Flow offloading = on (in firewall, both software and hardware). OpenWRT was miserable for an entire year without that working. Also, my understanding is that you can't expect (almost??) any kind of intelligent filtering, like QOS/traffic shaping going on, because flow offloading effectively bypasses that. DD-wrt also uses some kind of implementation, and it might be slightly different, but with flow offloading you should get roughly the same effect in OpenWRT. Yeah, if you want per-packet filtering and all the shaping working, you probably need to spend some dough for a better CPU so that you can get these speeds with flow offloading turned off.
In other words, the a7 v5 cannot achieve the performance figures you've stated, in practice it can do around 175-200 MBit/s (and it's very jagged/ laggy/ sawtooth like at the upper end of that) of plain routing (less with PPPoE, significantly less with sqm). Flow-offloading is a fair-weather approach, if your traffic can be offloaded effectively, it might do - but it's not a reliable or dependable approach and comes with its own share of quirks (e.g. traffic accounting is inaccurate by the very nature of the kernel never getting to see the offloaded packets). When choosing a device, you need to consider the unaccelerated performance figures, because those are what you can depend on - flow-offloading is just a free bonus on top, might save your bacon a few years down the line, after an unexpected speed increase, but it's better not taken for granted,
I have three APs (one MR56 and two MR55) which are not working as expected. The network speed for the computers is very very slow (it is running on kbps), but it is working fine for mobile phones. I dont have anything configured for traffic shaping. I have tried changing the radio settings (we are using basic indoor profile), f.ex. enabling the band steering on dual band operation, but no improve, then I disabled the 802.11ax but still no improve. I have tried things I thought might help but nothing helped. Can someone please advice what can I do to fix this issue?
With the MR56 we had very slow upload speeds which affected the clients poorly. Meraki identified an issue and fixed it with a custom firmware that is supposed to be released in beta 28.6. Do some speed tests on the internet with a connected client and see what your upload and download speeds are. IF you have slow uploads like I was getting 2.5Kbps then contact support and try the firmware. Reference case #05512885 for them to identify the firmware that was built.
Having the same issue on my new Wahoo KICKR core. My uphills are on target for power and a strong cadence but I am going 3-5km/hr. My FTP is 200 set by via Wahoo. I can get speed on downhills, but my average speed over a course is very slow resulting in really low mileage for an hour ride!
Thirty-four untrained women participated in a 6-week program to investigate slow-speed versus "normal" speed resistance-training protocols. Subjects were divided into: slow-speed (SS), normal-speed/traditional-strength (TS), normal-speed/traditional muscular endurance (TE), and non-exercising control (C) groups. Leg press, squats, and knee extensions were performed 2 days/week for the first week and 3 days/week for the remaining 5 weeks (2 min rest). The SS group performed 6-10 repetitions maximum (6-10RM) for each set with 10 s concentric (con) and 4 s eccentric (ecc) contractions. The TS and TE groups performed sets of 6-10RM and 20-30RM, respectively, at "normal" speed (1-2 s/con and ecc contractions). TE and SS trained at the same relative intensity (40-60% 1RM), whereas TS trained at 80-85% 1RM. Pre- and post-training muscle biopsies were analyzed for fiber-type composition, cross-sectional area (CSA), and myosin heavy chain (MHC) content. The percentage of type IIX fibers decreased and IIAX increased in all three training groups. However, only TS showed an increase in percentage of type IIA fibers. CSA of fiber types I, IIA, and IIX increased in TS. In SS, only the CSA of IIA and IIX fibers increased. These changes were supported by MHC data. No significant changes for any parameters were found for the C group. In conclusion, slow-speed strength training induced a greater adaptive response compared to training with a similar resistance at "normal" speed. However, training with a higher intensity at "normal" speed resulted in the greatest overall muscle fiber response in each of the variables assessed.
I think my issue may have been solved. I made sure the rear wheel was centered on the magnetic wheel and played around with the pressure it was putting on the wheel itself. I rode for few minutes and then toward the end of the ride, it picked up speed.
