Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Pollution, Environment and Conservation - Books and Magazines

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Gman

unread,
Oct 15, 2004, 3:00:40 AM10/15/04
to
www.pollution.net - Books and magazines on Pollution, Conservation and
Environmental topics.


--
www.pollution.net - Knowledge base on Pollution, Environment and
Conservation


Gman

unread,
Dec 1, 2004, 5:41:49 AM12/1/04
to
drug use, left her job after declining to take a "degrading"
: urinalysis test at her company, then known as Tech Tool Grinding &
: Supply Inc.
:
: It required disrobing, donning a hospital gown, and submitting to
: bodily inspection by a medical staff person.
:
: But the highest court in the state said that the testing was legitimate.
: Source: Folmsbee v.Tech Tool Grinding & Supply Inc., 417 Mass. 338, 630
: N.E. 2d 586 (1994).


It is totally urinating what the politicians and
courts have allowed in the name of the Drug War.


: Privacy Journal's War Stories, By Attorney Robert Ellis Smith
:
: Burlingame, CA, 1990: A flight attendant suffered medical complications
: because of Federal requirements that compel drug-monitors to have
: employees drink water until they can provide a urine sample. The 40-year-
: old woman was unable to urinate in a random drug test. She drank three
: quarts of water and even vomited some of it but could not urinate in the
: noisy crowded test site. She became ill at home and a doctor diagnosed
: her condition as "water intoxication." The lack of privacy inhibits
: 25 percent of people from urinating, surveys show [JAMA 1/2/91].


Drug testing doesn't even work. Could there be a
more important use for it than public safety?

It made no difference to the drunk and sleepy subway motorman in the
spectacular underground smash-up at the Union Square Station in NYC.
Even if he had a drug test before his shift, he still would have
had the accident.


0 new messages