-ness'" that originated in the Renaissance.
Is Oates right about Plath?
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Tone Clusters: The Joyce Carol Oates Discussion Group."