In the national education system, the ability to read and write the Qur'an has become a competency that students in Islamic universities must be fulfilled. Based on the results of LPMQ research conducted by the Ministry of Religious Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia's Research and Development Agency and Training in 2019 on the Al-Qur'an Reading and Writing (BTQ) Ability Index at 11 State Islamic Universities (PTIN) in Indonesia, UIN Ar-Raniry Aceh came in the last second from the bottom. This paper seeks to explain why UIN Ar-Raniry Aceh students have low ability in reading and writing the Qur'an. This article uses case study method. Questionnaires, interviews, Quranic reading and writing tests, and documentation were used to collect data. The findings of the data analysis reveal that both internal and external variables contributed to the poor BTQ ability of UIN Ar-Raniry Aceh students. Internal factors focus on students' poor motivation to learn the Qur'an, which is exacerbated by external factors, such as a familial setting that discourages the development of habits to engage with the Qur'an in everyday life.
The Qur'an views the Library as an essential means to be able to change a nation that initially did not understand anything into a country that is knowledgeable and has a high civilization. This is evidenced by the mention of the roles of libraries in the Qur'an, which at least consists of several concepts, the concept of reading, the concept of writing, the idea of science, the concept of education, the concept of worship, the concept of communication and information. The command to read means that Allah SWT wants reading facilities so that the teaching of reading becomes a reality that can increase one's knowledge. One of the facilities that can be used for reading activities in the Library. Thus, establishing a library as a means of reading and learning is a development of an effort to create a reading culture as commanded by Allah SWT. This study aims to determine the development map and trend of the Library based on the Quran published by well-known journals in the field of Library science. The data analyzed were more than 126 Scopus indexed research publications. The export data is then processed and analyzed using the R Biblioshiny application program to determine the text analysis of the development of the Library based on the Quran. Historically, the majority of libraries in Islam are waqf-based. Libraries in the view of the Quran include studies of reading interest, information functions, educational functions, preservation functions. Library-related studies are found in several verses of the Quran.
The Quran.Foundation (which includes Quran.com) is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that strives to empower every human being to benefit from the Quran. Quran.Foundation values and respects the privacy of all of our users.
We collect certain personal information from users who choose to create an account on Quran.com. This information may include:
Email Address: We collect your email address to facilitate the account creation process and for communication purposes related to your account, including account recovery and security notifications.
We use the personal information we collect for the following purposes:
We may use your email address to send you important updates, newsletters, or notifications related to our services, content, etc. You will have the ability to unsubscribe from these communications at any time.
We take appropriate measures to protect your personal information from unauthorized access, alteration, disclosure, or destruction. We use industry-standard security protocols and employ physical, electronic, and managerial safeguards to ensure the confidentiality and integrity of your data.
To ensure your privacy and control over your personal information, we provide a straightforward account deletion process. When you choose to delete your account, all associated personal data will be automatically and permanently removed from our systems. You can initiate the account deletion by accessing your profile page. Once the deletion is initiated, your personal data will be securely deleted from our servers within a reasonable timeframe.
Quran.com employs cookies to enhance your browsing experience, provide personalized content, and analyze website traffic. By accessing and using our website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with this Privacy Policy.
If you have any questions, concerns, or requests regarding this Privacy Policy or the handling of your personal information, please contact us here. By using our website, you acknowledge that you have read and understood this Privacy Policy and consent to the collection, use, and disclosure of your personal information as described.
I strongly advise readers to skip this preparation chapter and start reading the coding evidences chapters of the 19 System, especially from the chapters Chapter 4 and Chapter 5. This whole chapter has technical details about the used text and the rules and so on, which you ca later revisit and read when you have more time and energy.
Therefore, in my opinion, any old or modern, text that is written in the classic Arabic grammar and accepted as fully representing the Quran (Hafs recitation/mushaf) by scholars might be considered for the text analysis to see if there is a meaningful rule based systematic coding design over the text that suggest that the text is intact and unchanged. In the end, the recitation (the Zikr / the Reminder) was declared to be protected by God but not the text of the book in the verse 15:9.
Without being aware of much of the above information in the beginning of my study for this book in the early 2019, I had hypothesized that, the text of Quran can well be designed by God to the last letter of it and I discovered the codes that includes all the letters information as can be seen in Chapter 4.2 and in some other chapters. I presented them separately from the main evidences, which are presented in Chapter 4, Chapter 4.1.2 and also Chapter 5, which do not include letter information but just word information regarding the content and thus might be considered as universal as it is applicable to all the common Hafs mushafs from history to our current date. Because, although the writing of the words might slightly change, all the words are the same as they do not change the meaning of the words. Because of this fact, the codes that includes letter information are always considered weaker compared to the codes that do not include letter information as the data without letters information can be considered as intact and reliable for all the common Hafs mushafs that have been used by the majority of Muslims till now.
The codes with letters information are considered valid only if there is no apparent error about a letter with respect to the classic Arabic language. We know there are various ways of writing the same words with slightly different letters in some cases though it gives the same meaning when it comes to Hafs recitation. Although people recite Quran correctly, they overlook those letter changes among the texts and just ignore them as they know how to recite the word anyways. In case if there is any single letter is found to be apparently erroneous in the text I used, then, most probably, all the letter incorporating codings that I present in this book should collapse. So, feel free to reach out to me if you are 100% sure that there is an error in any of the 332837 total letters of the text of Quran manuscript I used. Nonetheless, make sure to consult with an expert on Arabic language before coming to conclusion on this as there are already known variations in writings of some of the words. Because of these variations in writings, I consider the codings in my book that includes the letters information as weaker evidences compare to others. Since the first publication of the book, I never received solid mathematical objection to the codes I presented but the ones who tried to falsify, always first attacked the letters information I used by ignoring the main code evidences. I suggest those kinds of people to ignore all the letters based evidences, which I already designated as weaker, and look at first the main evidences that do not include letters information. Therefore, I suggest to those kinds of readers to read first the main evidences and also the other evidences that do not include letters information and ignore the the letters based codings. If they see no issue with the main ones, then they have already witnessed the 19 system based on chapter, verse and words information, which indicates the intact design over the text and hence suggest that the text is intact and unchanged too. Certainly, these evidences have their own limits in proving the intact and unchanged text of Quran as the evidences can only go into the resolution of the number of words or letters per verse. However, for the ones without negative biases, it should indicate sufficient evidences as there is already one common Hafs manuscript used by Muslims. The question is not to select a manuscript among various text versions but to test whether or not there is a clear rule based system over the full text of the common Hafs manuscript.
7fc3f7cf58