Thank you, Bob. So, I removed the resistance completely from the rear tire. The watts went up to 90100 and it picked up little bit speed but it felt more like I was in sand. Speed was little bit faster. I will play around with resistance.
Gerrie, thank you. Removed the cadence sensor. When I was trying to remove the rear tire axle, I must have tightened the rear brakes. I have loosened it a bit while removing all resistence. The speed was a little bit improved but it was the same as you described, spinning fast in the air. Perhaps I should try again adding some resistance now that brakes are not that much blocking the wheel. Hope to get better speed.
I tested my internet speed and I should have 70-80 Mbps download / 10-20 Mpbs upload. On Dropbox I've only been getting a dismal 1-3 kbps upload speed! I had one 80-megabyte file that was taking days to "sync" to Dropbox. I moved it to my Google Drive and it only took about minute to upload there. So it's really Dropbox that's the problem. I'm very annoyed because I've been relying on Dropbox as my primary syncing service and just renewed my subscription last April. If I can't use Dropbox properly due to the unbearably slow upload speed I'll have to move back to Google Drive.
Thank you for your response, @Lusil! I would like to update you that I tried using a VPN, and my Dropbox upload speed is back to normal. I suspect that my ISP might be throttling Dropbox traffic because my friend using the same ISP was also experiencing extremely slow service with Dropbox and also got their Dropbox upload speed back to normal when they turned on their VPN. So this is something you might want to suggest to other users experiencing similar.
@jojosimi @Charlene2 I was able to get back my normal Dropbox upload speed by using a VPN. It seems to be an ISP throttling issue for me. If you want to try using a VPN and need help choosing one, I found this comparison chart very honest and helpful:
Hi Lusil, thanks! Actually, I've had Google Drive off for a while now because I was relying primarily on Dropbox. I only turned on Google Drive precisely because I noticed that Dropbox was taking forever to upload even tiny text files, and I really needed to sync some files with my phone, so I turned on Google Drive to try comparing upload speed.
I am using TunnelBear as my VPN and I see no difference. I have 7GB across 5 files I need to upload with speeds as slow as 10kbps. I have a 120mbit download and 10mbit upload connection. At this point I'm debating cancelling my account. I'm not paying for this result.
's get placed here -->XReplies [email protected] Sep 14, 2022 06:05pm #1The "go-to" setup for many turners is an 8" slow speed grinder and CBN wheels. The CBN wheels wear so slowly it's almost imperceptible. They'll last many years and they do not change diameter like friable wheels. This allows for repeatable results with grinding and sharpening jigs.
By the time you have bought a slow speed grinder and the CBN wheels, you are getting into Tormek price territory.
Also you need to be aware that CBN is for HSS steel only - it does clog if you try to grind softer steels on it, and most tool steels are softer than HSS, though I have never tried PMV11.
I use the grinder and CBN for most turning as it's really fast and easy. great for gouges of all kinds.
For other tools, I use stones and though I have invested in the Tormek it's still in its box so can't report any personal experiences.
Note: the half-speed bench grinder is really only needed for plane blades and bench chisels. If you are a turner, where HSS lathe chisels are the norm, then a high speed bench grinder would possibly be better (as the little extra heat does not make a difference this this instance).
Ditto,
I don't remember how long ago i got my first CBN wheel, it has to be over ten years now. You can grind most typical items you would find in a woodworking shop, except aluminum which can clog it up.
For turning, a slow speed grinder is usually preferred With a high speed grinder, it is too easy to over grind with a CBN wheel and too easy to overheat with a friable wheel.
Was just what I was going to suggest as well. He uses his grandfather's old high speed bench grinder. I like any bench grinder as well. If I were going to but something today, I would be inclined to get Rikon's Tormek knockoff. It's on sale at Rockler for like $170 or$180 and I'd stick with whatever grinding stone that comes with it. From my perspective, any electron powered grinder would be helpful for when I need to do something significant. As for day to day sharpening, I would reccomend a sharpening jig if you think the freehand you might be doing isn't giving satisfactory results.
df19127ead